Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

4.61s

  • Brown v. Ela

    67 N.H. 110 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 5, 1891

    Baker v. Beers, 64 N. H. 102, 105; Evans v. Mason, 64 N. H. 98, and authorities cited.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    247 Ala. 288 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 20, 1945

    True, in Powell v. … The question of continuance on account of the absence of defendant’s witness Brown, who appears to have been out of the State, was a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court. Sanders v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    19 So. 3d 310 · Supreme Court of Florida · Sep 17, 2009

    19 So.3d 310 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC09-1668. Supreme Court of Florida. September 17, 2009. Decision without published opinion review dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McNeil

    19 So. 3d 310 · Supreme Court of Florida · Sep 17, 2009

    19 So.3d 310 (2009) BROWN v. McNEIL. No. SC09-1653. Supreme Court of Florida. September 17, 2009. Decision without published opinion review dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bateh

    362 So. 2d 841 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 25, 1978

    Insurance Co. v. Cushman, supra. … See Brown v. Bateh, 331 So.2d 671 (Ala. 1976). As such, the rights between Brown and Bateh were fixed at the date of sale; at that date, the period within which Brown could redeem was one year.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    99 R.I. 582 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · May 12, 1965

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pagels v. Brown

    996 So. 2d 1074 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 10, 2008

    996 So.2d 1074 (2008) Edward PAGELS v. Mary Ellen BROWN. No. 2008-C-2100. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 10, 2008. *1075 Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Romano v. Brown

    125 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940

    Rodgers v. Harelick and Harelick, Inc., 124 N. J. L. 577. … , or of persons interested in the estate for such time as the board may determine.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    673 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009

    673 S.E.2d 662 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Tashaun BROWN. No. 537P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 2009. Tashaun Brown, Pro Se. Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Philip E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hugg v. Brown

    6 Whart. 468 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1841

    See Good v. Good, ( 5 Watts, 117 .) … Murray v. Williamson, ( 3 Binn. 135 .) Wolf v. Beales, (6 S. & R. 244.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Boschert v. Brown

    72 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1872

    It will he sufficient to refer to the case of The Manufacturers’ and Mechanics’ Bank v. … That Brown and Taggart were sureties on the contract in question, not guarantors, is ruled in effect in Reigart v. White, 2 P. F.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wiedemann v. Brown

    190 Minn. 33 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Nov 3, 1933

    Corp. v. Calhoun Water Co. 64 A. L. R. 1550, commencing on page 1556. … While in North Star Land Co. v. Taylor, 129 Minn. 438 , 152 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Campbell

    1 Hopk. Ch. 233 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 4, 1824

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2009

    BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2009. K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Brown

    41 Tex. 446 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

    (Smith v. Sherwood, 2 Tex., 460 ; Graham v. Roder, 5 Tex., 141 ; Oliver v. Chapman, 15 Tex., 400 ; Kolb v. Bankhead, 18 Tex., 228 ; Hedgepeth v. Robertson, 18 Tex., 858 ; Reed v. Samuels, 22 Tex., 114 ; Neill v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Haralson v. Brown

    178 Miss. 57 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1937

    Brown was to pay his servant, Mary L. … We think the evidence clearly establishes her claim in accordance with the announcements of this court in the cases of First National Bank v. Owen, 171 So. 4 , decided December 7, 1936, and Tarver v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McCaul

    6 S.D. 16 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1894

    Jeansch v. Lewis, 1 S. D. 609, 48 N. W. 128 ; Brewing Co. v. Mielenz, 5 Dak. 136 , 37 N. W. 728 . … The court instructed the jury that, for all sales made by Mix, payment was to be made in paper for the sales that were so made, and not in money, and that defendants were entitled to select the notes, and that Mix or Brown

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Brown

    964 A.2d 893 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2009

    964 A.2d 893 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. [1] No. 809 MAL (2006). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pool

    9 L.R.A. 767 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 27, 1890

    In Ellsworth v. Low, 62 Iowa, 178 , the owner was held to be in possession because he had used the land for taking timber and wood therefrom. In Sapp v. … Brown, whose name appeared on the tax list, is the same J. A. Brown who purchased at the tax sale, and who brings this action. That being the case, it is not required that Brown should serve notice upon himself.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Trask

    999 So. 2d 757 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 30, 2009

    BROWN and Felton Lewis v. Josephine B. TRASK, Albert Brown, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. No. 2008-C-2707. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 30, 2009. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.