Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.47s
453 S.W.2d 171 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1970
We find the evidence sufficient, Singleton v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 71 , 253 S.W.2d 441 ; Dove v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 402 S.W.2d 913 .
Cited 3 timesPublished58 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1860
The ease is narrowed down to the claims of Clara Becknall and Uoah Brown. … In respect to Brown, we are of opinion that his right, under the mortgage is presumed to be abandoned from lapse of time.
Cited 2 timesPublished201 Ala. 465 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 1918
McDaniel v. Sullivan & Bramlett, 144 Ala. 583 , 39 South. 355 . [2] The averments of fraudulent representations contained in said plea were sufficient. Roddam v. Brown, ante, p. 109, 77 South. 403 ; § 4298, Code 1907. … In Hayes v.
Cited 7 timesPublished203 N.J. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 2010
3 A.3d 1226 (2010) 203 N.J. 437 STATE v. BROWN. Nos. C-15 September Term 2010, 065825 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 10, 2010. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished122 Ga. 571 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 24, 1905
Jordan v. State, 119 Ga. 443 ; Davis v. State, 120 Ga. 843 ; McFarlin v. State, 121 Ga. 329 . 2. … Simmons v. Ga. Iron & Coal Co., 117 Ga. 305 (2). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished148 N.M. 611 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2010
241 P.3d 612 (2010) 2010-NMCERT-007 STATE v. BROWN. No. 32,467. Supreme Court of New Mexico. July 29, 2010. Denials of Certiorari.
Cited 0 timesPublished63 N.H. 61 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 5, 1884
Brown, and for an injunction against the other defendants to restrain them from levying an execution upon it, in their favor, against Prescott. … Newton v. Swazey, 8 N. H. 9; Tilton v. Tilton, 9 N. H. 385; Burnham, v. Porter, 24 N. H. 580; Kidder v. Barr, 35 N. H. 352; Glass v. Hulbert, 102 Mass. 24 ; 2 Sto. Eq. Jur. 759 et seq.
Cited 2 timesPublished50 So. 3d 815 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 5, 2010
In re Brown, Joseph; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 04-04-0373; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 1729.
Cited 0 timesPublished104 S.W.3d 397 · Kentucky Supreme Court · May 7, 2003
Hunter Bates shall be stricken from the written designation of the election officers filed with the Kentucky Board of Elections. This Order shall be certified to the Kentucky Board of Elections. … A similar view appears in Queen-on v. Mimms, 20 and in Baker v.
Cited 5 timesPublished55 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1916
In the well-considered case of Wilson v . Greer, 50 Okla. 387 , 151 Pac. 629 , Devereux, C., held: “A will is ambulatory during the life of its maker. … In Loveren v. Kamprey, 22 N. H. 434, it was held that a new law, changing the operation of a will, is not retroactive, where the testator makes his will prior to the passage of the act, but dies thereafter.
Cited 5 timesPublished167 Tex. Crim. 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1959
Campbell v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 172 , 297 S.W.2d 847 . The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Opinion approved by the Court.
Cited 2 timesPublished157 Mass. 565 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 4, 1893
The principles laid down in Capen v. Duggan, 136 Mass. 501 , are decisive of this case.
Cited 2 timesPublished656 S.W.2d 727 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1983
Four days later, Brown received $372.82 from Detective Davis for the alleged repairs. … This statute was also silent on the question of the necessity of victim’s reliance on the false impression, but this court, in Rowland v.
Cited 5 timesPublished13 A.3d 480 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2010
13 A.3d 480 (2010) BROWN v. LEVY. No. 475 MAL (2010). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. November 30, 2010. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished792 A.2d 1086 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2002
Patane came back outside while Brown was picking up branches from the bush, and she grabbed one of the branches that Brown was holding. … Brown’s second argument cannot succeed. [¶ 11] Brown also argues that the court erred in finding that Patane had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Brown committed criminal threatening.
Cited 3 timesPublished250 Md. 200 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 31, 1968
Ass’n v. Molloy, 232 Md. 265, 272 ; Kaslow v. Rockville, 236 Md. 159 ; Stocksdale v. Barnard, 239 Md. 541 ; Leroux v. … Seabold, 246 Md. 562 ; Woodlawn Ass’n v. Board, 241 Md. 187 ; Polinger v. Briefs, 244 Md. 538 ; Leroux v. Baltimore, 248 Md. 106 ; The Chatham Corp. v. Beltran, 243 Md. 138 ; Whittle v.
Cited 7 timesPublished21 Kan. 171 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878
Henry Brown v. J. G. Kennedy. We bind ourselves to the above-entitled plaintiff, Henry Brown, in the sum of six thousand dollars, that the defendant, J. … (Freeman on Judg., § 180; Rapelye v. Prince, 4 Hill, 119 ; Coleman v. Bean, 3 Keyes, 94 ; Harrison v. Wilkin, 69 N. Y. 412 .) The judgment of the district court'must be affirmed. All the Justices concurring.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna