Case law

Estes v. Jones

203 Ga. 686 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 14, 1948

Culbreth v. Southwest Ga. Housing Authority, 199 Ga. 189 ( 33 S. E. 2d, 684 ). The Constitution of 1945 (art. VIII, sec. V, par. … V, par. I of the Constitution, in that they “restrict and limit the membership in the County Board of Education in a manner not contemplated or permitted by the Constitution.”

State ex rel. U-Haul Co. v. Zakaib

232 W. Va. 432 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2013

Syl. pt. 10, Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 , 724 S.E.2d 250 (2011) (“Brown I ”), overruled on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. … Brown, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 L.Ed.2d 42 (2012) (per curiam).

State v. Koloske

100 Wash. 2d 889 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1984

In State v. Koloske, 34 Wn. … State v. Alexis, supra.

State ex rel. Stine v. Brown County Board of Elections

101 Ohio St. 3d 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2004

Higgins v. … Clinard v. Greene Cty.

Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & Parole

491 Pa. 549 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1980

Board of Com’r. of Potter County v. Turner, 33 Pa.Cmwlth. 639 , 382 A.2d 1248 (1978). … A proceeding in mandamus is available to compel the Board of Probation and Parole to conduct a hearing or correct a mistake in applying the law. Davis v. Pa. Bd. of Parole, 484 Pa. 157 , 398 A.2d 992 (1979); Moore v.

Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Brown

182 Okla. 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

Brown h'ad been con- *244 v-icted of a crime involving turpitude and ordered that he be suspended for two years. … Brown was then of good repute and a man of high character. The board trying Dr.

Brown v. Brown by Beacham

244 Va. 319 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Sep 18, 1992

However, citing Green and Suttle v. Massie, 62 Va. (21 Gratt.) 356 (1871), and Stuart’s Heirs v. … Workers Pension Fund v.

Yates v. Township of McKean

593 Pa. 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2007

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

Thus, the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Board’s preferred definition of the word “during” was entitled to deference unless it is “clearly erroneous.” See Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000))). [J-62-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 3 21, 23; see Chamberlain v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 114 A.3d 385, 395 (Pa. 2015).

Flores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

11 Cal. 3d 171 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1974

Co. (1958) 50 Cal.2d 182, 188-189 [ 323 P.2d 753 ]; People v. … Select Base Materials v.

Domenico Calcaterra v. Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 2021

In Doe v. … Carolan v. Hill, 553 N.W.2d 882, 886 (Iowa 1996) (“Without 3The Board cites to earlier language in Portz v.

Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)

225 N.J. 400 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 2016

State v. Brown, 170 N.J. 138, 147 (2001) (quoting State v. Marrero, 148 N.J. 469, 484 (1997)). … Lockley v.

Cheever v. Brown & Brown

30 Ga. 904 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1860

Brown, the plaintiff, it is true, stated, under oath, that the corn was delivered to Cheever. But he was then upon his examination before the Court, and not testifying before the jury. … nothing of the character and condition of the books themselves, not a witness swears that he kept correct books, from his own knowledge of his dealings; nor does any one depose that he knew of any dealings between Cheever and Brown

Domenico Calcaterra v. Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 2021

In Doe v. … Carolan v. Hill, 553 N.W.2d 882, 886 (Iowa 1996) (“Without 3The Board cites to earlier language in Portz v.

State v. Jones

11 Fla. L. Weekly 67 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 20, 1986

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Prouse, 440 U.S. at 656-57 , 99 S.Ct. at 1397-98 ; Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. at 555 , 96 S.Ct. at 3081 ; Terry v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640-2641 ; State v. Superior Court In & For County of Pima, 143 Ariz. 45 , 691 P.2d 1073 (1984); State v.

Robertson v. Evans

400 So. 2d 1214 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

In McLean v. … Unlike McLean v.

Preserve Our Cody Neighborhoods, an unincorporated association; Terry and Diana Skinner; Dan and Konnie Haman; Patrick and Lynn Pitet; Sheila and Doug Peterson; Becky Stern; Siri and Tom Blake; Carla Egelhoff; Peggy Rohrbach; Brandi and Ty Nelson; Sarah Mcclure; and Chuck and Celeste Radtke v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole and City of Cody Planning, Zoning and Adjustment Board

2025 WY 64 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Jun 13, 2025

See Rosenberger v. … See, e.g., Goodman v.

Nathan Brown v. Lynette Brown

Michigan Supreme Court · May 21, 2014

BROWN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 148553 … BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered,

Neal v. Coe

35 Iowa 407 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 11, 1872

The plaintiff boarded at the hotel with the defendants, and knew that they were repairing the premises in controversy for a home. … Elston & Green v. Robertson, 23 Iowa, 208 ; Christy v. Dyer, 14 id. 438; Cole v. Gill, id. 527; Williams v. Swetland, 10 id. 51; Charless & Blow v. Lamberson, 1 id. 435.

Brown v. Brown

277 Ga. 594 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 16, 2003

Delbello v. Bilyeu, 274 Ga. 776, 777 ( 560 SE2d 3 ) (2002). The probate court also found that the will was improperly executed because Bobby Brown’s purported signature was in the wrong place on the will. … Miles v. Bryant, 277 Ga. 362 ( 589 SE2d 86 ) (2003). This error does not affect the probate court’s conclusion that the will is invalid because the purported signature of the testator is a forgery. Johnson v.