Case law

Brown v. Goulding

55 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

Brown defaulted. There was trial to a jury upon the issues presented by the answer of E. M. Brown, resulting in a verdict for defendant. … (Bennett v. Kiowa County Bank, 44 Okla. 575 , 145 Pac. 807 .) The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

McGill v. Brown

72 Wash. 514 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1913

Jami-son & Company, a corporation, against the receiver in the case of McGill v. Brown et al., to require the receiver in that case to pay over to E. P. … The receiver has appealed. *515 There is substantially no dispute upon the facts, which are as follows: On May 4, 1910, Neta Brown, Florence C. Dawson and C. N.

State v. Brown

315 Wis. 2d 722 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2009

764 N.W.2d 531 (2009) STATE v. BROWN. No. 2007AP1383-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. February 10, 2009. Petition for review denied.

Martin v. Brown

91 Iowa 574 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 4, 1894

Brown.” … Jackson v. Mott, 76 Iowa, 267 , 41 N. W. Rep. 12 .

State v. Brown

14 S.C. 380 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 10, 1881

and did not allege that the offence was committed “ contra formam statnti;" but, after stating the charge plainly, commanded the constable, as follows: “ These are therefore to command you to apprehend the said Charles Brown … In 1868, an act was passed delaring that “ the boards of county commissioners have poAver, and they are hereby authorized to appoint sijecial commissioners to lay out public highways in those cases where they shall be satisfied

State v. Brown

111 N.J.L. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1933

State v. O’Leary, 110 N. J. L. 36. The judgment is reversed to the end that there may be a venire de novo. For affirmance — None.

Lee v. Brown

264 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1973

Thomas v. … In Downey v.

Essex v. Brown

139 Neb. 435 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1941

This is an action in equity instituted originally by Kathryn Essex, plaintiff, against Birdie Brown, formerly Birdie Essex,. defendant. … Gay v. Reynolds, supra.

Commonwealth v. Life Assurance Co.

419 Pa. 370 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1965

See Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, supra, at 527, 79 S. Ct. at 441 ; State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs of Indiana v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537 , 51 S. Ct. 540, 543 (1931); Brown-Forman Co. v. … See Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, supra at 527, 79 S. Ct. at 441 ; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 563, 573 , 30 S. Ct. 578, 580 (1910).

Crump v. Brown

246 Miss. 631 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1963

She relies principally upon the cases of Avery v. Collins, 171 Miss. 636 , 157 So. 695 ; Jones v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, 211 Miss. 34 , 50 So. 2d 902 , and Moat v. Black, 230 Miss. 337 , 92 So. 2d 845 . … Callaway v. Haddad, 226 Miss. 177 , 83 So. 2d 825 ; Moore v. Taggart, 233 Miss. 389 , 102 So. 2d 333 . (Hn 5) Appellee contends that the exact instruction was granted in the case of Cinderella Foods v.

Brown v. Arthur

202 Va. 624 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Apr 24, 1961

South Hill Motor Co. v. Gordon, 172 Va. 193, 203 , 200 S. E. 637, 642 ; Rhoades v. Meadows, 189 Va. 558, 562 , 54 S. E. 2d 123, 124 ; Conrad v. Thompson, 195 Va. 714, 719 , 80 S. E. 2d 561, 565 . … Brown crossed Main Street diagonally, then this was negligence on the part of Alfred R. Brown. That if you believe from the preponderance of the evidence that Alfred R.

Sims v. Brown

46 Okla. 767 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

Laws 1910), void as to said Brown. In the case of Miller v. Fryer, 35 Okla. 145 , 128 Pac. 713 . … The Supreme Court of the United States, in McDougal v. McKay et al., 237 U. S. 372 , 35 Sup. Ct. 605, 59 L. Ed. —, Pigeon et al. v. Buck et al., and Roberts v. Underwood et al., 237 U. S. 386 , 35 Sup. Ct. 608, 59 L.

Brown v. State

364 Md. 37 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 17, 2001

See Brown v. State, 132 Md.App. 250 , 752 A.2d 620 (2000). … See Dorsey v.

State v. Brown

131 Ark. 127 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1917

Cook v. State, 80 Ark. 495 ; Price v. State, 82 Ark. 25 ; Hamer v. State, 104 Ark. 606 . (2-3) Appellee prosecuted an appeal to the circuit court, and in so doing, carried the whole case up for trial de novo.

Maddox v. Brown

9 Port. 118 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1839

Brown v. State

947 A.2d 1062 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Dec 17, 2007

See Stigars v. State, 674 A.2d 477, 481 (Del.1996) (reviewing an alleged Constitutional violation de novo). 5 . Haug v. State, 406 A.2d 38, 43 (Del.1979). 6 . See Smith v. State, 918 A.2d 1144, 1150 (Del.2007); Brown v. … See McNeil v.

Brown v. State

473 S.W.2d 683 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1971

Brown, herein referred to as movant, with six prior out of state offenses, did on January 31, 1964, enter pleas of guilty to one charge of rape and three of attempted rape. … Such a record does not call for consideration of Pate v. Robinson, 383 U. S. 375 , 86 S.Ct. 836 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 ; Brizendine v. Swenson, D.C., 302 F.Supp. 1011 or Franklin v. State, Mo., 455 S.W.2d 479 .

Brown v. Smith

240 Ark. 1042 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1966

In Kelly’s Heirs v. … In Neal v. Neal, 194 Ark. 226 , 106 S.

Brown v. Green

618 P.2d 140 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

Dayton v. Wyoming National Bank, 1875, 1 Wyo. 263, 269 . … In early January, 1980, the plaintiff moved for substitution, Rule *142 17, W.R.C.P., to show Harold Brown, d/b/a Well Servicing Equipment and Supply, plaintiff, on the ground that while Brown was sole shareholder in Well

Wimberly v. Brown

918 So. 2d 1020 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 9, 2006

In re Brown, Rene J. et al.; Zeta Home Health Care Inc.; Pacific Employers Health Care Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. … See Farrar v. Haedicke, 97-2923 (La.12/2/97), 702 So.2d 690 . This finding is not clearly wrong.