Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

3.47s

  • Brown v. State

    453 S.W.2d 171 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1970

    We find the evidence sufficient, Singleton v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 71 , 253 S.W.2d 441 ; Dove v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 402 S.W.2d 913 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Becknall

    58 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1860

    The ease is narrowed down to the claims of Clara Becknall and Uoah Brown. … In respect to Brown, we are of opinion that his right, under the mortgage is presumed to be abandoned from lapse of time.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dean v. Brown

    201 Ala. 465 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 1918

    McDaniel v. Sullivan & Bramlett, 144 Ala. 583 , 39 South. 355 . [2] The averments of fraudulent representations contained in said plea were sufficient. Roddam v. Brown, ante, p. 109, 77 South. 403 ; § 4298, Code 1907. … In Hayes v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Brown

    12 La. Ann. 266 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1857

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Popky

    413 Pa. 236 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1964

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    203 N.J. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 2010

    3 A.3d 1226 (2010) 203 N.J. 437 STATE v. BROWN. Nos. C-15 September Term 2010, 065825 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 10, 2010. Petition for Certification Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Brown

    122 Ga. 571 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 24, 1905

    Jordan v. State, 119 Ga. 443 ; Davis v. State, 120 Ga. 843 ; McFarlin v. State, 121 Ga. 329 . 2. … Simmons v. Ga. Iron & Coal Co., 117 Ga. 305 (2). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    148 N.M. 611 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2010

    241 P.3d 612 (2010) 2010-NMCERT-007 STATE v. BROWN. No. 32,467. Supreme Court of New Mexico. July 29, 2010. Denials of Certiorari.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Prescott

    63 N.H. 61 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 5, 1884

    Brown, and for an injunction against the other defendants to restrain them from levying an execution upon it, in their favor, against Prescott. … Newton v. Swazey, 8 N. H. 9; Tilton v. Tilton, 9 N. H. 385; Burnham, v. Porter, 24 N. H. 580; Kidder v. Barr, 35 N. H. 352; Glass v. Hulbert, 102 Mass. 24 ; 2 Sto. Eq. Jur. 759 et seq.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    50 So. 3d 815 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 5, 2010

    In re Brown, Joseph; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 04-04-0373; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 1729.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    15 N.Y.3d 831 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Heleringer v. Brown

    104 S.W.3d 397 · Kentucky Supreme Court · May 7, 2003

    Hunter Bates shall be stricken from the written designation of the election officers filed with the Kentucky Board of Elections. This Order shall be certified to the Kentucky Board of Elections. … A similar view appears in Queen-on v. Mimms, 20 and in Baker v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Barber v. Brown

    55 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1916

    In the well-considered case of Wilson v . Greer, 50 Okla. 387 , 151 Pac. 629 , Devereux, C., held: “A will is ambulatory during the life of its maker. … In Loveren v. Kamprey, 22 N. H. 434, it was held that a new law, changing the operation of a will, is not retroactive, where the testator makes his will prior to the passage of the act, but dies thereafter.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    167 Tex. Crim. 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1959

    Campbell v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 172 , 297 S.W.2d 847 . The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Opinion approved by the Court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Beverstock v. Brown

    157 Mass. 565 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 4, 1893

    The principles laid down in Capen v. Duggan, 136 Mass. 501 , are decisive of this case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    656 S.W.2d 727 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1983

    Four days later, Brown received $372.82 from Detective Davis for the alleged repairs. … This statute was also silent on the question of the necessity of victim’s reliance on the false impression, but this court, in Rowland v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Levy

    13 A.3d 480 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2010

    13 A.3d 480 (2010) BROWN v. LEVY. No. 475 MAL (2010). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. November 30, 2010. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patane v. Brown

    792 A.2d 1086 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2002

    Patane came back outside while Brown was picking up branches from the bush, and she grabbed one of the branches that Brown was holding. … Brown’s second argument cannot succeed. [¶ 11] Brown also argues that the court erred in finding that Patane had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Brown committed criminal threatening.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wimpress

    250 Md. 200 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 31, 1968

    Ass’n v. Molloy, 232 Md. 265, 272 ; Kaslow v. Rockville, 236 Md. 159 ; Stocksdale v. Barnard, 239 Md. 541 ; Leroux v. … Seabold, 246 Md. 562 ; Woodlawn Ass’n v. Board, 241 Md. 187 ; Polinger v. Briefs, 244 Md. 538 ; Leroux v. Baltimore, 248 Md. 106 ; The Chatham Corp. v. Beltran, 243 Md. 138 ; Whittle v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Brown

    21 Kan. 171 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

    Henry Brown v. J. G. Kennedy. We bind ourselves to the above-entitled plaintiff, Henry Brown, in the sum of six thousand dollars, that the defendant, J. … (Freeman on Judg., § 180; Rapelye v. Prince, 4 Hill, 119 ; Coleman v. Bean, 3 Keyes, 94 ; Harrison v. Wilkin, 69 N. Y. 412 .) The judgment of the district court'must be affirmed. All the Justices concurring.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.