Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

389 Mass. 382 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 8, 1983

Commonwealth v. Welcome, 348 Mass. 68, 70-71 (1964). … Commonwealth v. Imbruglia, 377 Mass. 682, 695 (1979).

Purdy v. Brown

4 Ark. 535 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1842

Maurer v. Brown

106 N.J.L. 284 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1930

There was a judgment for damages against Brown, of which he does not complain. … J. 1151; Herlihy v. Smith, 116 Mass. 265 ; Doran v. Thomsen, 74 N. J. L. 445; S. C., 76 Id. 754; 38 C. J. 94; Flaherty v. Helfont (Me.), 122 Atl. Rep. 180 ; Groetz v. Day (N. H.), 128 Id. *286 334; Gavin v. Cohn, 5 N.

Warren v. . Brown

64 N.C. 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1870

Jewett v. Brown

319 Mass. 243 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 1, 1946

Ware v. Minot, 202 Mass. 512, 516 . Temple v. Russell, 251 Mass. 231, 235-236 . Crowell v. Chapman, 257 Mass. 492, 495 . Sewall v. Elder, 279 Mass. 473, 476-477 . State Street Trust Co. v. Crocker, 306 Mass. 257, 260 . … See Jones v. Gane, 205 Mass. 37, 44-45 . See also Lewis’s Appeal, 108 Penn. St. 133, 136-137; Eisiminger v. Eisiminger, 129 Penn. St. 564, 566; Small v. Small, 242 Penn. St. 235, 238; Gotwald v. Small, 242 Penn.

Stevens v. Brown

173 Tenn. 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 27, 1938

This on the authority of McGee v. Fourth & *236 First National Bank, 153 Tenn., 357 , 284 S. W., 60 . In that case a demurrer was filed and no action taken by complainant for sis years. … The case of McGee v. Fourth & First National Bank was explained in Doane v. Knoxville Inv. Corp., 159 Tenn., 76 , 16 S. W. (2d), 186 .

Bloch v. Brown

201 Miss. 653 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1947

The opinion therein was written by the same judge who wrote the opinion in Alabama & V. Railway Co. v. … Later cases are Natchez Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Watson, 160 Miss. 173 , 133 So. 677 ; White v. Weitz, 169 Miss. 102 , 152 So. 484 ; Bridges v. State, 197 Miss. 527 , 19 So. (2d) 738 .

Bottomley v. Brown

188 Mich. 134 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1915

The headnote to Hubbard v. … In Cashin v. Pliter, 168 Mich. 386 ( 134 N. W. 482 , Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 1913C, 697), and in Pontiac Savings Bank v. Pipe Co., 178 Mich. 261 ( 144 N.

Brown v. United States

152 A.3d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2016

Kellam v. . Brown

112 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

Plaintiffs introduced evidence tending to show that Faulkner, Kellam Moore had delivered certain goods to defendant, Isaac Brown, under the following contract: This agreement, made and entered into this 5 June, 1891, by and … Witness: ISSAC BROWN. Please send copy of this with goods.

Commonwealth v. Brown

478 Pa. 628 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1978

In this appeal Brown is represented by new counsel, that is, counsel who did not represent him at trial. … Commonwealth v. Twiggs, 406 Pa. 105 , 331 A.2d 440 (1975). The judgment of sentence is vacated, and the record is remanded for further proceedings.

Stanley v. Brown

303 Ky. 481 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Dec 6, 1946

In Garrett v. Patton, 81 W. Va. 771 , 95 S. … In Zinn v.

Brown v. Summerfield

153 Md. 356 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 10, 1927

Brown to release Mr. Brown from their respective claims and that Mr. … Wilmer v. Thomas, 74 Md. 485, 488 ; 3 Williston on Contracts, sec. 1640; Lane v. Smythe, 46 N. J. Eq. 443.

Brown v. State

149 Ga. 816 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 13, 1920

See Whitten v. State, 47 Ga. 297 ; Loeb v. Jennings, 133 Ga. 796, 801 ( 67 S. E. 101 , 18 Ann. Cas. 376); Coppage v. State, 4 Ga. App. 696 ( 62 S. … Under this view the reasoning in Cole v. State, 2 Ga. App. 734, 738 ( 59 S. E. 24 ), would not apply. The doctrines pronounced in McDonald v. Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 654, 656 ( 60 S. E. 337 ), and Johnson v. Atlanta, 6 Ga.

Brown v. Neustadt

145 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1930

Brown and Travis Deaton brought suit against Walter Neu-stadt and Roger Whitfield to determine their title to certain real and personal property, to enjoin defendants from further trespassing or going upon said property or … Stuart v. Coleman, 78 Okla. 81 , 188 Pac. 1063 ; Daniel v. Hill, 106 Okla. 272 , 235 Pac. 1090 ; Section 260, C. O. S. 1921; Smith v. Curreather’s Mercantile Co., 76 Okla. 170 , 184 Pac. 102 ; Probst v.

Young v. Brown

136 Tenn. 184 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1916

Taul v. Campbell, 7 Yerg., 319 , 27 Am. Dec., 508 . This accounts for the language used in the reconveyance to Mrs. Brown; but, inasmuch as the conveyance to Gr. W. Brown was different, the rule could not' apply. … Voorhies v. Granberry, 5 Baxt., (64 Tenn.) 704; McFerrin v. White, 6 Cold., (46 Tenn.) 500.

Heflen v. Brown

208 Iowa 325 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 5, 1929

Enix v. Iowa Cent. R. Co., 114 Iowa 508 ; Heiman v. Felder, 178 Iowa 740 ; First Nat. Bank v. Zeims, 93 Iowa 140 ; Conger v. Crabtree, 88 Iowa 536 ; Linden v. Green, 81 Iowa 365 ; Benjamin v. … Vieth, 80 Iowa 149 ; Zundelowitz v. Webster, 96 Iowa 587 ; Martin & Turner v. Widner, McKenzie & Co., 91 Iowa 459 ; Great Western Ptg. Co. v. Tucker, 73 Iowa 755 ; City of Oskaloosa v. Boyd, 185 Iowa 1051 .

Brown v. Ellis

709 S.E.2d 929 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 2011

709 S.E.2d 929 (2011) BROWN v. ELLIS. No. 389P07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 27, 2011. Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown, William Lawson (III). T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis, Mark P. K. … Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Brown, William Lawson (III).

State v. Brown

112 Ariz. 401 · Arizona Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1975

Berger v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, supra. The denial of the defendant’s motion in this case occurred before the date of our decision in State ex rel. Berger v. … J., STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and HAYS and HOLOHAN, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Avery

119 Mich. 384 · Michigan Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1899

Co. v. Bulte, 45 Mich. 113 . … See, also, MacEwen v. Beard, 58 Minn. 176 ; Allison v. Armstrong, 28 Minn. 276 ( 41 Am. Rep. 281 ); Washington, etc., Trust Co. v. McKenzie, 64 Minn. 273 ; *388 Avery v. Judd, 21 Wis. 262 ; Horton v.