Case law

Brown v. Brown

213 Ark. 58 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 1948

Brown did not have his glasses. Mrs. Brown handed Mr. Brown his glasses. Witness read the deed to Mr. Brown several times as he did not understand the habendum clause. … Brown sign the deed, but did not hear him give any instructions about it. It is essential to the valadity of a deed not only that it be executed, but it is required also that it be delivered. In the case of Cleveland v.

Brown, D. v. Brown, P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DIANA BROWN, : No. 645 MAL 2020 : Respondent … Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v

Commonwealth v. Dobrolenski

460 Pa. 630 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1975

Commonwealth v. … In the words of Justice Frankfurter, writing for the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

68 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

If the complainant, Clara Brown, have any interest or estate in the lands, their issues or profits, or any right to occupy them, which she has not forfeited, her remedy at law was adequate and complete. … Brown. This judgment to take effect as of July 16th, 1878, when this cause was submitted.

Luchejko v. City of Hoboken

207 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 2011

See Brown v. Saint Venantius Sch., 111 N.J. 325, 335 , 544 A.2d 842 (1988) (“[W]e acknowledge the well-settled principal that municipal ordinances do not create a tort duty, as a matter of law.”); Lodato v. … State v. Brown, 190 N.J. 144, 157 , 919 A.2d 107 (2007) (quoting Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 443 , 120 S.Ct. 2326, 2336 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405, 419 (2000)); see also Flomerfelt v.

Brown v. Brown

169 Ala. 671 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 8, 1910

City Council of Watervliet v. Town Board of Colonie

3 N.Y.3d 508 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004

SEQRA’s primary purpose “is to inject environmental considerations directly into governmental decision making” (Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d 674, 679 [1988]). … Perales, 86 NY2d 361, 367 [1995]; Matter of Astoria Generating Co. v General Counsel of N.Y.

Brown v. MOORE-BROWN

991 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

Brown v. Brown

277 Ala. 217 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 22, 1964

Co. v. Crocker, 95 Ala. 412 , 11 So. 262 . ‘Courts and juries should rather weigh than count the testimony of witnesses.’ Graham v. State, 92 Ala. 55 , 9 So. 530 ; Life Ass’n v. … We have held in Farish v.

Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.

269 Mass. 102 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 30, 1929

No stock was offered to Brown [the plaintiff] because his services to the company did not warrant a reward. … Neither salary increases, accounting changes, or additions to surplus, were made with any thought to defraud Brown or to enrich the defendants.”

City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

789 P.2d 1287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1990

No. 1 v. Board of County Comm’rs, 674 P.2d 547, 550 (Okla.1983), govern. … City of New Orleans v. Fisher, 180 U.S. 185, 197 , 21 S.Ct. 347, 352 , 45 L.Ed. 485, 492 (1901); Board of Educ. v. Salt Lake County, 659 P.2d 1030, 1036 (Utah 1983); State ex rel. Bd. of County Comm’rs v.

Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles

47 Cal. 4th 1298 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2010

by the local appeals board before resort is made to the courts.” 7 (Sunrise Retirement Villa v. … City and County of San Francisco (1985) 37 Cal.3d 859, 865 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 226 , 693 P.2d 811 ]; Board of Supervisors v.

Lannay v. Wilson

30 Md. 536 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 1869

Lauderdale County School Board v. Brown ex rel. A.B.

106 So. 3d 807 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2013

The matter was pending before the school board, and if the board approved the recommendation, the students could request a hearing before the school board to continue the suspension until such hearing occurred. … On July 25, 2012, the youth court denied the board’s and superintendent’s motion to stay pending appeal, and the school board moved this Court to impose a stay on the underlying judgment until a final decision on the merits

Clarke v. Board of Appeals of Nahant

338 Mass. 473 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 3, 1959

See Gordon v. Guernsey, 316 Mass. 106, 108 . See also Davis & O’Connor Co. v. Shell Oil Co. Inc. 311 Mass. 401, 403 . … See Corbett v. Derman Shoe Co., ante, 405, 409.

Brown v. Brown

211 Ark. 241 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1947

The statute is discussed at length in Davis v. Cullums, 205 Ark. 390 , 168 S. W. 2d 1103 . In 1932 John Oliver Brown married Martha, a widow with two sons and a daughter. … Corney v. Corney, 97 Ark. 117 , 133 S.

Brown v. Brown

193 Minn. 211 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 4, 1935

Brown (now Louise M. … See Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , 229 N. W. 868 .

State v. School Bd. of Sarasota County

561 So. 2d 549 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 26, 1990

561 So.2d 549 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. … State v.

Devereux v. Berger

264 Md. 20 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 14, 1972

In Metropolitan Acceptance Corporation v. Irving D. Berger, No. 204, Sept. … In Devereux v.

Warren v. Sidney's Estate

183 Miss. 669 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1938

Brown v. Walker (Miss.), 11 So. 724 ; Isom v. Canedy, 128 Miss. 64 , 88 So. 485 . … Ward v. Ward, 124 Miss. 697 , 87 So. 153 ; Williams v. Moorehead, 116 Miss. 653 , 77 So. 658 ; Martin v. Perkins, 56 Miss. 204 ; Pratt v. Hargreaves, 77 Miss. 892 , 28 So. 722 , 78 Am. St. Rep. 551 ; Didlake v.