Case law

Brown v. Murphy

51 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1889

An inspection of the proceedings of the council at the meeting in question shows that the provisions of this ordinance were not then observed, for no evidence of advertisement was produced before the board. … The efficacy of such ordinances to control the manner in which the council shall exercise its powers is asserted without hesitation in Winants v. Bayonne, 15 Vroom 114 , and Volk v. Newark, 18 Id. 117 .

People v. Brown

482 Mich. 987 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2008

Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 136621 … COA: 283433 Oakland CC: 2007-213521-FH TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On

State v. Brown

300 Wis. 2d 193 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2007

732 N.W.2d 859 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. No. 2005AP2450. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. March 14, 2007. Petition for review denied.

Barker v. Brown

15 Iowa 70 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 12, 1863

State v. Brown

254 Conn. 943 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Oct 25, 2000

Inman v. Brown

59 N.M. 196 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1955

Betenbough were sureties on the supersedeas bond of appellant and her husband Lynn Brown in an action pending in Lea County wherein Henry Reid recovered judgment against the Browns in the amount of $2,101.85. … Reid v. Brown, 56 N.M. 65 , 240 P.2d 213 . Subsequently, appellees were required to pay the judgment, whereupon it was assigned to them by Reid.

Brown v. Dooley

95 Minn. 146 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 9, 1905

This has been the construction which has heretofore been given to this statute in the following cases: Newell v. Dart, 28 Minn. 248 , 9 N. W. 732 ; Dole v. Wilson, 39 Minn. 330 , 40 N. W. 161 ; Spencer v. … Lamberton v. Grant, 94 Me. 508 , 48 Atl. 127 .

Brown v. Blake

46 Conn. 549 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 15, 1879

From time immemorial that member of the board of selectmen of the several towns in this state whose name stood first upon a plurality of the ballots cast for such board, has been spoken of by the people as the first selectman … Hull v. Hillard, 42 Conn., 168 , it was in effect decided that there must be a distinct creation of the office before it could receive judicial recognition.

Brown v. Guillot

146 La. 46 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 3, 1919

And we adhere to the opinion which we expressed in the case of Howell v. … The rule issued herein is now made absolute, and the district judge is directed to act upon the relator’s petition or prayer for a jury trial in the case of Levi Brown v.

Engel v. Brown

69 N.H. 183 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 5, 1897

Brown v. … Brown v. Latham, supra; Wainman v. Kynman, 1 Exch. 118; Tippetts v. Heane, 1 C. M. & R. 252. An express new promise may be limited by conditions introduced into it. Stowell v. Fowler, 59 N. H. 585; Betton v.

Brown v. Taunton

169 Ga. 240 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 4, 1929

Henry v. Means, 137 Ga. 153 ( 72 S. E. 1021 ). 2. … This case differs in this respect from Holt v.

Brown v. State

24 So. 3d 559 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 30, 2009

24 So.3d 559 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC09-2179. Supreme Court of Florida. November 30, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Appeal dismissed.

Brown v. Melton

29 So. 3d 868 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 28, 2009

In McGill v. … See Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v.

Weinn v. State

326 S.W.3d 189 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2010

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … In Ex parte Ervin v.

Sheaffer v. Brown

281 Pa. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1924

Brown being incompetent owing to the death of Sheaffer, and she being “a party to the thing or contract in action,” for the same reason her husband was disqualified: Bittner v. Boone, 128 Pa. 567 ; Myers v.

Brown v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1959

P.C. 2d 730, Sec. 1588; Rice v. State, 123 Texas Cr. Rep. 258 , 58 S.W. 2d 98 ; Anderson v. State, 144 Texas Cr. Rep. 26 , 161 S.W. 2d 88 .

Com. v. Brown

960 A.2d 454 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2008

960 A.2d 454 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 372 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 29, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Brown v. Paul

100 Kan. 319 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Apr 7, 1917

In Howe v. … Brown and Lola F. Gregg, and reversed as to the wife, Clara A.

Brown v. Matthews

3 La. Ann. 198 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 15, 1848

Malone purchased the property from the lessors subject to the conditions of the lease, hut after its expiration sold the property to Brown, without paying for the improvements. … We have been referred by the appellee to the cases of Andry v. Guyol, 13 La. 8 , and Diggs v.

Brown v. Womack

181 Miss. 66 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1938

Nor is there any aid for the appellant in the case of Wheeler v. … See Cole v. Johnson, 53 Miss. 94 ; Gaines v. Kennedy, 53 Miss. 103 . At the time the notice was served on him, it was purely a question of law.