Case law

Simpson v. Brown

107 Wash. 366 · Washington Supreme Court · May 31, 1919

Failure to observe such care precludes any right of recovery. 3 Labatt, Master and Servant (2d ed.), page 3026, §1144; Jennings v. Tacoma R. & Motor Co., 7 Wash. 275, 34 Pac. 937 ; Krickeberg v. St. … Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co., 37 Wash. 63 , 79 Pac. 492 ; Jock v. Columbia & Puget Sound R. Co., 53 Wash. 437 , 102 Pac. 405 .

State v. Brown

85 So. 3d 1268 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 20, 2012

In re Brown III, Joe; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 5195; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-86. Denied.

Williams v. Brown

70 W. Va. 472 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1912

Brown. It had not in fact been paid. J. H. Watson and Lucy Watson and B. H. … The case is therefore ruled by Depue v. Miller, 65 W. Va. 120 .

Cass v. Brown

68 N.H. 85 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 5, 1894

Pl. *582; Hoitt v. Holcomb, 23 N. H. 535; Webb v. Steele, 13 N. H. 230; Ladd v. Rice, 57 N. H. 374; Bell v. Lamprey, 52 N. H. 41, 47. … In Fuller v.

Mudra v. Brown

219 Iowa 867 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 2, 1935

Co. v. Brennan, 218 Iowa 666 , 252 N. W. 497 ; Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank v. Nordholm, 217 Iowa 1319 , 253 N. W. 701 ; Craig v. Waggoner, 218 Iowa 876 , 256 N. W. 285 ; Tusha v. Eberhart, 218 Iowa 1065 , 256 N.

Nicholson v. Brown

238 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1913

Brown v. Jerrild

29 Ariz. 121 · Arizona Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1925

Brown, hereinafter called plaintiff, employed I. Jerrild, hereinafter called defendant, as a clerk and meat cutter, to work in the former’s store at Scottsdale at a wage of $20 per week. … Co. v. Ballinger (Tex. Civ. App.), 40 S. W. 822 ; Mock v. Hatcher (Tex. Civ. App.), 43 S. W. 30 .

Black v. Brown

129 Ark. 270 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1917

In Ready v. Kearsley, 14 Mich. 215 , Mr. … Gannon v. Moore, supra, and eases cited.

Reedy v. Brown

395 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1959

State v. Brown

210 N.J. 217 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 2012

42 A.3d 889 (2012) 210 N.J. 217 STATE v. BROWN. C-889 September Term 2011, 069652 Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 3, 2012. Petition for Certification Denied.

State v. Hawkins

Washington Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2022

State v. … State v.

Brown v. State

48 Del. 427 · Supreme Court of Delaware · May 26, 1954

Jur., Evidence, § 478; State v. Donato, 106 N. J. L. 397, 148 A. 776 ; Brown v. State, 83 Ga. App. 650 , 64 S. E. 2d 313 ; Delnegro v. State, 198 Md. 80 , 81 A. 2d 241 ; People v. Rogers, 413 Ill. 554 , 110 N. … Daniel v. State, 187 Ga. 411 , 1 S. E. 2d 6 ; Jones v. State, 130 Ga. 274 , 60 S. E. 840 ; Moore v. State, 220 Wis. 404 , 265 N. W. 101 ; McCloud v. State, 166 Ga. 436 , 143 S. E. 558 ; State v.

Brummitt v. Brown

159 Tenn. 612 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1929

Brown to Mildred Brown Cameron is here filed as Exhibit ‘ A. ’ The grantee is a sister of the said Prank C. Brown. … In Dougherty v.

Brown v. Smith

121 Minn. 165 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Apr 18, 1913

O’Brien v. American Bridge Co. 110 Minn. 364, 367 , 125 N. W. 1012 , 32 L.R.A.(N.S.) 980, 136 Am. St. 503. The present case is within this rule, and the question of negligence should have been submitted to the jury. 2.

Batiste v. Brown

85 So. 3d 1249 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 13, 2012

State v. Brown

720 S.E.2d 12 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 9, 2012

720 S.E.2d 12 (2012) STATE v. Brandon Jason BROWN. No. 7P12-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 9, 2012. William B. Gibson, Winston-Salem, for Brown Brandon Jason. *13 Jess D.

Konrad v. Brown

19 N.Y.3d 804 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 2012

19 N.Y.3d 804 (2012) 969 N.E.2d 786 946 N.Y.S.2d 567 2012 NY Slip Op 74685 KONRAD v. BROWN. Motion No: 2012-285. Court of Appeals of New York. Decided May 31, 2012. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Brown v. State

96 Miss. 534 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1910

Gribbel v. Brown

202 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1902

Brown, post, p. 16. That case is now here for review and from it we learn the contents of the agreement. … While this case was tried with Harris v. Brown, the learned judge should have considered each separately on the evidence produced in the respective cases. Had he eliminated the testimony in Harris v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

310 Ky. 306 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · May 17, 1949

Appellant’s chief complaint is that the trial court permitted witnesses for the Commonwealth to state as their opinion that the masked gunman was Orville Brown. In Foure v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 62 , 265 S. … witness knew who it was she saw, or some facts or circumstances upon which she could base a judgment as to who it was, she should be permitted to testify as to who the man was or who in her judgment it was # * *313 In Hogan v.