Case law

Brown v. Brown

32 S.D. 216 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1913

Brown v. Brown

12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899

defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons

Brown v. Brown

163 Mich. 341 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1910

Brown, deceased, and the representatives of his minor children, and also William J. … The banker who drew the deed and contract at the request of the deceased son, Levi Brown, his father, and Mr.

Brown v. Brown

175 Mich. 442 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1913

The bill of complaint is filed by the widow and administratrix of the estate of Walter Brown, deceased, against Albert and Frank Brown. … Levi Brown had been a partner in the company, but had sold his interest, and on April 23, 1907, defendant Albert Brown had a one-fifth interest in the business, and Walter Brown, Harvey Brown, and Frank Brown owned in equal

Brown v. Brown

2 R.I. 381 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Sep 6, 1852

Brown v. Brown

70 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1895

Brown v. Brown

300 N.Y. 714 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1950

Brown v. Brown

485 So. 2d 287 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1986

Brown v. Brown

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 44 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 7, 1845

Brown v. . Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1851

Although commenced before, it was tried and decided in the supreme court after the enactment of the code, and to such a case this court has decided that the code applies. ( Grover v. Coon, 1 Comst . 536.)

Brown v. Brown

43 N.H. 17 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 15, 1861

Yeaton v. Roberts, 28 N. H. 468; 4 Com. Dig., Estate by Devise, K; White v. Warner, 3 Doug. 4 . … Cuthbert v. Lempriere, 3 M. & S. 158.

Brown v. Brown

15 N.J. Eq. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1862

The decree of the Chancellor was reversed by the following vote: For reversa l—Judges Brown, Combs, Elmer, Haines, Kennedy, Ogden, Van Dyke, Vredenburgh, Whelpley, Wood—10. For affirmomce —N one.

Brown v. Brown

22 Neb. 703 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

The defendant Brown has filed a very lengthy answer, which need not be noticed here. On the trial of the cause the court found “that the plaintiff, Eliza H. … pay the said sum of money in its possession, one-half of the same to-said plaintiff and one-half to said defendant Brown, as-aforesaid, and that the said plaintiff and the said defendant-Brown should pay the costs of suit

Brown v. Brown

620 So. 2d 881 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1993

In re Brown, Royce M.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 93-CA-0046; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 34,457.

Brown v. Brown

544 So. 2d 141 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

Brown v. Brown

317 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

Brown v. Brown

299 Ky. 388 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Feb 13, 1945

Brown was 47 years of age and had one child 14 or 15 years old. Brown was 66 years of age and had reared several children, all of whom were grown and married in 1934. … Brown’s name. A small house was built on this lot, partly from lumber brought by Brown from his Letcher County farm. Mrs. Brown said she paid for the hauling of the lumber and also $10 on a lumber bill.

Brown v. Brown

210 Mich. 595 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1920

Brown, and each heir or assignee was made a party thereto. Neither the administrator nor the estate was made a party. … While these orders are discretionary with the court and are not reviewable, except for abuse of discretion (Smith v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 82 Mich. 93 ; Sanborn v. St.

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

Brown v. Brown

308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983