Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.86s
242 La. 384 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 15, 1962
State v. Lowry, 153 La. 177 , 95 So. 596 ; State v. Kaufman, 211 La. 517 , 30 So.2d 337 ; State v. Michel, 225 La. 1040 , 74 So.2d 207 ; State v. Biegert, 227 La. 1100 , 81 So.2d 410 ; State v. … . *403 The motion in arrest 'of judgment reads: “And now, after verdict against the defendant, Joseph Brown, and before sentence, comes the said Joseph Brown, through his attorney John P.
Cited 6 timesPublished251 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968
State v. Chinn, 231 Or 259, 266 , 373 P2d 392 (1962). State v. Elkins, supra ( 245 Or 279 ), is in accord. … State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 386 , 388 P2d 282 (1964). Affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished326 Pa. 190 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1937
writer of this opinion, had to puzzle over the question in every action of tort whether a cause of action Avas in trespass or in case, the invitation to again explore the boundary, a very narrow one between them (Berry v. … See also Com. v. Bay State Milling Co., 312 Pa. 28 , 167 A. 307 ; McNitt v. Phila., 325 Pa. 73 , 189 A. 300 . In this vieAV of the act, AAdiich we think the correct one, the service Avas valid.
Cited 4 timesPublished766 N.W.2d 824 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2009
Hathaway, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 138453 … COA: 279073 Oakland CC: 2006-209679-FH SALATHIEL REZAR BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On
Cited 0 timesPublished125 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940
Rodgers v. Harelick and Harelick, Inc., 124 N. J. L. 577. … , or of persons interested in the estate for such time as the board may determine.
Cited 2 timesPublished673 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009
673 S.E.2d 662 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Tashaun BROWN. No. 537P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 2009. Tashaun Brown, Pro Se. Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Philip E.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 Haw. 22 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1906
Brown $500, Lorrin A. Andrews $1, George P. *23 Kamauoha $1. (Signed) Walter Muller, Foreman.” … Swan, 63 Me. 323 ; Halsey v.
Cited 3 timesPublished137 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1890
her, as her next of kin and only heirs at law, her father and mother, William Brown and Ann Maria Brown, who were duly substituted on the record as plaintiffs, and thereupon judgment was entered on the verdict. … Brown, the property in controversy was sold and conveyed by the sheriff to Charles H.
Cited 4 timesPublished482 Mich. 1063 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2008
Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 136635 … BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and
Cited 0 timesPublished482 Mich. 1070 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2008
Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 137192 … COA: 284961 Genesee CC: 07-021342-FH PATRICK WAYNE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order
Cited 0 timesPublished672 S.E.2d 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2009
BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2009. K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.
Cited 0 timesPublished516 P.2d 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973
Hiner v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., Okl., 355 P.2d 549 (1960). See also Gulf Oil Company v. Woodson, Okl., 505 P.2d 484, 489 (1972). … Brown, District Judge of Cleveland County is granted and he is prohibited from undertaking further proceedings in the action now pending in his court. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C.
Cited 4 timesPublished964 A.2d 893 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2009
964 A.2d 893 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. [1] No. 809 MAL (2006). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished5 Iowa 532 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 9, 1858
Commonwealth v. Chabbock, 1 Mass., 144 . Judgment reversed.
Cited 3 timesPublished672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009
BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 6, 2009. Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 Tenn. 64 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873
Brown a party plaintiff. The defendant then moved the court to dismiss the suit, because the jury had been sworn to try the issue between Clinton A. Brown and wife, plaintiffs, and A. L. … In the case of Eakin v. Burger, 1 Sneed, 424 , this court, speaking of the act of 1852, ch. 152, carried into the Code as sec. 2869, say: “ This is a very strong and universal statute of jeofails.
Cited 1 timesPublished190 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941
Prince v. Gosnell, 47 Okla. 570 , 149 P. 1162 ; McIntosh v. Board of Com’rs, 179 Okla. 610 , 67 P. 2d 10 . … Continental Insurance Co. v. Portwood, 184 Okla. 22 , 84 P. 2d 435 ; Ketcham v. Oil Field Supply Co., 99 Okla. 201 , 226 P. 93 ; Farris v. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co., 176 Okla. 331 , 55 P. 2d 432 .
Cited 6 timesPublished134 Tex. Crim. 147 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 2, 1938
Lamantia v. The State of Texas, Opinion No. 19274, this day delivered [ 133 Tex. Crim. 573 ], we sustained a complaint and information charging the offense in substantially the same language as it is herein charged.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna