Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

7.51s

  • Clark v. Brown

    15 Vt. 658 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1843

    Indeed the case of Smith v. Wood, 3 Vt. 485 , appears to be decisive of the question. For neither of the reasons, should the county court have rejected the deposition. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wright

    5 Ga. 29 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 15, 1848

    to the Court of Ordinary, by the administrator, apparently just and correct, had no foundation in fact, and was fraudulently raised by the administrator, after the intestate’s death; that in her lifetime, he promised to board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    73 Wis. 2d 703 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1976

    In Clark v. State (1974), 62 Wis. 2d 194 , 214 N. … Clark v. State, supra, at p. 202; Schleiss v. State (1976), 71 Wis. 2d 733, 738 , 239 N. W. 2d 68 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    90 So. 3d 1059 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 15, 2012

    In re Brown, Brandi; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 10190; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2068. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Board of Supervisors

    22 Wis. 167 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

    plaintiff purchased the certificates from the county, he was the owner of some of the lots of a corresponding description in Arndt’s second addition; and that subsequently, and before the presentation of his account to the board … But as it is, the judgment must he wholly *172 reversed; and in reversing it, we think, contrary to the usual practice in cases tried before the court without a jury (see Garbutt v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fulkerson

    125 Mo. 400 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1894

    His will is the same that was construed in Brown v. Rogers, ante, p. 392. For its provisions see that opinion. … Godman v. Simmons, 113 Mo. 127 , and cases cited.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Madison County Bd. of Education

    1 So. 3d 980 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 27, 2008

    In Ray v. … Florida Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 133 F.3d 797 , 802 (11th Cir.1998) (quoting Brown v. Crawford, 906 F.2d 667, 671 (11th Cir.1990) (citations omitted and emphasis added)). Accord George v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    85 So. 3d 1268 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 20, 2012

    In re Brown III, Joe; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 5195; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-86. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rudulph v. Brown

    161 Ga. 319 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 16, 1925

    Dupon v. McLaren, 63 Ga. 470 ; Terry v. Brown, 142 Ga. 224; 230 (82 S. E 566); Price v. Brown, *327 143 Ga. 671 ( 85 S. E. 870 ); Overby v. Phelps, 150 Ga. 293 ( 103 S. E. 431 ). … . -.Brown.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nicholson v. Brown

    238 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1913

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    119 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Smith

    121 Minn. 165 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Apr 18, 1913

    O’Brien v. American Bridge Co. 110 Minn. 364, 367 , 125 N. W. 1012 , 32 L.R.A.(N.S.) 980, 136 Am. St. 503. The present case is within this rule, and the question of negligence should have been submitted to the jury. 2.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gribbel v. Brown

    202 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1902

    Brown, post, p. 16. That case is now here for review and from it we learn the contents of the agreement. … While this case was tried with Harris v. Brown, the learned judge should have considered each separately on the evidence produced in the respective cases. Had he eliminated the testimony in Harris v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Johnson

    17 Ala. 232 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1850

    .— Margetts v. Barringer, 7 Simons, 482. In Newman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Batiste v. Brown

    85 So. 3d 1249 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 13, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    720 S.E.2d 12 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 9, 2012

    720 S.E.2d 12 (2012) STATE v. Brandon Jason BROWN. No. 7P12-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 9, 2012. William B. Gibson, Winston-Salem, for Brown Brandon Jason. *13 Jess D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Brown

    39 Me. 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

    In Balding v. … In Hunt v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    85 So. 3d 695 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 9, 2012

    In re Brown, Jason Lee; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 08-FELY-530571; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KA 0365.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Terry

    375 So. 2d 457 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 28, 1979

    United Security Life Insurance Co. v. Birmingham Trust Nat. Bank , 282 Ala. 295 , 211 So.2d 139 (1968); Maner v. Maner, Jr. , 279 Ala. 652 , 189 So.2d 336 (1966); Bromberg v. First Nat. … Rowe v. Johnson , 214 Ala. 510 , 108 So. 604 (1926); Clark v. Whitfield , 213 Ala. 441 , 105 So. 200 (1925). Privity would be lacking here.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Horton v. Brown

    130 Ind. 113 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1891

    Cleveland v. Obenchain, supra; Pitcher v. Dove, 99 Ind. 175 ; Hills v. Ludwig, 46 Ohio St. 373 ; Bobo v. Richmond, 25 Ohio St. 115 ; Walker v. Devlin, 2 Ohio St. 593 ; Gwynn v. Schwartz (W. Va.), 9 S. E. … Rep. 880 ; Silvarer v. Hansen, 77 Cal. 579 ; Atchison v. Pease, 96 Mo. 566 ; Schad v. Sharp, 95 Mo. 573 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.