Case law

Haescig v. Brown

34 Mich. 503 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1876

State v. Brown

274 S.C. 592 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 5, 1980

Ness, Justice: Appellant Marion Eugene Brown was convicted of driving under the influence, third offense. We affirm. … . *595 While the legislature may not enact a law vesting an administrative body with broad and uncontrolled discretion in its execution, “in enacting a law complete in itself it may authorize an administrative agency or board

Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield

120 N.H. 764 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 3, 1980

This rule of strict construction has been applied across the board for all types of insurance contracts. Id. at § 15:74. … Brown v. City of Laconia, 118 N.H. 376, 379 , 386 A.2d 1276, 1278 (1978).

Brown v. State

413 S.W.2d 922 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 19, 1967

Allen v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 569 , 204 S.W.2d 615 , cited by appellant, does not support his contention. We perceive no error. … Robertson v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 35 , 322 S.W.2d 620 ; Matula v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 390 S.W.2d 263 .

Brown v. Gurney

20 Minn. 527 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Apr 15, 1874

Barons v. Brown

25 Kan. 410 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1881

(Meagher v. Morgan, 3 Kas. 372 ; Barkley v. State, 15 Kas. 99 .) *412 The second error assigned in the record is based .upon the admission of certain testimony of one of the plaintiffs. … (Stone v. Bird, 16 Kas. 488 ; City of Wyandotte v. Gibson, ante, p. 236.)

Brown v. State

203 Ark. 109 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 1941

Brown v. State, 198 Ark. 920 , 132 S. W. 2d 15 . After this case had been remanded to the lower court for a new trial, another trial was had therein on October 22, 1940, which resulted in a mistrial. … Roberts v. State, 96 Ark. 58 , 131 S. W. 60 ; McGough v. State, 113 Ark. 301 , 167 S. W. 857 ; Arnold v. State, 179 Ark. 1066 , 20 S. W. 2d 189 ; Spear v. State, 184 Ark. 1047 , 44 S. W. 2d 663 .”

Reedy v. Brown

395 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1959

Richmond v. Brown

812 So. 2d 624 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 2002

In re Brown, Douglas C., M.D.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Re *625 medial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. … The court should also address the case of Solomon v. Medical Ctr., 97-0783 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/14/97) , 694 So.2d 1229 , in its opinion. KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

Brown v. Stephens

165 Tenn. 85 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1932

Beginning with Griffith v. Beasly, 10 Yer., 134 , and followed in Cherry v. Hardin, 4 Heist., 190; Driver v. Arn & Card, 6 Hig., 589; Whaley v. Catlett, 103 Tenn., 347 ; Wilson v. … In concluding the opinion in this case of Rook v. Perkins, referring to the leading case of Cherry v. Hardin, supra, Mr.

Brown v. State

91 Wis. 245 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1895

Proc. (4th ed.), §§ 325, 508, 554; State v. Divoll, 44 N. H. 140. This information does not allege that the accused was sworn at all, or that he testified at all. … Ind. 217-279; State v. Divoll, 44 N. H. 140. It is neither a direct nor a positive allegation that he was sworn.

Brown v. Zaubawky

388 Ill. 351 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1944

Brown, obtained a judgment by default in the sum of $5400 in the circuit court of Cook county against Joseph Zaubawky and Marciona Zaubawky. The sheriff’s return showed process of summons served August 18, 1941. … We have held as recently as Fredrich v.

Brown v. State

263 Ga. 89 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 12, 1993

Brown also contends that the court erred in failing to give an instruction limiting the jury’s consideration of the possession count. In Head v. … Head v. State, 262 Ga. 795 ( 426 SE2d 547 ) (1993). 3.

State v. Brown

107 So. 3d 637 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 25, 2013

Brown v. Floyd

163 Ala. 317 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1909

Brown et al. after the death of the intestate of the said Brown. As for such trespass, the personal representative is liable individually, but not in his representative capacity. … Brown as administrator should have been sustained to the complaint. It stated no cause of action against him in that capacity. The complaint should have been amended in this respect. — Shorter v.

Brown v. Newton

59 N.M. 274 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1955

Price v. Van Lint, 46 N.M. 58 , 120 P.2d 611 . … In Warren v.

Brown v. State

139 Tex. Crim. 332 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1940

In Lewellen v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep. 640 , 114 S. W. 1179 ; Harris v. State, 58 Texas Crim. 523, 126 S. W. 890 ; Canterberry v. State, 44 S. W. 522 ; Hunter v. State, 166 S. W. 164 ; Evage v. State, 125 S. … Lewellen v. State, supra. We think the indictment presents a proper pleading. We find no error presented in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Markve

216 Mont. 145 · Montana Supreme Court · May 23, 1985

The standard to be applied upon the granting of a new trial and the consequent reversal of a jury verdict is stated in Nelson v. … Beebe v. Johnson (1974), 165 Mont. 96 , 526 P.2d 128 , citing Campeau v. Lewis (1965), 144 Mont. 543 , 398 P.2d 960 .”

State v. Brown

8 Blackf. 69 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1846

State v. Price, 12 Gill & Johns. 260. We think that is done in this case. … The laws of our state, prima facie, furnish supervisors with the means necessary to keep the roads in, at least, a conveniently passable condition; Tate v.

Stoner v. Brown

18 Ind. 464 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1862

Brown.” “Henry C. Justice.” Stoner answered by a general traverse. … Lickbarrow v. Mason, 6 East. 22. The principles thus stated obviously apply to the case at bar, and are decisive in favor of an affirmance of the judgment. John B. Niles, for the appellants. Per Curiam.