Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.77s

  • Brown v. State

    7 Okla. Crim. 678 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 26, 1912

    Bivens v. State, supra, 2 Bishop’s New Crim. Law, par. 839; 1 Bishop’s New Crim. Proc. par. 59. … In the case of State v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2021 Ohio 2381 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2021

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2021-Ohio-2381.] … State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    6 Cal. App. 5th 1074 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2016

    (c)(37); People v. … (People v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Shelton

    156 S.W.3d 319 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Dec 30, 2004

    Kenneth Brown brings this appeal from a January 9, 2004, Judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court. We reverse and remand. … Skelton v. Roberts, Ky.App., 673 S.W.2d 733 (1984). The language found in this rule is mandatory. Id.; Standard Farm Stores v. Dixon, Ky., 339 S.W.2d 440 (1960).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lopez v. Brown

    356 S.W.3d 599 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Aug 11, 2011

    Transitional Care Ctrs. of Tex., Inc. v. Palacios, 46 S.W.3d 873, 875 (Tex.2001); Group v. Vicenta, 164 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied). … See Hamilton v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    967 So. 2d 440 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 7, 2007

    967 So.2d 440 (2007) Tobias BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D07-1464. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 7, 2007. *442 Tobias Brown, Indiantown, pro se. … Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In this case, Brown pleaded guilty to the charges.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    577 So. 2d 708 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 10, 1991

    Although Officer Cuicci needed no founded suspicion to approach and talk to Brown, once he directed Brown to exit the car, the encounter became a stop since Brown was no longer free to leave. See State v. … Here, several factors indicate a pretext, including the fact that Brown was not cited for a traffic violation. See Smith v. State, 564 So.2d 503 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Whitfield v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2021 Ohio 3347 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 2021

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2021-Ohio-3347.] … : DONTELLE BROWN, : Defendant-Appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jehly v. Brown

    327 P.3d 351 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2014

    T11 In Wright v. … See Brickell v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    41 A.D.3d 1234 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 2007

    County Court was not required to “ ‘engage in any particular litany’ ” (People v Calvi, 89 NY2d 868, 871 [1996]; see People v Looney, 20 AD3d 926 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 807 [2005]; People v Brown, 281 AD2d 962 [2001], lv … The plea allocution establishes that the waiver of the right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see Calvi, 89 NY2d at 871 ; Looney, 20 AD3d 926 [2005]; Brown, 281 AD2d at 962 ), even though some

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Prenell v. Brown

    130 So. 2d 520 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 22, 1961

    Stewart, La.App. 2 Cir., 111 So.2d 142 ; King v. Brown, La.App. 2 Cir., 115 So.2d 405 ; In re United States Gypsum Company, La.App.Orl., 121 So.2d 362 . In Lacombe v. … In King v. Brown, supra, the plaintiff had been instructed to park his car in a specified location and not to bring it to the job site.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    138 So. 3d 510 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 30, 2014

    State, 991 So.2d 835 (Fla.2008). 1 In his motion for rehearing, Brown emphasized that his factual allegations must be taken as true and they entitled him to relief under Malespin v. … In March 2012, the United State Supreme Court issued Lafler v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Enochs v. Brown

    872 S.W.2d 312 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1994

    Tex.R.Civ.P. 67, 90; see Roark v. … The court in Murray v.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Roberts v. Williamson, 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 944 (2003)Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Candelora

    708 A.2d 104 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1998

    Brown and $65,750.00 in favor of Mrs. Brown. Following the denial of post-trial motions, an appeal was taken to this Court, which affirmed the judgments as entered. Brown v. … Brown v. Candelora, 453 Pa.Super. 677 , 683 A.2d 307 (1996) (Memorandum).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Maynard v. Brown

    276 Ga. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 4, 2005

    Brown filed his petition for adoption of C. M. … Kennedy v. Brown, 239 Ga. 286, 288 (2) ( 236 SE2d 632 ) (1977).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Brown

    248 S.W.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1952

    Phoenix Refining Co. v. Tips, 125 Tex. 69 , 81 S.W.2d 60, 62 . In Hawkins v. … Brown, at the time he executed the will was -acting ■under the undue influence of J. T. Brown, and the burden was on them to‘ prove it. Long v. Long, 133 Tex. 96 , 125 S.W.2d 1034 ; Burkett v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    177 So. 2d 532 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 4, 1965

    177 So.2d 532 (1965) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Willie BROWN, Appellee. No. 5793. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District. August 4, 1965. Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. … Johnson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 798 ; Kaminski v. State, 1956, Fla., 63 So.2d 339 . The court, however, in the Johnson v. State case, supra, quoted with approval the case of State v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Newby

    8 Cal. App. 2d 203 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1935

    Charles V. Eakin. This loan was renewed on three different occasions by the execution of a new note for said sum guaranteed on each occasion by the four guarantors. … (Horton v. Winbigler, 175 Cal. 149 [ 165 Pac. 423 ]; Runo v. Williams, 162 Cal. 444 [ 122 Pac. 1082 ]; Barnhart v. Fulkerth, 93 Cal. 497 [ 29 Pac. 50 ]; Kyle v. Craig, 125 Cal. 107 [ 57 Pac. 791 ].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. Brown

    641 S.W.2d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1982

    Byrd v. Brown, supra, 613 S.W.2d at 698-699 [6-8]. … Byrd v. Brown, supra, 613 S.W.2d at 699-700 [9-11].

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Comm'r

    67 Md. App. 727 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 5, 1986

    Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 205 Md. 489 [ 109 A.2d 85 ] (1954). … As to the ex parte communications, Nationwide relies on Camero v. United States, 375 F.2d 777 (Ct.Cl. 1967) and Brown v. United States, 377 F. Supp. 530 (N.D. Tex. 1974).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.