Case law

Brown v. State

55 Ala. 123 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

Tbe eases of Donohoo v. The State, 36 Ala. 281 , and Walker v. The State, 52 Ala. 376 , are relied on in support of tbe charge in this case. … See Com. v. Strupney, 105 Mass. 588 ; Roscoe’s Cr.Ev. 347. Under tbe rules above declared, tbe Circuit Court erred in tbe explanatory charge given. Reversed and remanded.

Brown v. Fogarty

221 Ala. 283 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1930

It is not very clear; neither is count 1 in Hart v. … Adler v. Miller, supra. And, as there said: “It should set forth the conditions on which the right of the action ex contractu for personal injury rests, as stated in Hart v. Coleman, supra.”

Brown v. Bordelon

85 So. 3d 1273 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 20, 2012

85 So.3d 1273 (2012) Caletha BROWN v. Edwin A. BORDELON and Bordelon's Super Save, Inc. No. 2012-C-0547. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 20, 2012. Denied.

Howard v. Brown

11 Vt. 361 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 15, 1839

Short v. Moore, trustee, 10 Vt. R. 446. … In Atkins v.

Brown v. United States

170 A.3d 214 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2017

State v. Brown

209 N.J. 96 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 2012

35 A.3d 682 (2012) 209 N.J. 96 STATE v. BROWN. C-541 September Term 2011, 069001 Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 19, 2012. Petition for Certification Denied.

Brown v. Snider

126 Mich. 198 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1901

“Yours truly, “Brown & Sehler.” … Marcott v. Railroad Co., 47 Mich. 1 ( 10 N. W. 53 ); Harris v. Township of Clinton, 64 Mich. 447 ( 31 N. W. 425 , 8 Am. St. Rep. 842 ); Ashman v. Railroad Co., 90 Mich. 567 ( 51 N.

Brown v. . Mitchell

102 N.C. 347 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

In Hodges v. … Knott v. Taylor , 96 N.C. 553 ; Gilchrist v. Kitchin , 86 N.C. 20 ; March v. Verble , 79 N.C. 19 .

Schoenfeld v. Brown

78 Ill. 487 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

One of the Browns, and Champion, their book-keeper, testified positively that appellant told them to go on and deliver the doors, windows and frames, and he would pay for them. … Brown testified that he and his partner abandoned the contract with Preston & Koneman before they delivered any of the materials, except the $405 worth, for which they obtained from them appellant’s check; and it was, as

Brown v. Mills

350 Or. 716 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 2011

260 P.3d 493 (2011) 350 Or. 716 BROWN v. MILLS. (S059407). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 15, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

Haskell v. Brown

65 Ill. 29 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

The case of Moshier v. Knox College, 32 Ill. 155 , is to the same effect, and so is Wylder v. Crane, 53 ib. 490. … As was said by this court in Peck v.

Brown v. . Wilson

174 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1917

Goodman v. Goodman, 72 N. C., 508 ; Merrill v. Merrill, 92 N. C., 665. … C., 143 ; Smith v. McCrary, 38 N. C., 204 ; Brothers v. Cartwright, 55 N. C., 113 ; Conly v. Kincaid, 60 N. C., 594 ; Adams Eq., 136.

Doran v. Brown

16 Wash. 703 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1897

The brief is more faulty in this respect than was that in the case of Haugh v.

Brown v. State

159 Tex. Crim. 95 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1953

In the case of Bickerstaff v. State, 139 Tex. Cr. R. 69 , 139 S.W. (2d) 110 , this court said: “We think that the facts of this case are somewhat like the facts in the case of Puga v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. … See, also, Berry v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 114 , 282 S.W. 594 .

State v. Brown

171 Wash. 2d 1025 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2011

257 P.3d 664 (2011) 171 Wash.2d 1021 STATE v. BROWN. No. 85651-6. Supreme Court of Washington, Department II. June 8, 2011. Disposition of Petition for Review Denied.

Brown v. People

162 Colo. 406 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 24, 1967

Brown and Glymph v. People, 158 Colo. 561 , 408 P.2d 981 . … Buckles v. People, 162 Colo. 51 , 424 P.2d 774 . The trial court properly denied the motion for relief under Rule 35 (b). The judgment accordingly is affirmed.

Brown v. Keaton

232 Ark. 12 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1960

Delamar v. Ward, 184 Ark. 82 , 41 S. W. 2d 760 ; Pollock Stores Co. v. Chatwell, 192 Ark. 83 , 90 8. W. 2d 213. … Co. v. Walker, 67 Ark. 147 , 53 S. W. 675 ; El Dorado & Bastrop R. Co. v. Whatley, 88 Ark. 20 , 114 S. W. 234 , 129 A. S. R. 93.

Com. v. Brown

30 A.3d 486 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2011

30 A.3d 486 (2011) COM. v. BROWN. No. 493 MAL (2011). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. September 28, 2011. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.

Brown v. Moss

53 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1909

has not been executed in the form required by law to entitle, it to record, it may be that its proof cannot be made by a certified copy, and that the spreading of it upon the record of the county is a nullity: Musgrove v.

Brown v. Hassig

136 Kan. 384 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 5, 1932

(Meffert v. Medical Board, 66 Kan. 710 , 72 Pac. 247 .) Did the facts found by the medical board constitute gross immorality? … (Meffert v. Medical Board, supra; Drainage District v. Rail *388 way Co., 99 Kan. 188, 210, 211 , 161 Pac. 937 .) The attorney-general is the legal adviser of the medical board.