Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

7.24s

  • Mangum v. . Brown

    200 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

    Clary v. Clary, 24 N. C., 78 ; Bost v. Bost, 87 N. C., 477 ; Horah v. Knox, ibid., 483; Beard v. R. R., 143 N. C., 136 ; Rakestraw v. Pratt, 160 N. C., 436 . … Cromwell v. Logan, 196 N. C., 588 ; Inge v. R. R., 192 N. C., 522 ; Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 118 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Hunt, 187 N. C., 157 ; Gates v. Max, 125 N. C., 139 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Conway

    201 Iowa 117 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 12, 1926

    See Mayo v. Halley, 124 Iowa 675 ; 1 Corpus Juris 612, Section 56 et seq. … See Dillon v. Lee, 110 Iowa 156 ; Kennedy v. Citizens’ Nat. Bank, 128 Iowa 561 ; Schoening v. Schwenk, 112 Iowa 733 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    47 So. 3d 1287 · Supreme Court of Florida · Oct 13, 2010

    47 So.3d 1287 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. SC10-1477. Supreme Court of Florida. October 13, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Mandamus dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Phelps

    103 Mass. 313 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1869

    The defendant contends that the case of Stebbins v. Leowolf, 3 Cush. 137 , is a decisive authority against the plaintiffs’ claim in respect to these shares.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jaeger

    46 Idaho 680 · Idaho Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

    This action arose out of the same circumstances involved in the eases of Dale v. Jaeger, 44 Ida. 576 , 258 Pac. 1081 , and Steadman v. Jaeger, 44 Ida. 582 , 258 Pac. 1082 . … Plaintiff herein is the same Brown mentioned in the opinion in Dale v. Jaeger. The appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baker

    108 Wash. 161 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1919

    In United States v. … by the owner, thereby acquires a right to compel the owner to sell, or such an interest in the property as to deprive the owner of the power to control its disposition.’ ” See, also, the Yosemite Valley Case [Hutchings v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    314 Wis. 2d 283 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2008

    758 N.W.2d 927 (2008) STATE v. BROWN. No. 2007AP2699. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 11, 2008. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dunn

    38 Neb. 52 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1893

    Brown. The district court of Lan *53 caster county, after a trial to a jury and a finding by them that the defendant was guilty, rendered judgment of restitution against Brown and he brings the case here on error. … Co. v. Reams, 37 Neb., 423 .) The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Livingston v. Brown

    100 Okla. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

    Bishop on Contracts, page 50, section 116; Campbell v. Rotaring, 42 Minn. 115 , 43 N. W. 795 , 12 L. R. A. 278; Dair v. U. S. 16 Wall. 1 , 21 L. Ed. 492 ; Bishop on Contracts, sections 382, 383. … Selsor v. Arnbrecht, 57 Okla. 732 , 157 Pac. 908 ; First Natl. Bank of Addington v. Shell, 57 Okla. 425 , 157 Pac. 317 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    124 Ohio St. 3d 1431 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jensen

    231 Mont. 340 · Montana Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1988

    Brown must come forward with evidence of a genuine issue of material fact after the Williston Group met its initial burden of establishing the lack of same. Pretty on Top v. … Moser v. Fuller (1938), 107 Mont. 424, 430, 86 P.2d 1, 3 (citing U.S. v. Throckmorton (1878), 98 U.S. 61, 25 L.Ed.2d 93) ; Minter, at 236.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nechtow v. Brown

    369 Mich. 460 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1963

    Defendant Fred Brown claims that the real-estate agent told him they had permission to park on plaintiffs’ lot 8. … We find no error in the court’s ruling in regard to efforts or statements made in attempting a settlement after this dispute arose, and call attention to our decision in Smith v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    592 So. 2d 621 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 22, 1991

    "It was, therefore, error for the circuit court to dismiss Brown's petition and to tax Brown with the costs of appeal without affording Brown an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Brown's disciplinary hearing complied … This case is remanded to the circuit court for the sole purpose of taking testimony to ascertain whether Brown's disciplinary hearing was tape recorded in compliance with Rule 403." *Page 623 Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    219 Miss. 748 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1954

    In Jones v. … In the case of McNair v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    339 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 10, 1995

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    160 Conn. 346 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 26, 1971

    Brown, 157 Conn. 398 , 254 A.2d 570 , this court dismissed the appeal on the ground that because the trial court had dismissed the habeas corpus petition it lacked authority to grant a late appeal. … These include Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S. Ct. 1967 , 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199 , and Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440 , 89 S. Ct. 1127 , 22 L. Ed. 2d 402 , applying the United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    312 Mo. 340 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 6, 1925

    [Bower v. Daniel, 198 Mo. l. c. 317 and cases.] Other cases equally affirmatory of our limitations in appellate proceedings are: St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. Deemar, 174 Mo. 122 ; Scott v. Smelting Co., 187 Mo. … App. l. c. 356; Crossland v. Admire, 149 Mo. 650 ; Hill v. Combs, 92 Mo. App. 242 . In the Hill case, Smith, P.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Little v. Brown

    36 Ariz. 194 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1930

    Brown & Company, a partnership, of which Brown was a member, and not to Eugene J. Brown. This contention is based upon the fact that the certificate was made out in the name of the former. … The first case so deciding is Bryan v. Pinney, 3 Ariz. 34 , 21 Pac. 332 , in which the history of this provision is given. The ruling in Bryan v. Pinney was followed in Roberts v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment

    218 Wis. 2d 396 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · May 27, 1998

    See Arndorfer v. Board of Adjustment, 162 Wis. 2d 246, 254 , 469 N.W.2d 831 (1991). … Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of City of O'Fallon, 388 N.E.2d 877, 881 (Ill. App.

    Abrogated on other grounds by State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment, 269 Wis. 2d 549 (2004)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 2009

    985 A.2d 645 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 STATE v. BROWN. No. C-00393 September Term 2009, 64,684. Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 3, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.