Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.81s
178 Miss. 57 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1937
Brown was to pay his servant, Mary L. … We think the evidence clearly establishes her claim in accordance with the announcements of this court in the cases of First National Bank v. Owen, 171 So. 4 , decided December 7, 1936, and Tarver v.
Cited 1 timesPublished6 S.D. 16 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1894
Jeansch v. Lewis, 1 S. D. 609, 48 N. W. 128 ; Brewing Co. v. Mielenz, 5 Dak. 136 , 37 N. W. 728 . … The court instructed the jury that, for all sales made by Mix, payment was to be made in paper for the sales that were so made, and not in money, and that defendants were entitled to select the notes, and that Mix or Brown
Cited 1 timesPublished9 L.R.A. 767 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 27, 1890
In Ellsworth v. Low, 62 Iowa, 178 , the owner was held to be in possession because he had used the land for taking timber and wood therefrom. In Sapp v. … Brown, whose name appeared on the tax list, is the same J. A. Brown who purchased at the tax sale, and who brings this action. That being the case, it is not required that Brown should serve notice upon himself.
Cited 2 timesPublished16 R.I. 604 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Aug 17, 1889
Brown’s attorney denies having had the conversation. … Story on Bailments, § 94 ; Rindge v. Inhabitants of Coleraine, 11 Gray, 157 , 162; Green v. Clarke, 12 N. Y. 343, 353 ; Smith v. James, 7 Cow. 328 ; Chesley v. St. Clair, 1 N. H. 189. *612 Marquis D. L.
Cited 1 timesPublished956 A.2d 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2008
956 A.2d 436 (2008) BROWN v. BEARD. No. 242 WAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. August 14, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Mich. 401 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1895
Tootle v. Taylor, 64 Iowa, 629 . … And see the following cases cited in the opinion: Fletcher v. Neudeck, 30 Minn. 125 ; Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 .
Cited 3 timesPublished41 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1902
Y. 227 ; Potter v. McDowell, 31 Mo. 62 ; Richardson v. Rhodus, 14 Rich. Law, 95; Weeks v. Hill, 88 Me. Ill ( 33 Atl. 778 ); Kehr v. Smith, 87 U. S. (20 Wall.) 31 . In Rose v. Dunklee, 12 Colo. … Kyle, 27 Or. 95 ( 39 Pac. 999 ); Flynn v. Baisley, 35 Or. 268 ( 57 Pac. 908 , 45 L. R. A. 645, 76 Am. St. Rep. 495 ); Mendenhall v. Elwert, 36 Or. 375 ( 52 Pac. 22 , 59 Pac. 805 ); Wright v.
Cited 3 timesPublished14 Wash. 443 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1896
Doane v. Broad Street Ass’n., 6 Mass. 332 . … Cushman v. U. S. Life Ins. Co., 70 N. Y. 76 . See, also, Merriam v. United States, 107 U. S. 437 .
Cited 6 timesPublished130 Miss. 715 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1922
Brown, sued appellee, L. H. … In construing this statute in Mortgage Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished481 Mich. 915 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2008
Markman, Justices v SC: 136104 … COA: 273062 Jackson CC: 06-003491-FH WILLIE RASHAWN BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order
Cited 0 timesPublished18 So. 3d 1037 · Supreme Court of Florida · Sep 9, 2009
18 So.3d 1037 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC09-1622. Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Decision without published opinion Review dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublished359 P.2d 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1961
McClure, to sue as a co-partner in Brown-McClure Lumber Company. … He purchased the materials from Brown-McClure Lumber Company on invoices bearing both its name and the names of Roy Brown and Melvin McClure.
Cited 3 timesPublished36 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1840
It appears, upon the pleadings, that the plaintiff, Brown, gave to the plaintiff, Campbell, his bond with surety for the amount of the debt of Long, one of the defendants, to Campbell, for which Brown was Long’s surety; and … that thereupon Campbell assigned the judgment at law to the plaintiff Cowan, in trust for Brown.
Cited 5 timesPublished135 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1930
And so it was held in Chapman v. … excusing the delay in the filing of a reply, this court will not review the action of the trial court in refusing to permit a reply to be filed after the time provided in the code, and it was also held in Bank of Beaverton v.
Cited 4 timesPublished242 Ga. 456 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 30, 1978
V, Par. II (Code Ann. § 2-6202). Expenditure of county funds to procure the passage or defeat of constitutional amendments is not specifically permitted. … Harrison v. Rainey, 227 Ga. 240 ( 179 SE2d 923 ) (1971); DeVaughn v. Booten, 146 Ga. 836 ( 92 SE 629 ) (1917). For example, in Harrison v.
Cited 1 timesPublished121 Ala. 150 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1898
—Smith v. Collins & Griffeth, 94 Ala. 394 ; Chipman v. Glennon, 98 Ala. 263 ; Mobile Savings Bank v. McDonnell, 89 Ala. 434 . … -Goodbar, White & Co. v. Daniel, 88 Ala. 588 ; Thomas v. Glazener, 90 Ala. 588 ; Lindsay v. Cooper, 94 Ala. 170 ; Clemmons et al. v. Cox, 114 Ala. 350 .
Cited 5 timesPublished235 So. 2d 458 · Mississippi Supreme Court · May 18, 1970
Here the procedure approved in Le Barron v. State, 107 Miss. 663 , 65 So. 648 (1914) was followed. … The “Weathersby” rule [Weathersby v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna