Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

2.19s

  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cline v. Brown

    207 P.3d 432 · Utah Supreme Court · Apr 29, 2009

    207 P.3d 432 (2009) CLINE v. BROWN. No. 20081041. Supreme Court of Utah. April 29, 2009. Petition for certiorari denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toms v. . Brown

    213 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938

    Baker v. Edge, 174 N. C., 100 . A will and codicil are to be construed together so that the intention of the testator can be ascertained from both. Brown v. Brown, 195 N. … Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 134 . The codicil does not revoke this, but the sale to pay the $1,000 to the church is a supplemental bequest and that the payment be in cash.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chastain v. Brown

    263 Ala. 440 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1955

    Birmingham Electric Co. v. Carver, [ 255 Ala. 471 ] 52 So.2d 200 .” … See Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge, 207 Ala. 86 , 93 So. 548 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Garrow v. . Brown

    60 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

    After this arrangement, the friends of Whitaker left the house, and thereupon Brown, having remained, renewed the negotiation and effected the alleged sale of his land. … Burroughs v. Jenkins , 62 N.C. 33 ; Elliott v. Logan, id. , 163; Hartly v. Estis, id. , 167; Earl v. Bryan, id. , 278; Hill v. Brewer , 76 N.C. 124 . See, also, Harshaw v. McCombs , 63 N.C. 75 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Berow v. Brown

    208 Ala. 476 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 23, 1922

    This section is a remedial statute, Barrington v. … Southern Supply Co. v. Standard Equipment Co., 105 Ala. 582 , 51 South. 789 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    629 So. 2d 1163 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 20, 1993

    In re Brown, Joe; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 274-345; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KW-0684. Denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Avery

    63 Fla. 376 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1912

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    35 So. 3d 31 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 15, 2010

    35 So.3d 31 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC10-699. Supreme Court of Florida. April 15, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Review dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paasch v. Brown

    190 Neb. 421 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1973

    Nichol v. Yocum, 173 Neb. 298 , 113 N. W. 2d 195 (1962). “ ‘. . .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Clark

    27 Vt. 576 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1855

    In the cases of Green v. Shurtliff, 19 Vt. 592 , *578 Holmes v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    157 Tex. Crim. 127 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1952

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gibbons

    37 Iowa 654 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 15, 1873

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clay v. Brown

    264 N.Y. 543 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1934

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. Brown

    97 Neb. 545 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1915

    Brown in these transactions, declined to convey the property directly to Mrs. Brown, and insisted on returning it, at her request, to Mr. Brown from whom he received the title. This was done, and Mr. … Brown was entitled to a one-half interest in the real estate of her husband, which he could not will or convey aw-ay from her. Gaster v.

    Overruled in part by Arent v. Arent, 104 Neb. 562 (1920)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Staley v. Brown

    244 Miss. 825 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1962

    See also Campbell v. Yazoo and M. V. R. R. Co., 199 Miss. 309 , 24 So. 2d 531 (1946). … Phil Grossmayer Co. v. Campbell, 214 Ore. 265 , 328 P. 2d 320 (1958); Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty’s Treasury v. Bankers’ Trust Co., 197 Misc. 381 , 94 N. Y. S. 2d 658 (1949); Gendler v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McKay

    125 Cal. 291 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1899

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    41 Me. 535 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

    Commonwealth v. Dawney, 9 Mass. 520 . It was proper that the writ should be returnable to a term of the Court holden for the transaction of criminal business. 2. … It is a general principle that a recognizance should recite the cause of the caption. 9 Mass., before cited; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. 232 ; Wingate, in error, v. Commonwealth, 5 Cush. 446 ; State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Draxten v. Brown

    197 Minn. 511 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 19, 1936

    Brown, Helen Brown, and Bessie Goldie. The Browns appeal from the orders denying their motions in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts or a new trial. … The case of Duffey v. Curtis, 193 Minn. 358 , 258 N.W. 744 , is not in point.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Brown

    205 Ill. 606 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1903

    Krupp v. Brand, 200 Ill. 403 . … (Smith v. Mace, 137 Ill. 68 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.