Case law

Brown v. State

42 So. 3d 540 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2010

See Thomas v. … Williams v.

Brown v. Devine

240 Ark. 838 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 1966

See Marshall v. Irby, 203 Ark. 795 , 158 S. W. 2d 693 ; American Excelsior Laundry Company v. Derrisseaux, 204 Ark. 843 , 165 S. W. 2d 598 ; Little Rock Towel and Linen Supply Company v. … Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. Haskew, 194 Ark. 549 , 108 S. W. 2d 908 ; Roth v. Prewitt, 225 Ark. 466 , 283 S. W. 2d 155 . The Chancellor was correct in dismissing the complaint for an injunction.

Miller v. Brown

170 Ark. 949 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 12, 1926

Glass v. Blackwell, 48 Ark. 50 , and Albright v. Mickey, 99 Ark. 147 . … Pickett v. Ferguson, 45 Ark. 177 ; National Exchange Bank of Tiffin v. Wiley, 195 U. S. 257 ; and Chicago Life Insurance Co. v. Cherry, 244 U. S. 25 .

State v. Brown

229 P.3d 398 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 6, 2010

229 P.3d 398 (2010) STATE v. BROWN. No. 102701. Supreme Court of Kansas. May 6, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

McKibbin v. Brown

15 N.J. Eq. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1861

The decree of the Chancellor was affirmed by the following ;vote: For affirmance —Judges Brown, Combs, Clawson, Haines, Ogden, Swain, Vredenburgh, Whelpley, Wood — 9. For reversal —Cornelison, Kennedy, Van Dyke—3.

People v. Brown

13 N.Y.3d 920 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2010

Martin v. Brown

91 Iowa 574 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 4, 1894

Brown.” … Jackson v. Mott, 76 Iowa, 267 , 41 N. W. Rep. 12 .

Ceravolo v. Brown

364 So. 2d 1155 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 1, 1978

This Court outlined the requirements for slander per se in Marion v. … The rules enunciated in this case have been consistently followed within this state and were most recently reaffirmed in Brown v. W.R.M.A. Broadcasting Co., Inc. , 286 Ala. 186 , 238 So.2d 540 (1970). See also Bryan v.

Brown v. State

364 Md. 37 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 17, 2001

See Brown v. State, 132 Md.App. 250 , 752 A.2d 620 (2000). … See Dorsey v.

Mangum v. . Brown

200 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

Clary v. Clary, 24 N. C., 78 ; Bost v. Bost, 87 N. C., 477 ; Horah v. Knox, ibid., 483; Beard v. R. R., 143 N. C., 136 ; Rakestraw v. Pratt, 160 N. C., 436 . … Cromwell v. Logan, 196 N. C., 588 ; Inge v. R. R., 192 N. C., 522 ; Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 118 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Hunt, 187 N. C., 157 ; Gates v. Max, 125 N. C., 139 .

Commonwealth v. Brown

605 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2009

Brown v. Conway

201 Iowa 117 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 12, 1926

See Mayo v. Halley, 124 Iowa 675 ; 1 Corpus Juris 612, Section 56 et seq. … See Dillon v. Lee, 110 Iowa 156 ; Kennedy v. Citizens’ Nat. Bank, 128 Iowa 561 ; Schoening v. Schwenk, 112 Iowa 733 .

Brown v. Jaeger

46 Idaho 680 · Idaho Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

This action arose out of the same circumstances involved in the eases of Dale v. Jaeger, 44 Ida. 576 , 258 Pac. 1081 , and Steadman v. Jaeger, 44 Ida. 582 , 258 Pac. 1082 . … Plaintiff herein is the same Brown mentioned in the opinion in Dale v. Jaeger. The appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff.

State v. Brown

302 Conn. 944 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Oct 18, 2011

31 A.3d 382 (2011) 302 Conn. 944 STATE of Connecticut v. Tyrone BROWN. Not in source. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided October 18, 2011. G. Douglas Nash, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J.

Brown v. Mitchell

225 Ga. 115 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 6, 1969

Brown, alleged insofar as essential here the following. The parties entered into an agreement, copy attached, for the sale of land. … Estes v. Winn, 136 Ga. 344 ( 71 SE 470 ). The description here is patently insufficient to identify the particular land referred to in the sales contract.

Brown v. Sams

119 Tenn. 677 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1907

The cases of Clovers v. Sawyers, 1 Head, 157 , and Stallcup v. Bradly, 3 Cold., 407 , were decided before the statute of 1875 was enacted. … Fisher v. Baldridge, 91 Tenn., 418 , 19 S. W., 227 ; McCampbell v. State, 116 Tenn., 107 , 93 S. W., 100 . Tbe latter act creates a greater necessity for partition fences than existed before it was passed.

State v. Brown

74 Ohio St. 3d 630 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1996

Brown v. Baker

108 Wash. 161 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1919

In United States v. … by the owner, thereby acquires a right to compel the owner to sell, or such an interest in the property as to deprive the owner of the power to control its disposition.’ ” See, also, the Yosemite Valley Case [Hutchings v.

State v. Brown

48 Iowa 382 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 20, 1878

Brown v. Ravenscraft

88 Md. 216 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 29, 1898

Brown and Frederick W. Bruñe were both dead and that Clara M. Brown and Emily S. Bruñe, two of the plaintiffs, who signed said agreement, were the widows respectively of Geo. Wm. Brown and Frederick W. Bruñe. … Brown and Emily S. Bruñe, had no apparent title to the land.