Case law

State v. Brown

365 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

709 S.E.2d 925 (2011) STATE v. Alexander Robert BROWN. No. 71P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 15, 2011. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Brown, Alexander Robert. Charles E.

Brown v. Parker

2 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1894

He now offers to bring into court the costs, fees and expenses paid by Brown, and demands that Brown .be compelled to convey the legal title to him. … It attempts to divert the proceeds of sales of lots from the purposes authorized by congress, and also attempts to regulate the practice before, and appeals from, the board of townsite trustees appointed by the secretary

Lee v. Brown

99 Neb. 661 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1916

Brown, by his attorney, filed a separate answer; he having removed to Chicago. … The judgment of the district court as to defendant Makres is affirmed, and as to defendant Brown and attorney Baird is reversed and the cause dismissed. Judgment accordingly.

Brown v. United States

170 A.3d 214 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2017

Brown v. Dougherty

74 N.M. 80 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1964

Martha relies on Espinosa v. … See Davis v. Severson, 1963, 71 N.M. 480 , 379 P.2d 774 ; Burdick-Baron Co. v. Swift & Co. (5th Cir. 1950), 180 F.2d 424 ; Isaacks v. Jeffers (10th Cir.1944), 144 F.2d 26 ; Ross v.

Brown v. Hallgreen

237 Mass. 293 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 11, 1921

Jennings v. Demmon, 194 Mass. 108 . Porter v. Howes, 202 Mass. 54 . … See Thaxter v. Sprague, 159 Mass. 397 . The finding of the judge must stand and the decree for the plaintiff in the second suit is affirmed. The decree for the de-, fendant in the first suit is affirmed with costs.

Gullett v. Brown

307 Ark. 385 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1991

The other vehicle was driven by Cecily Brown. … See, e.g., Seawright v. U.S.F.&G.

Brown v. Glebe

213 Neb. 318 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1983

See, Sturm v. Mau, 209 Neb. 865 , 312 N.W.2d 272 (1981); Bartlett v. Kloepping, 195 Neb. 755 , 240 N.W.2d 592 (1976). … See, Winkle v. Mitera, 195 Neb. 821 , 241 N.W.2d 329 (1976); Harris v. Heeter, 137 Neb. 905 , 291 N.W. 721 (1940).

Pound v. Brown

258 Iowa 994 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 8, 1966

The ordinance considered in Richardson v. Brix, supra, contained no such provision. This court considered section 117.30 in Ducummon v. … Houston v. Williams, 53 Cal. App. 267, 271 , 200 P. 55, 56 . See also Davis v. Chipman, Cal. App., 282 P. 992 , 994; Wise v. Radis, 74 Cal. App. 765 , 242 P. 90 . New York reached an opposite conclusion in Bendell v.

Brown v. Martin

19 Tex. 343 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

(Mason v. Kleberg & Burleson, 4 Tex. R. 85 ; Hunt v. Wright and wife, 13 Tex. R. 549 ; 1 Starkie’s Ev. 446, (*447.) … A variance in the amount of the note or bond sued on will be fatal, (Pillie v. Moliere, 7 Mart. R. 341 ; *346 Philips’ Ev. Part 1, C. & H. notes, page 686 & 691 ; Adams v. Brown, 4 Litt. R. 7 ; Chitty on Bills, 559.)

Brown v. Morrow

124 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1916

Subsequently, Morrow told Brown that he was going to sue Halford and have a writ of garnishment issued against Brown. … Millsaps v. Nixon, 102 Ark. 435 . In the application of this rule, in Robinson & Son Contracting Co. v.

State v. Brown

712 A.2d 513 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1998

with Brown in each of the nineteen incidents alleged in Brown’s indictment. … State v. Doody, 484 A.2d 523 , 527 (Me.1981); see State v. Lakin, 536 A.2d 1124, 1126 (Me.1988); see also State v. Pierce, 474 A.2d 182, 184 (Me.1984); State v.

Brown v. Smith

5 Miss. 387 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1841

If so, then according to the interpretation which has been given to the statute by this court, in the case of Davis v. … Abbott v. Allen, 2 J. Ch. Rep. 519. 19 Martin’s Louis. Rep. 235. This was held to be the true rule in cases of the sale of lands, in several cases which have been decided by this court during the present term.

Campbell v. Brown

64 Iowa 425 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 8, 1884

Counsel cite and rely on Thompson v. Wilson, 2 N. H., 291; Stearns v. Burnham, 5 Me., 261, and Dial v. Gary, 14 S. C., 573. These cases sustain the proposition above stated. … Harper v. Butler, 2 Pet., 239 ; Wilkins v. Ellett, 108 U. S., 256 ; Rand v. Hubbard, 4 Metc., (Mass.,) 252; Petersen v. Chemical Bank, 32 N. Y., 21 ; Owen v. Moody, 29 Miss., 79 ; Story’s Conflict of Laws, § 359.

Brown v. Lencer

459 Pa. 549 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1975

Brown v. State

367 So. 2d 1008 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 8, 1979

Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. This Court having recently held Section 847.04, Florida Statutes (1975) unconstitutional on its face reverses the judgment of the county court. See Brown v.

Brown v. Cuccia

576 So. 2d 1265 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1991

576 So.2d 1265 (1991) Mattie BROWN v. Joseph CUCCIA. No. 89-CA-0701. Supreme Court of Mississippi. March 13, 1991. As Modified March 27, 1991. James H. Walker, Cleveland, for appellant. Andrew M.W. … Stiglet, Inc., 523 So.2d 55, 60 (Miss. 1988); Hollingsworth v. Bovaird Supply Co., 465 So.2d 311, 314-315 (Miss. 1985); Schoppe v. Applied Chemicals Division, Mobley Co., Inc., 418 So.2d 833, 837 (Miss. 1982).

Main v. Brown

56 Conn. 345 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Dec 16, 1887

In the month of November, 1883, Noyes made an assignment in insolvency, and one Roswell Brown became the trustee ; and afterwards, on the 18th of May, 1885, Noyes and the trustee transferred all their interest in the contract

Brown v. Boeing Co.

76 N.E.3d 142 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2017

Brown v. Rahr

149 Conn. 743 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 26, 1962

Sears v. Curtis, 147 Conn. 311, 316 , 160 A.2d 742 . The plaintiff appears to have been content with the situation until an adverse verdict was rendered. … See D’Addario v. American Automobile Ins. Co., 142 Conn. 251, 256 , 113 A.2d 361 ; Doolittle v. Upson, 138 Conn. 642, 644 , 88 A.2d 334 . There is no error.