Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.36s
254 Ark. 162 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 2, 1973
In Hoelzeman v. … Everett v. Coleman, 211 Ark. 515 , 201 S.W. 2d 30 . Filing within that period is excused only when, as indiciated in Hoelzeman v.
Cited 3 timesPublished235 Ark. 500 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1962
Free v. Wood, 137 Kan. 939 , 22 P. 2d 978 ; Markowsky v. Newman, (Tex. Civ. App.) 138 S. W. 2d 896 . … The trial court erred in counting, for Brown, the maiden vote of Eugene Penney, since his affidavit of age, required by statute, could not be found. Ark. Stats., § 3-227; Logan v. Moody, 219 Ark. 697 , 244 S.
Cited 3 timesPublished132 Ill. 413 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1890
Brown, five-ninths thereof; Lavina Brown, Albert Melton, Florence Melton and James Melton, ■each one-ninth thereof.; and that in default thereof execution iksue therefor.” … In a note to Graham v. Price, 13 Am. Dec. 199 , in which the authorities, on the effect of a variance between an execution and the judgment on which it is based are collated and commented upon by Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublished11 Vt. 569 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jul 15, 1839
Such is the view taken of this subject, by this court, in the case of Spear v. Ditty, 8 Vt. R. 419.
Cited 2 timesPublished21 Me. 385 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1842
Bean v. Parker, 17 Mass. R. 591 . … Cutter v. Whittemore, 10 Mass. R. 442 ; Scott & al. v. Whipple & als. 5 Greenl. 336; Haskins & al. v. Lombard & als. 16 Maine R. 140.
Cited 2 timesPublished110 Nev. 846 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1994
Brown appealed to this court and we issued an order of remand on September 6, 1988, vacating Brown’s judgment of conviction and directing the district court to conduct a hearing pursuant to Miller v. … Wilson v. State, 105 Nev. 110, 115 , 771 P.2d 583, 586 (1989) (citing Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 603 (1978)).
Cited 10 timesPublished202 Miss. 202 · Mississippi Supreme Court · May 26, 1947
Smith v. State, 197 Miss. 802 , 20 So. (2d) 701, 706 , 161 A. L. R. 1. Consequently the court below should have granted the request of appellant for a verdict of not guilty. Reversed, and the appellant discharged.
Cited 1 timesPublished27 Vt. 583 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1855
There is a case in Aiken’s reports, State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished970 A.2d 1147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2009
970 A.2d 1147 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. No. 609 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. April 7, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished254 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1961
Bradham v. Trucking Co., 243 N.C. 708 , 91 S.E. 2d 891 ; Badders v. Lassiter, 240, N.C. 413, 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Hinshaw v. Pepper, 210 N.C. 573 , 187 S.E. 786 . … Carrigan v. Dover, 251 N.C. 97, 110 S.E. 2d 825 . In fixing driver responsibility, Chief Justice Winborne, in Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252 , 116 S.E. 2d 804 , Justice Parker, in Carrigan v.
Cited 4 timesPublished159 Miss. 893 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1931
Green was in his drug store at a time when one Parker purchased “Extract of Ginger” from Brown, and according to Green’s testimony, Brown assured. … However, we are not unmindful of the fact that in the case of Pillars v. R. J.
Cited 3 timesPublished27 Vt. 576 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1855
In the cases of Green v. Shurtliff, 19 Vt. 592 , *578 Holmes v.
Cited 1 timesPublished157 Tex. Crim. 127 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1952
Cited 1 timesPublished214 P.3d 787 · Montana Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2009
214 P.3d 787 (2009) BROWN v. MAHONEY. No. OP 09-0020. Supreme Court of Montana. April 7, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished29 So. 3d 1118 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 16, 2010
29 So.3d 1118 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC09-1651. Supreme Court of Florida. February 16, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished97 Neb. 545 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1915
Brown in these transactions, declined to convey the property directly to Mrs. Brown, and insisted on returning it, at her request, to Mr. Brown from whom he received the title. This was done, and Mr. … Brown was entitled to a one-half interest in the real estate of her husband, which he could not will or convey aw-ay from her. Gaster v.
Overruled in part by Arent v. Arent, 104 Neb. 562 (1920)Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna