Case law

McKinney v. Blankenship

154 Tex. 632 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1955

As to the other defendants, the trial court’s judgment was *636 undoubtedly predicated on the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S. … Brown v.

Ex Parte Hemby

765 S.W.2d 791 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1989

Williams v. United States, 401 U.S. 646, 653 , 91 S.Ct. 1148, 1152 , 28 L.Ed.2d 388, 395 (1971) (Plurality opinion). See also Brown v. … In Brown v. Louisiana, supra, a plurality of the Court regarded the rule in Burch v.

Duncan, Tax Collector v. Gabler

147 Tex. 229 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1948

Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Texas 1 , 75 S. W. 488 . … In Brown v. Bonougli, 111 Texas 275 , 232 S.

ESTEVEZ, EX PARTE AMARILLYZ v. the State of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 2025

App. 2010) (stating that double jeopardy is violated when there is “a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction” (quoting Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977))). … Brown, 432 U.S. at 166 & n.6 (citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932)).

Harris v. State

738 S.W.2d 207 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 11, 1987

Brooks v. State, supra; Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Arn ey v. State, 580 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Easter v. State, supra, at p. 225. … Gonzales v. State, 441 S.W.2d 539 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Allen v. State, 461 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Cr. App.1982). 7 We further observe that in Danny Ray Harris v.

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 56 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Brown to the hands of Lavinia Brown; but anything that shows to your satisfaction that D. AT. … In Moore v.

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 45 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Munson v. Hallowell, 26 Tex., 486 ; Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex., 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex., 354 ; Bremond v. McLean, 45 Tex., 11 ; Alston v. Richardson, 51 Tex., 1 . … Henderson v. Pilgrim, 22 Tex., 471 ; Wade on the Law of Notice, sec. 34.

Brown v. Brown

71 Tex. 355 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1888

B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. Stovall

147 Tex. 366 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1949

In other cases it has likewise been assumed that boards of adjustments are proper parties. See Harrington v. Board of Adjustment, 124 S. W. (2d) 401 (Tex. Civ. App., writ of error refused); Board of Adjustment v. … R. 207; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 766 , 4 So. (2d) 822 ; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 758 , 4 So. (2d) 820 ; see 4 C.

Ex Parte Geiken

28 S.W.3d 553 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 2000

Nichols v. … Similarly, in Board of Pardons v.

Geo. Seligson & Co. v. Brown & Brown

61 Tex. 180 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1884

We do not, however, undertake to decide whether or not any application of these notes would have saved the sale to Brown & Brown from being held fraudulent. … Avery v. Johann, 27 Wis., 246 ; Green v. Gantum, 19 N. J. Eq., 105; Gregory v. Harrington, 33 Vt., 241 . It has been held to the contrary in Mississippi (Farmers’ Bank v.

Brown v. State

270 S.W.3d 564 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 2008

In October 2005, a jury convicted appellant, Alfred DeWayne Brown, of capital murder committed on April 3, 2003. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.03 (a). … Cantu v.

Brown v. State

122 S.W.3d 794 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 2003

Brown v. State, 92 S.W.3d 655 (Tex.App.Dallas 2002). . Id. at 665 . . TexCode Crim. Proc. art. 36.14. .See Lagrone v. … As pointed out by the Dallas Court of Appeals, all three of those courts relied on Browning and its progeny, and either relied on or mentioned Garcia. Brown, 92 S.W.3d at 664 . . Brown, 92 S.W.3d at 665 . . Id. .

State v. Brown

51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1254 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2008

Brown v. State, 984 S.W.2d 348, 349 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied). On appeal, Brown renewed his complaints about the third amended petition. Id. … See Stevens v. Nat’l Educ. Ctrs., Inc., 11 S.W.3d 185, 186 (Tex.2000); Horrocks v. Tex.

Brown v. State

98 S.W.3d 180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 2003

Relying on former Presiding Judge McCormick’s dissenting opinion to this Court’s refusal of the State’s discretionary review petition in Teer v. State, the Court of Appeals rejected this claim. Brown v. … See Jordan, 36 S.W.3d at 873 (in construing an ambiguous statute, courts may consider “object sought to be obtained”); Brown v.

Brown v. Todd

53 S.W.3d 297 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2001

Co. v. … V.

Brown v. State

943 S.W.2d 35 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1997

Brown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 533 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1995). … McNew v.

Brown v. State

911 S.W.2d 744 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1995

Brown v. State, 878 S.W.2d 695 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1994). … E.g,, Cude v. State, 716 S.W.2d 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Meeks v. State, 692 S.W.2d 504 (Tex. Crim.App.1985); Marsh v. State, 684 S.W.2d 676 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Flores v.

Steve Huynh, Individually Yvonne Huynh, Individually Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC D/B/A Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm D/B/A Huynh Poultry Farm T & N Poultry Farm, LLC Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm Timmy Huynh, Individually And Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Frank Blanchard, Angelia Snow, Tanya Berry, Kimberly Riley, John Miller, Amy Miller, Chad Martinez, Emily Martinez, Mersini Blanchard, Malakoff Properties, LLC, and Ronny Snow

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2024

Campbell v. Wilder, 487 S.W.3d 146, 152 (Tex. 2016) (quoting Repka v. Am. Nat. Ins. Co., 186 S.W.2d 977, 980 (Tex. 1945)). II. … (quoting Brown v. Petrolite Corp., 965 F.2d 38, 51 (5th Cir. 1992))). In my view, the Court’s analysis strays from a proper balancing of the equities in two important respects.

Brown v. State

955 S.W.2d 276 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 1997

Brown, swpra at 567 (cit *278 ing Garcia v. State, 605 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.Cr.App.1980)). … Brown, supra, at 568 . Finally, the court of appeals cited Whitehead v.