Case law

Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

486 A.2d 37 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1984

In Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276 (D.C.1980) (Brown I), we noted that two lawyers with intervenor Carr’s law firm, Iverson Mitchell and C. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, No. 13670 (D.C. July 15, 1983) (Brown II). Again, the division remanded the record to the BZA. Id., slip op. at 27.

Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

413 A.2d 1276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1980

See also Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470, 474 (1972) (contested case hearing inadequate because of Board’s failure to swear in witnesses). … See also Wilson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 380, 383-84 (1964).

Brown v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

19 A.3d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 2011

Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989). … Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors, 441 A.2d 246, 247-248 (D.C.1982).

GEORGE L. SYDNOR v. UNITED STATES

129 A.3d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2016

See Cannon v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C. 1993). 2 Thus, it is possible to commit burglary without violating the unlawful entry statute. See, e.g., Parker v.

United States v. William A. Nash, Jr. and David Lewis

100 A.3d 157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2014

See generally, e.g., Perkins v. … Mullin v. Brown, 115 P.3d 139, 143 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005) (“This court may not disregard a clear holding of our supreme court on the purported ground that the analysis supporting it is incomplete.”)

Brown v. Brown

343 A.2d 59 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1975

Brown, is your position the same? THE PLAINTIFF: As what counsel just said? THE COURT: Yes. THE PLAINTIFF: Yes. … Schanck v. Jones, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 229 F.2d 31 (1956); Brewood v. Cook, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 386, 207 F.2d 439 (1953).

Brown v. Brown

384 A.2d 632 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1977

See Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, 71 Mich.App. 213 , 247 N.W.2d 354, 355 (1976); Kruzel v. Podell, 67 Wis.2d 138, 151 , 226 N.W.2d 458, 464 (1975); Petition of Hauptly, 262 Ind. 150 , 312 N.E.2d 857, 859 (1974); Egner v. … Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, supra at 214, 247 N.W.2d at 355 ; Custer v. Bonadies, 30 Conn.Supp. 385 , 318 A.2d 639 (1974); Application of Halligan, supra; Petition of Hauptly, supra, 312 N.E.2d at 860 .

Kelby R. Gordon v. United States

120 A.3d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 2015

v. … v.

Brown v. Brown

75 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1950

Ct. 13 , 76 L.Ed. 537 ; Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 152 Md. 49 , 135 A. 840 ; Plant v. Plant, D.C.Mun.App., 57 A.2d 204 ; 2C.J.S., Divorce, § 328. 3 . Sistare v. Sistare, supra; Cotter v. … Cotter, 9 Cir., 225 F. 471 ; Phillips v. Kepler, 47 App.D.C. 384 ; see also Bar-her v. Barber, 21 How. 582 , 16 L.Ed. 226 ; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U.S. 183 , 21 S. Ct. 555 , 45 L.Ed. 810 . 4 . Sistare v.

Brown v. Brown

524 A.2d 1184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

See Gibson v. … Brown offered no convincing corroborating evidence to prove the existence of an agreement with his sister.

Bogan v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

749 A.2d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

See Smith v. United States, 597 A.2d 377 , 380 n. 2 (D.C.1991). The Board has been replaced by the U.S. … “We do not review the merits of the Board’s decision in denying parole, and are limited to a review of the procedures used by the Board in reaching its decision.” Smith v.

Brown v. Brown

260 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1970

Brown’s children. … Brown filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that his wife, having accepted the alimony payments, is estop-ped from appealing. Stein v. Stein, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 170 F.2d 162 (1948); Harris v.

Brown v. Brown

7 D.C. 221 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1869

Brown, a colored man, died seized of the lot of ground in dispute five or six years ago, leaving a widow, the defendant, but no children. … Ennis, showing that he had full authority from Amelia Brown to make the arrangement for compromise on the terms already stated, and therefore to appear for and answer the complainant’s bill in her name.

Brown v. MOORE-BROWN

991 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

Speight v. United States

671 A.2d 442 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1996

See Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1022 (D.C.1991); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See Brown, 590 A.2d at 1015 .

Winter v. Brown Ex Rel. Brown

365 A.2d 381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976

In Wood v. … In Abbe v.

Ramey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

997 A.2d 694 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

In Ramey v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 950 A.2d 38 (D.C.2008) (Ramey I), we l’emanded the case for the CRB to reconsider its decision in light of our decision in McCamey v. … See Mayers v.

Brown v. Does

207 A.3d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2019

Brown v. Proctor

182 A.3d 715 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2018

Brown v. Does

160 A.3d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2017