Case law

McCormick v. Brown

201 Tenn. 166 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1956

Then on page 203, under the head of Application of the G-eneral Rule to-Actions of Trespass quare clausum fregit the case of Brown v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co., 1912, 3 Tenn. Civ. App. 397. … Swepston, 127 Tenn. 693 , 155 S.W. 928 , which definition was taken from the case of Livingston v.

State v. Brown

562 So. 2d 868 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 15, 1990

State v. Brown, 549 So.2d 323 (La. App. 1st Cir.1989). … People v. Madson, supra ; State v. Garcia, 102 Idaho 378 , 630 P.2d 665 (1981); United States v. Brown, supra . Cf. State v. Martin, supra [defendant claimed self-defense]; State v.

Brown v. Gulliford

181 Iowa 897 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 26, 1917

See Lacey v. Treasurer of State, 152 Iowa 477, 483 ; Herriott v. Potter, 115 Iowa 648 ; Mason v. Sargent, 104 U. S. 689 . … To be sure, Saunders v.

Brown v. Barber

59 Ind. 533 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1877

Brown, “ Henry Brown.” Judgment for the plaintiff. The only question made in the cause is, whether the stipulation in the note in regard to attorney’s fees was valid, and, therefore, whether such fees were collectible. … Such unconditional stipulation was held valid in the case of Churchman v. Martin, 54 Ind. 380 .

State v. Brown

213 Ind. 118 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1937

Brown. The complaint of Ruben C. Brown v. Cora M. … The following is from the opinion in Baker v. Baker 1 : _ “Insanity is no reason for dissolving the marriage.

Brown v. Wright

216 Va. 10 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 13, 1975

Richardson v. Hackett, 204 Va. 847, 850 , 134 S.E.2d 312, 315 (1964). It was for the jury to determine whether she acted with reasonable care under the circumstances. Sink v. … Dugroo v. Garrett, 203 Va. 918, 920 , 128 S.E.2d 303, 305 (1962); Reid v. Boward, 181 Va. 718, 723 , 26 S.E.2d 27, 29 (1942). That question also is typically one for jury decision. See Hoffman v.

Haescig v. Brown

34 Mich. 503 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1876

State v. Brown

274 S.C. 592 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 5, 1980

Ness, Justice: Appellant Marion Eugene Brown was convicted of driving under the influence, third offense. We affirm. … . *595 While the legislature may not enact a law vesting an administrative body with broad and uncontrolled discretion in its execution, “in enacting a law complete in itself it may authorize an administrative agency or board

Brown v. Foster

41 S.C. 118 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 20, 1894

The language of the court in Sexton v. … Sexton v. Hollis, supra; Mima Queen v. Hepburn, 7 Cranch, 290 ; Ellicott v. Pearl, 10 Pet., 412 ; Hopt v. Utah, 110 U. S., 574 .

Brown v. Watson

41 Ark. 309 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1883

Luce v. Brown

96 Vt. 140 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Oct 6, 1922

L. 2072; Kimball v. Baxter, 27 Vt. 628 ; Fuller v. Adams, 44 Vt. 543 ; Darby v. National Bank, 57 Vt. 370 ; Goff v. Brainard, 58 Vt. 468 , 5 Atl. 393 . … The defendant “gave” the plaintiff one dollar and sent his son for the brown horse and the balance of the boot money.

Barons v. Brown

25 Kan. 410 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1881

(Meagher v. Morgan, 3 Kas. 372 ; Barkley v. State, 15 Kas. 99 .) *412 The second error assigned in the record is based .upon the admission of certain testimony of one of the plaintiffs. … (Stone v. Bird, 16 Kas. 488 ; City of Wyandotte v. Gibson, ante, p. 236.)

State v. Brown

99 So. 3d 35 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 12, 2012

In re Brown, Jermaine C; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 803778; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KA1425.

Reedy v. Brown

395 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1959

Brown v. Bolt

116 Mich. 52 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1898

Stults v. Brown

112 Ind. 370 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1887

Lowrey v. Byers, 80 Ind. 443 ; Stout v. Duncan, 87 Ind. 383 ; Dunning v. Seward, 90 Ind. 63 ; Short v. Sears, 93 Ind. 505 ; Curtis v. Gooding, 99 Ind. 45 . … Mescall v. Tully, 91 Ind. 96 , and cases cited; Green v. Groves, 109 Ind. 519 , and cases cited; First Nat’l Bank v. Root, 107 Ind. 224 .

Joiner v. Brown

67 O.B.A.J. 2925 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1996

Brown (Brown or chiropractor), alleging substandard treatment of Carlos Joiner, her husband. The Joiners lived in Oklahoma and Brown practiced in Texas. … Brown seeks the appeal’s dismissal as untimely.

Brown v. State

105 Ala. 117 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

—Ex parte Pruitt & Harper, 99 Ala. 227 ; Ex parte Crawlin, 92 Ala. 101 ; Foster v. The State, 88 Ala. 182; Nicholson v. The State, 72 Ala. 178 .

Brown v. Bell

46 Colo. 163 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 15, 1909

—Hexter v. Clifford, 5 Colo. 168 ; Hunt v. Hoyt, 10 Colo. 278 ; Adams v. Tucker, 6 Col. App. 393, 396. … McGrew v.

Brown v. State

91 Wis. 245 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1895

Proc. (4th ed.), §§ 325, 508, 554; State v. Divoll, 44 N. H. 140. This information does not allege that the accused was sworn at all, or that he testified at all. … Ind. 217-279; State v. Divoll, 44 N. H. 140. It is neither a direct nor a positive allegation that he was sworn.