Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.13s
368 So. 2d 536 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 9, 1979
See: Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. Bennett , 267 Ala. 538 , 103 So.2d 177 (1958); Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. Weems , 266 Ala. 415 , 96 So.2d 741 (1957); Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. … See: Berry v. Druid City Hospital Board , 333 So.2d 796 (Ala. 1976); Green v. The Hospital Building Authority of City of Bessemer , 294 Ala. 467 , 318 So.2d 701 (1975).
Cited 6 timesPublished165 Kan. 507 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jul 10, 1948
Brown, S. H. Marcus and John D. Guthridge, plaintiffs below, owned a herd of cattle. In the- month of *508 April, 1943, L. G. Dye and E. M. Dye, brothers, agreed to purchase certain of these cattle for $11,750. … Likewise, there is no proof of joint adventure, which is essentially a relationship of partnership (Flitch v. Boyle, 147 Kan. 600 , 78 P. 2d 9 .)
Cited 3 timesPublished482 Mich. 987 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2008
Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 136621 … COA: 283433 Oakland CC: 2007-213521-FH TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On
Cited 0 timesPublished300 Wis. 2d 193 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2007
732 N.W.2d 859 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. No. 2005AP2450. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. March 14, 2007. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished765 N.W.2d 25 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 27, 2009
Hathaway, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v … SC: 138477 COA: 280721 Ingham CC: 07-000045-FC BRUCE KENT BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Cited 0 timesPublished29 So. 3d 868 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 28, 2009
In McGill v. … See Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished97 Nev. 251 · Nevada Supreme Court · May 19, 1981
As we stated in a similar context in Wells v. … Alberding v. Brunzell, 601 F.2d 474, 476 (9th Cir. 1979); NRS 11.020.
Cited 1 timesPublished6 Blackf. 69 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1841
Brown, deceased, praying for the proper writ of execution against the real estate of said Brown, on a judgment obtained in the same Court by the petitioners against the administrators of the deceased.
Cited 1 timesPublished960 A.2d 454 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2008
960 A.2d 454 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 372 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 29, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished362 So. 2d 841 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 25, 1978
Insurance Co. v. Cushman, supra. … See Brown v. Bateh, 331 So.2d 671 (Ala. 1976). As such, the rights between Brown and Bateh were fixed at the date of sale; at that date, the period within which Brown could redeem was one year.
Cited 4 timesPublished545 So. 2d 975 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 12, 1989
We did not reach this issue in Nall v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. … I am aware that Breaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins.
Cited 1 timesPublished3 La. Ann. 198 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 15, 1848
Malone purchased the property from the lessors subject to the conditions of the lease, hut after its expiration sold the property to Brown, without paying for the improvements. … We have been referred by the appellee to the cases of Andry v. Guyol, 13 La. 8 , and Diggs v.
Cited 1 timesPublished181 Miss. 66 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1938
Nor is there any aid for the appellant in the case of Wheeler v. … See Cole v. Johnson, 53 Miss. 94 ; Gaines v. Kennedy, 53 Miss. 103 . At the time the notice was served on him, it was purely a question of law.
Cited 4 timesPublished229 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1948
Jordan , 205 N.C. 618 , 172 S.E. 319 ; Copney v. Parks , 212 N.C. 217 , 193 S.E. 21 ; and that, hence, the motion for judgment on the pleadings must be considered in the light of the common law. … See Williams v. Mfg. Co. , 153 N.C. 7 , 69 S.E. 902 , and Tarpley v. Arnold , 226 N.C. 679 , 40 S.E.2d 33 .
Cited 4 timesPublished55 Ga. 41 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 15, 1875
Brown, administrator of Shelton, to Jack Brown, trustee for complainant, Jack Brown being her husband. This deed is dated 2d November, 1858. … Brown, being a married woman, made the deed set out in defendant’s answer, then Kimbrough got no title to the same, and no right by which he could hold the land in opposition to Mrs. Brown.”
Cited 1 timesPublished919 N.E.2d 551 · Indiana Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2009
919 N.E.2d 551 (2009) STATE v. BROWN. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 11, 2009. Transfer denied. All Justices concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna