Case law

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

269 N.C. 667 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Greene v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E. 2d 129 . … In Greene v. Board of Education, supra, Barnhill, J., later C.J., speaking for the Court, said: “We have repeatedly held that the presence of children on or near a highway is a warning signal to a motorist.

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

267 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1966

Fields v. Durham City Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699 , 111 S.E. 2d 910 . In Huff v. … G.S. 143-291 through 143-300.1. * * * ’ ” Fields v. Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699 , 111 S.E. 2d 910 .

Brown v. Board of Commissioners of Richmond County

222 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

Coleman v. Coleman, 148 N. C., 299 , 62 S. E., 415 ; Tyrrell County v. Holloway, 182 N. C., 64 , 108 S. E., 331 ; Bearden v. Fullam, 129 N. C., 477 , 40 S. E., 304 . In Coleman v. … In Ewbank v.

Board of Transportation v. Brown

296 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1978

Board of Transportation v. Brown

293 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1977

Board of Transp. v. Brown

249 S.E.2d 803 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1978

249 S.E.2d 803 (1978) BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION v. Neil E. BROWN and wife, Ingrid S. Brown. No. 77 Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 29, 1978. Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by James B. Richmond, Sp. Deputy Atty.

Buncombe County Board of Health v. Brown

271 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

Reade, J., in Doyle v. … To the same effect is Condry v. Cheshire, 88 N.C. 375 . Smith, C.J., in Lyon [Lynn] v.

Brown v. . Brown

124 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1899

State v. Massey, 97 N. C., 465 . … In Reed v. Reed (Appellate Court of Indiana), 33 N. E.

Brown v. . Brown

213 N.C. 347 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1938

J., in Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N. … Lanier, 4 Wallace, 447; Rolfe v. Delmar, 7 Rob., 80 ; Stewart v. Lothrop, 12 Gray, 52 ; Howard v. Harris, 8 Allen, 297 ; Pearce v. Brooks, L. R. 1 Exch., 213; Smith v. White, L. R. 1 Eq. Cases, 626.

Brown v. . Brown

121 N.C. 8 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

The action was brought by the plaintiff, Lizzie Brown, wife of J. W. Brown, in her own name, against the defendant, J. R. Brown, the father of her husband. … Heath v.

Brown v. Brown

205 N.C. 64 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1933

Brown and Mary Belle Brown do mutually agree to live separate and apart from one another, and in consideration of the said conveyance of real estate, to her, the said Mary Belle Brown agrees and by these presents does agree … Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N. C., 742 . See Sanders v. Sanders, 167 N. C., 317 ; Archbell v. Archbell, 158 N. C., 408 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Brown v. . Brown

205 N.C. 64 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1933

V. … Lentz v. Lentz , 193 N.C. 742 . See Sanders v. Sanders , 167 N.C. 317 ; Archbell v. Archbell , 158 N.C. 408 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Brown v. . Brown

168 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

Brown during their lives, he was not barred. Harris v. Bennett, 160 N. C., 339, 347 , and cases there cited. But there is another view of the matter. The deed of Joseph H. Brown to his brother, Gray L. … Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Johnson v. Farlow, 35 N. C., 84 ; Scarborough v. Scarborough, 122 N. C., 234 . It was said in Chatham v. Lansford, 149 N.

Brown v. . Brown

224 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1944

Brown could not be adjudged in contempt for failure to comply with the provisions of a separation agreement entered into prior to the institution of the divorce action, must be upheld under the authority of Davis v. … In Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N. C., 620 , 194 S. E., 278 , cited by appellant, the contempt proceedings for failure to make certain payments were predicated upon a valid judgment and willful disobedience thereof.

Brown v. Brown

264 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1965

Steelman v. Benfield, 228 N.C. 651, 46 S.E. 2d 829 . Plaintiff’s second assignment of error is: “The court erred in its explanation of the law on the subject to the jury. … Balint v. Grayson, 256 N.C. 490 , 124 S.E. 2d 364 ; Strong’s N. C. Index, Vol. 1, Appeal and Error § 19, p. 90 (Supplement p. 31).

Brown v. . Brown

106 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

And in Patterson v. … Brown (one of the plaintiffs); that Brown took possession under this assignment in 1874, and continued in actual possession until 1881; that on the 28th October, 1875, the executor of James R.

Brown v. . Brown

195 N.C. 315 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1928

Brown and Tulie C. Brown, father of Bruce Brown, nothing, and the will refers to the contracts in which they agree that they have received their full share. It is said in Patterson v. McCormick, 181 N. … Edmonson v. Leigh, 189 N. C., 196 ; Scales v. Barringer, 192 N. C., 94 ; Walker v. Trollinger, 192 N. C., 744 . For the reason given the judgment below is Affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

353 N.C. 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2000

The relevant facts in this case show that plaintiff Gladys Brown and defendant Carroll M. Brown married in 1976 and separated in 1997. … Thus, as held in Caldwell v. Caldwell, 93 N.C.

Brown v. . Brown

103 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

Reynolds v. Flinn, 1 Hay., 123 (106); Avery v. Strother, Conf. R., 434; Lovinggood v. Burgess, Busb., 407, and cases there cited. … In the case of Strother v.

Brown v. . Brown

182 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 14, 1921

S. v. Jones (at this term), citing Wilson v. Wilson, 114 N. C., 155 ; In re Smith's Will, 163 N. C., 466 ; Todd v. Mackie, 160 N. C., 352 ; *43 Allred v. Kirkman, ib., 392; Worley v. Logging Co., 157 N. C., 490 . … Shives v. Eno Cotton Mills, 151 N. C., 290 ; Brittain v. Westhall, 135 N. C., 492 ; Daniel v. R. R., 136 N. C., 517 ; Biles v. R. R., 139 N. C., 528 .