Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

2.86s

  • State v. Brown

    242 La. 384 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 15, 1962

    State v. Lowry, 153 La. 177 , 95 So. 596 ; State v. Kaufman, 211 La. 517 , 30 So.2d 337 ; State v. Michel, 225 La. 1040 , 74 So.2d 207 ; State v. Biegert, 227 La. 1100 , 81 So.2d 410 ; State v. … . *403 The motion in arrest 'of judgment reads: “And now, after verdict against the defendant, Joseph Brown, and before sentence, comes the said Joseph Brown, through his attorney John P.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    251 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968

    State v. Chinn, 231 Or 259, 266 , 373 P2d 392 (1962). State v. Elkins, supra ( 245 Or 279 ), is in accord. … State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 386 , 388 P2d 282 (1964). Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Personeni

    326 Pa. 190 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1937

    writer of this opinion, had to puzzle over the question in every action of tort whether a cause of action Avas in trespass or in case, the invitation to again explore the boundary, a very narrow one between them (Berry v. … See also Com. v. Bay State Milling Co., 312 Pa. 28 , 167 A. 307 ; McNitt v. Phila., 325 Pa. 73 , 189 A. 300 . In this vieAV of the act, AAdiich we think the correct one, the service Avas valid.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    766 N.W.2d 824 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2009

    Hathaway, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 138453 … COA: 279073 Oakland CC: 2006-209679-FH SALATHIEL REZAR BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Romano v. Brown

    125 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940

    Rodgers v. Harelick and Harelick, Inc., 124 N. J. L. 577. … , or of persons interested in the estate for such time as the board may determine.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    673 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009

    673 S.E.2d 662 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Tashaun BROWN. No. 537P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 2009. Tashaun Brown, Pro Se. Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Philip E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Brown

    18 Haw. 22 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1906

    Brown $500, Lorrin A. Andrews $1, George P. *23 Kamauoha $1. (Signed) Walter Muller, Foreman.” … Swan, 63 Me. 323 ; Halsey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • High v. Brown

    46 Iowa 259 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 14, 1877

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Downing

    137 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1890

    her, as her next of kin and only heirs at law, her father and mother, William Brown and Ann Maria Brown, who were duly substituted on the record as plaintiffs, and thereupon judgment was entered on the verdict. … Brown, the property in controversy was sold and conveyed by the sheriff to Charles H.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    482 Mich. 1063 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2008

    Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 136635 … BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    482 Mich. 1070 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2008

    Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 137192 … COA: 284961 Genesee CC: 07-021342-FH PATRICK WAYNE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Campbell

    1 Hopk. Ch. 233 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 4, 1824

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2009

    BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2009. K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Brown

    516 P.2d 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

    Hiner v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., Okl., 355 P.2d 549 (1960). See also Gulf Oil Company v. Woodson, Okl., 505 P.2d 484, 489 (1972). … Brown, District Judge of Cleveland County is granted and he is prohibited from undertaking further proceedings in the action now pending in his court. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Brown

    964 A.2d 893 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2009

    964 A.2d 893 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. [1] No. 809 MAL (2006). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ibbitson v. Brown

    5 Iowa 532 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 9, 1858

    Commonwealth v. Chabbock, 1 Mass., 144 . Judgment reversed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

    BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 6, 2009. Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lyon v. Brown

    65 Tenn. 64 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

    Brown a party plaintiff. The defendant then moved the court to dismiss the suit, because the jury had been sworn to try the issue between Clinton A. Brown and wife, plaintiffs, and A. L. … In the case of Eakin v. Burger, 1 Sneed, 424 , this court, speaking of the act of 1852, ch. 152, carried into the Code as sec. 2869, say: “ This is a very strong and universal statute of jeofails.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCleary v. Brown

    190 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941

    Prince v. Gosnell, 47 Okla. 570 , 149 P. 1162 ; McIntosh v. Board of Com’rs, 179 Okla. 610 , 67 P. 2d 10 . … Continental Insurance Co. v. Portwood, 184 Okla. 22 , 84 P. 2d 435 ; Ketcham v. Oil Field Supply Co., 99 Okla. 201 , 226 P. 93 ; Farris v. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co., 176 Okla. 331 , 55 P. 2d 432 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    134 Tex. Crim. 147 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 2, 1938

    Lamantia v. The State of Texas, Opinion No. 19274, this day delivered [ 133 Tex. Crim. 573 ], we sustained a complaint and information charging the offense in substantially the same language as it is herein charged.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.