Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

1.02s

  • Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Marc R. Engelmann

    840 N.W.2d 156 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 22, 2013

    The underlying misconduct is similar to but more egregious than that in Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Bieber, 824 N.W.2d 514 (Iowa 2012). … The same day we decided Bieber, we filed our decision in Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Woodbury v. Zoning Board of Warwick

    78 R.I. 319 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jun 29, 1951

    Harrison v. Zoning Board of Review, 74 R. I. 135. … The language of the ordinance giving the board power to make such exceptions is broad, general, and has no reference to time limits. In Morris v. Zoning Board of Review, 52 R.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    307 So. 2d 186 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 16, 1975

    307 So.2d 186 (1975) Raymond Pierre BROWN, Jr., Petitioner, v. Evelyn BROWN, Respondent. No. 46463. Supreme Court of Florida. January 16, 1975. Certiorari dismissed. 300 So.2d 719 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of Brown v. Brown

    139 Iowa 219 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 9, 1908

    Brown died on or about June 25, 1906, at the age of forty-eight, leaving surviving two daughters, Zella Stinson Snider and Hazel Brown, a minor, and his divorced wife, Ida Brown, whom we shall call the proponent. … Brown as would authorize her to propose the will for probate.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Marriage of Brown v. Brown

    316 N.W.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Mar 5, 1982

    Brown, respondent in this action for dissolution of marriage, appeals from an order of the district court awarding certain property to the petitioner Earl F. Brown. … As a result, Earl Brown was awarded approximately 86% of the net equity of the homestead and Beverly Brown, approximately 14%.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Perry v. School District No. 81

    54 Wash. 2d 886 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1959

    In Gordon v. Board of Education, 78 Cal. … See Gordon v. Board of Education, supra (concurring opinion).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown & Brown v. Theresa A. Johnson

    25 N.Y.3d 364 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2015

    . ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 92 Brown & Brown, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Theresa A. Johnson, et al., Respondents. (AD No. … Plaintiff Brown & Brown, Inc. (BBI) is a Florida corporation. Its New York subsidiary, plaintiff Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (BBNY), is licensed to handle insurance in New York.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. State

    94 Nev. 605 · Nevada Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1978

    Good v. United States, 378 F.2d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 1967). The primary contention of counsel on appeal is that the trial court did not adequately inquire into the problem. He cites Brown v. … United States v. Sexton, 473 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1973); Good v. United States, supra; United States ex rel. Baskerville v. Deegan, supra; United States v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Kunish

    529 Pa. 206 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1992

    The Superior Court relied upon our decision in Commonwealth v. Brown, 455 Pa. 274 , 314 A.2d 506 (1977), which has been overruled. See Commonwealth v. Jones, 520 Pa. 385 , 554 A.2d 50 (1989). … We expressly overruled our prior decision in Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, which had relied upon decisions of the United States Supreme Court predating U.S. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Miller v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 18-0011

    278 Neb. 1018 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2009

    Board of Governors, 204 Neb. 383 , 281 N.W.2d 925 (1979). [10] See, Moser v. Board of Education, 204 Neb. 561 , 283 N.W.2d 391 (1979); Witt v. School District No. 70, 202 Neb. 63 , 273 N.W.2d 669 (1979). [11] Roth v. … No. 0001, supra note 4, 265 Neb. at 747 , 658 N.W.2d at 927 , quoting Trolson v. Board of Ed. of Sch. Dist. of Blair, 229 Neb. 37 , 424 N.W.2d 881 (1988). [14] Cross v. Board of Governors, supra note 9. [15] Witt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown & Bros. v. Brown

    58 Conn. 85 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Oct 30, 1889

    , and signed by said Philo Brown. … Brown, the only son of Philo Brown and one of the executors of his will, had charge until 1884.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC

    202 A.3d 482 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 17, 2019

    Force Holdings, LLC v. … See Blish v.

    Cited 129 timesPublished
  • Rork v. Szabo Foods

    436 N.E.2d 64 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1982

    Rork v. Szabo Foods, supra, at 1382. It cannot be said that it is always “obvious” that the Board has simply “placed more weight on some evidence than on another.” Id. Experience has taught us otherwise. In Talas v. … Rork v. Szabo Foods, supra, at 1381-2.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Wilson

    454 Mich. 421 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1997

    See Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161, 169 ; 97 S Ct 2221 ; 53 L Ed 2d 187 (1977). … The people argue that the second prosecution was valid under the exception in Brown, supra at 169 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hickey v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty.

    274 Neb. 554 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2007

    In Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 5 the U.S. … Appeals Bd., 238 Neb. 39 , 469 N.W.2d 120 (1991). 4 See Barnett v. City of Scottsbluff, supra note 3. 5 Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra note 1. 6 See, id.; Nebraska Pub. Emp. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Schulze v. Coykendall

    218 Kan. 653 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 24, 1976

    The complaint had been filed with the Board of Education. A public hearing was held. The board found the statements were true. … (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra; Kennedy v. Mid-Continent Telecasting, Inc., supra; and Coleman v. MacLennan, supra.)

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Schulze v. Board of Education, 221 Kan. 351 (1977)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services

    377 S.C. 489 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 5, 2008

    See Hair v. … Given the Parole Board was authorized to establish these criteria, we do not believe the Parole Board changed the law in violation of the Ex Post Facto clause. See State v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Girard College Trusteeship

    391 Pa. 434 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1958

    by the Fourteenth Amendment, citing Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 : see Pennsylvania v. Board of Trusts, 353 U. S. 230 .

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brown ex rel. Brown

    26 So. 3d 1167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 26, 2009

    Brown at the time of the accident. … Brown’s policy, she merely needs to be away from Mr. Brown’s home and enrolled in school.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Estes v. Jones

    203 Ga. 686 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 14, 1948

    Culbreth v. Southwest Ga. Housing Authority, 199 Ga. 189 ( 33 S. E. 2d, 684 ). The Constitution of 1945 (art. VIII, sec. V, par. … V, par. I of the Constitution, in that they “restrict and limit the membership in the County Board of Education in a manner not contemplated or permitted by the Constitution.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.