Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.03s
34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854
. *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.
Cited 0 timesPublished117 R.I. 936 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Nov 10, 1976
Brown that she be allowed to file her memorandum in opposition to petition for certiorari at the same time as she files her brief in the appeal of Brown v. Brown, 76-307-A, is granted.
Cited 0 timesPublished79 Tenn. 698 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1883
Brown, the ward, as a set-off against the expense of his maintenance, pointing out the proof showing the service to have been worthless. … V. Deaderick, Esq., discussing clearly this point, and holding said service to be shown by the proof worthless.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836
The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Ohio Law. Abs. 845 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1923
Brown and J. Brown, brothers, entered into a farming and stock raising partnership whereby W.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Ohio St. (N.S.) 467 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1856
This case presents, substantially, the same questions as the case of Davenport v. The Widow and Heirs of Sovil, decided at this term, and is in effect decided by it.
Cited 0 timesPublished75 S.C. 25 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 24, 1906
Brown is entitled to. ......$ 280 40 W. F. Brown is entitled to. ......... 280 40 James H. Brown is entitled to>..... 280 40 Louisa A. Brown to................. 140 20 Margaret A. … This exception is overruled. 4 V. “Because said order is contrary to' the terras of the will of John A. Brown, deceased, and the decree of Judge Norton and Judge Townsend.”
Cited 0 timesPublished116 N.J. Eq. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1934
Black v. Black, 26 N. J. Eq. 431; affirmed, 27 N. J. Eq. 664; Marsh v. Marsh, 16 N. J. Eq. 391; Goodwin v. Goodwin, 23 N. J. Eq. 210. The order under review will be affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna