Case law

McKee v. Brown

43 Ill. 130 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1867

Brown, the husband of defendant in error, owned the premises in fee in his life-time, and, that she is his widow. … In the case of Shattuck v.

Brown v. Ehlers

130 Neb. 918 · Nebraska Supreme Court · May 8, 1936

Bridget Dunne, with whom he was boarding, made all the payments. … Co. v. Cross, 7 Fed.

State v. Brown

384 So. 2d 425 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 19, 1980

384 So.2d 425 (1980) STATE of Louisiana v. Earl BROWN. No. 66263. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 19, 1980. *426 William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Aubert D. Talbot, Dist. … Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). In North Carolina v.

People v. Brown

783 N.W.2d 324 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2010

Hathaway, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 141027 … COA: 297479 Oakland CC: 2007-213521-FH TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN, Defendant-Appellant

Brown v. Grant

39 Minn. 404 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Nov 16, 1888

Thompson v. First Nat. Bank, 111 U. S. 529 , (4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689;) Denithorne v. Hook, 112 Pa. St. 240, ( 3 Atl. Rep. 777 ;) Wood v. Pennell, 51 Me. 52 ; Hefner v. Palmer, 67 Ill. 161 . … Brown was himself a witness in the case. But, without passing upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the case of Brown in this respect, we will refer to the case of Wright.

Brown v. Pryor

133 Kan. 129 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 9, 1931

, The trust deed was foreclosed by Brown in March, 1926, and the notes of Pryor were paid by Brown after Pryor had left Missouri and after the foreclosure of the trust deed. … (Thisler v. Mackey, 65 Kan. 464 , 70 Pac. 334 ; Macksville State Bank v. Ehrlich, 119 Kan. 796 , 241 Pac. 462 , and cases cited.)

Brown v. Graham

242 S.C. 491 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jun 11, 1963

Young v. Levy, 206 S. C. 1, 32 S. E. (2d) 889 ; Samuel v. Young, 214 S. C. 91, 51 S. … I had knew John and Levi Brown as John and Levi Brown for years, but I had no idea that they were the sons,of Elliott McCutchen.

Taylor v. Brown

112 Ga. 758 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 25, 1901

In the case of Boyd v. … In the case of Riggins v.

Brown v. Hubert

100 N.H. 194 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Apr 27, 1956

It was stated in Cote v. Company, 85 N. … Gagne v. Greenhouses, 99 N. H. 292, 296; Hirsch v. Company, 97 N. H. 480, 486.

Warren v. Brown

57 S.D. 528 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1930

Code 1919, the state canvassing board as constituted by section 7295, Rev. … W. 252 ; In re Burnette (1906) 73 Kan. 609 , 85 P. 575 ; Gantt v. Brown (1912) 244 Mo. 271 , 149 S. W. 644 , Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1283; In re Bowers (1916) 137 Tenn. 193 , 192 S. W. 919 ; State v.

English v. Brown

9 Ala. 504 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1846

[Williams & Ivey v. Sims, 8 Porter, 579 ; Owen v. Brown, 2 Ala. … [Wharton v. French’s, 9 Porter, 232 ; Williamson v. Powell, Ib. 493; Stephenson v. Roper, 5 Ala. Rep. 182 .]

Fengar v. Brown

57 Conn. 60 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 4, 1889

Brown’s life use. … The defendants attempt to justify it by the case of Lillibridge v. Barber, 55 Conn., 366 .

Brown v. Johnson

101 Wis. 661 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1899

Crook v. Henry, 25 Wis. 569 ; Bigelow v. Sickles, 75 Wis. 427 . Such last-named communications are still preserved inviolate on the ground of public policy, but the rule goes no further. Williams v. … Baldwin, 7 Vt. 503 ; McGuire v. Maloney, 1 B. Mon. 224 .

Patane v. Brown

792 A.2d 1086 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2002

Patane came back outside while Brown was picking up branches from the bush, and she grabbed one of the branches that Brown was holding. … Brown’s second argument cannot succeed. [¶ 11] Brown also argues that the court erred in finding that Patane had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Brown committed criminal threatening.

Brown v. Tull

65 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1915

Border v. Carrabine, 24 Okla. 609 , 104 Pac. 906 ; Wallace v. Killian, 40 Okla. 631 , 140 Pac. 162 . … Co. v. Lemair, 55 Tex. Civ. App. 244 , 119 S. W. 1162.

Brown v. Lillie

6 Nev. 244 · Nevada Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1870

See also (Merritt v. Judd, 14 Cal. 59 .) In Hill v. … (See Peck v. Brown, 5 Nev. 81 .) As an exception to this rule may be mentioned growing crops, which although deemed mere personal chattels, still pass to the vendee by conveyance of the land.

State v. Brown

364 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2010

705 S.E.2d 365 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Nathan BROWN. No. 504P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 15, 2010. Karen A. Blum, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Joe Nathan Brown, for Brown, Joe Nathan. Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

EMBERS v. Brown

420 Md. 464 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 1, 2011

23 A.3d 896 (2011) 420 Md. 464 EMBERS v. BROWN. Pet. Docket No. 96. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Denied July 11, 2011. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

Brown v. State

305 Ark. 53 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1991

See Brown v. State, 304 Ark. 98 , 800 S.W.2d 424 (1990). … Brown, 304 Ark. at 100-101 , 800 S.W.2d at 426 .

Brown v. State

940 N.E.2d 830 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2010

940 N.E.2d 830 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. Supreme Court of Indiana. November 16, 2010. Transfer denied. All Justices concur.