Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.65s
12 N.Y.3d 713 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2009
12 N.Y.3d 713 (2009) PEOPLE v. BROWN. Court of Appeals of New York. Decided June 9, 2009. Motion for leave to appeal denied [*] . NOTES [*] Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished959 A.2d 318 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 2008
959 A.2d 318 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 209 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 8, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished229 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1948
The land joins the land of Brown, Jr.' … Warlick v. Lowman , 103 N.C. 122 , 9 S.E. 458 .
Cited 4 timesPublished185 Vt. 650 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Apr 15, 2009
971 A.2d 674 (2009) CHANCE v. BROWN. No. 08-419. Supreme Court of Vermont. April 15, 2009. Appeal disposed of without published opinion or memorandum decision. Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished207 P.3d 432 · Utah Supreme Court · Apr 29, 2009
207 P.3d 432 (2009) CLINE v. BROWN. No. 20081041. Supreme Court of Utah. April 29, 2009. Petition for certiorari denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished213 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938
Baker v. Edge, 174 N. C., 100 . A will and codicil are to be construed together so that the intention of the testator can be ascertained from both. Brown v. Brown, 195 N. … Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 134 . The codicil does not revoke this, but the sale to pay the $1,000 to the church is a supplemental bequest and that the payment be in cash.
Cited 3 timesPublished263 Ala. 440 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1955
Birmingham Electric Co. v. Carver, [ 255 Ala. 471 ] 52 So.2d 200 .” … See Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge, 207 Ala. 86 , 93 So. 548 .
Cited 4 timesPublished60 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864
After this arrangement, the friends of Whitaker left the house, and thereupon Brown, having remained, renewed the negotiation and effected the alleged sale of his land. … Burroughs v. Jenkins , 62 N.C. 33 ; Elliott v. Logan, id. , 163; Hartly v. Estis, id. , 167; Earl v. Bryan, id. , 278; Hill v. Brewer , 76 N.C. 124 . See, also, Harshaw v. McCombs , 63 N.C. 75 .
Cited 1 timesPublished208 Ala. 476 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 23, 1922
This section is a remedial statute, Barrington v. … Southern Supply Co. v. Standard Equipment Co., 105 Ala. 582 , 51 South. 789 .
Cited 7 timesPublished150 Wash. 449 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1929
About May 1, 1920, Brown and Mrs. … Worden v. Worden, 96 Wash. 592 , 165 Pac. 501 ; Swingley v. Daniels, 123 Wash. 409 , 212 Pac. 729 .
Cited 2 timesPublished629 So. 2d 1163 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 20, 1993
In re Brown, Joe; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 274-345; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KW-0684. Denied.
Cited 1 timesPublished155 Miss. 833 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1930
The appellant, Bonnett, sought to show by the record of the board of supervisors, and the members of the board, that the board had never entered any order declaring the stock law to be in force in that county, which was excluded … In Anderson v.
Cited 2 timesPublished35 So. 3d 31 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 15, 2010
35 So.3d 31 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC10-699. Supreme Court of Florida. April 15, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Review dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublished161 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933
Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 293 , 171 P. 34 ; City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .
Cited 5 timesPublished190 Neb. 421 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1973
Nichol v. Yocum, 173 Neb. 298 , 113 N. W. 2d 195 (1962). “ ‘. . .
Cited 4 timesPublished350 Mont. 559 · Montana Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2009
213 P.3d 787 (2009) BROWN v. MAHONEY. No. OP 09-0005. Supreme Court of Montana. January 28, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished176 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1918
Farmer v. Willard, 75 N. C., 401 ; Threadgill v. Commissioners, 116 N. C., 616 ; S. v. Carlton, 107 N. C., 956 , and cases cited. We will consider plaintiff’s second exception, as to costs, hereafter. … This is not like the case of Huntsman v. Lumber Co., 122 N. C., 583 . As to the costs. The court divided all costs, except those in the claim and delivery proceeding, between the parties.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna