Case law

Brown v. . Doherty

185 N.Y. 383 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1906

(Brown v. Crabb, 156 N. Y. 447 .) The general rule, undoubtedly, is that trustees must unite in a disposal of the trust estate and a deed of land from less than all the living trustees is invalid. (Brennan v. … (See Brown v. Crabb, supra.)

State v. Brown

110 So. 3d 132 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 25, 2013

In re Brown, David; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013-KW-0326.

Brown v. Williams

24 Okla. 308 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

The following cases support.this doctrine: United States v. McCoy et al. (D. C.) 54 Fed. 107 ; Sleeper & Co. v. World’s Fair Banquet Hall Co. et al., 166 Ill. 57 , 46 N. E. 782 ; Owen v. … Bankhead, 82 Ala. 399 , 3 South. 97 ; Citizen’s Bank v. Frazee, 8 Kan. App. 638 , 56 Pac. 506 ; Malsby v. Lanark Co., 55 W. Va. 484 , 47 S. E. 358 ; Jamison, Adm’r, v. Culligan et al., 151 Mo. 410 , 52 S.

Neal v. Brown

383 S.C. 619 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 24, 2009

David Neal v. Don H. Brown and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean *623 and Coastal Resource Management, 374 S.C. 641 , 649 S.E.2d 164 (Ct.App.2007). … Brown v. South Carolina Dep’t of Health & Env. Control, 348 S.C. 507, 520 , 560 S.E.2d 410, 417 (2002).

Brown v. Wright

216 Va. 10 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 13, 1975

Richardson v. Hackett, 204 Va. 847, 850 , 134 S.E.2d 312, 315 (1964). It was for the jury to determine whether she acted with reasonable care under the circumstances. Sink v. … Dugroo v. Garrett, 203 Va. 918, 920 , 128 S.E.2d 303, 305 (1962); Reid v. Boward, 181 Va. 718, 723 , 26 S.E.2d 27, 29 (1942). That question also is typically one for jury decision. See Hoffman v.

Whiteman v. Brown

128 Vt. 384 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 3, 1970

Selectmen of Berkshire, 121 Vt. 359, 361 , 159 A.2d 78 ; Carousel Grill v. Liquor Control Board, 123 Vt. 93, 94 , 182 A.2d 336 . … Baldwin v. Morse, 126 Vt. 442, 443 , 234 A.2d 434 .

Larry v. Brown

153 Ala. 452 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 14, 1907

—Johnson v. Thomas, 77 Ala. 367; Heard v. Pulaski, 80 Ala. 502 , 2 South. 343 ; McCurdy v. Middleton, 82 Ala. 131, 137 , 2 South. 721 ; Kent & Barnett v. Marks & Gayle, 101 Ala. 350, 353 , 14 South. 472 . … . — Strickland v. Har die, 82 Ala. 412, 414 , 3 South. 40 ; Boyd & Co. v. Jones & Poye, 96 Ala. 305, 308 , 11 South. 405 , 38 Am. St. Rep. 100 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250, 252 , 15 Soutt. 568; Darden v.

State v. Brown

274 S.C. 592 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 5, 1980

Ness, Justice: Appellant Marion Eugene Brown was convicted of driving under the influence, third offense. We affirm. … . *595 While the legislature may not enact a law vesting an administrative body with broad and uncontrolled discretion in its execution, “in enacting a law complete in itself it may authorize an administrative agency or board

State v. Brown

189 Neb. 297 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1972

The evidence offered and received is that set forth in detail in State v. Alvarez, No. 38444, ante p. 281, 202 N. W. 2d 604 . … This issue is determined by what was said in State v. Alvarez, No. 38444, supra, which has been filed this same day. Affirmed.

Warchalowski v. Brown

417 A.2d 425 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1980

3001 authorizes the unconstitutional taking of private property for a nonpublic use was expressly rejected by the Law Court in Browne v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Branson

139 Okla. 271 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1928

This is an appeal from a judgment of the State Election Board dismissing the contest of W. H. Brown, wherein he seeks to prevent the State Election Board from issuing certificate of party nomination to Fred P. … Brown, designated herein as petitioner, and contestee, Fred P.

Brown v. Golightly

106 S.C. 519 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 19, 1917

all of the evidence in the case and a careful examination of the same and all the circumstances in the case there is no evidence to sustain the finding of the Circuit Court; under the decisions of this Court in McAulay v. … McAulay , 96 S.C. 86 , 79 S.E. 785 ; Dicks v. Cassels , 100 S.C. 348 , 84 S.E. 878 , and Kerr v.

People v. Brown

19 N.Y.3d 982 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2012

Geer v. . Brown

126 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1900

Stanly v. Baird, 118 N. C., 75 . … And so in Saunders v. Earp, 118 N.

Brown v. Milliman

119 Mich. 606 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1899

See Bruckner's Lessee v. Lawrence, 1 Doug. 29 , and cases there cited; Morrow v. Whitney, 95 U. S. 551 ; Forsyth v. Smale, 7 Biss. 201 . In Cragin v. Powell, 128 U. … See Flynn v. Glenny, 51 Mich. 580 ; Beaubien v. Kellogg, 69 Mich. 333 ; Carpenter v. Monks, 81 Mich. 103 .

Wyckoff v. Brown

135 Kan. 467 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jun 4, 1932

There are certain approved methods of shortening a record for appellate review (Seigle v. Soldiers’ Compensation Board, 119 Kan. 253, 254 , 237 Pac. 657 , and citations; Richards v. … (Holderman v. Hood, 78 Kan. 46 , syl. ¶ 1, 96 Pac. 71 ; Buckwalter v. Henrion, 111 Kan. 781 , 208 Pac. 645 ; Lambert v. Rhea, 134 Kan. 10 , 4 P. 2d 419 .)

Brown v. Foster

617 Pa. 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2012

Barons v. Brown

25 Kan. 410 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1881

(Meagher v. Morgan, 3 Kas. 372 ; Barkley v. State, 15 Kas. 99 .) *412 The second error assigned in the record is based .upon the admission of certain testimony of one of the plaintiffs. … (Stone v. Bird, 16 Kas. 488 ; City of Wyandotte v. Gibson, ante, p. 236.)

Halley v. Brown

92 N.H. 1 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jan 6, 1942

Lavigne v. Lavigne, 80 N. H. 559. The exception to the denial of the motion presents no question of law. State v. Danforth, 73 N. H. 215, 221. … Brown said that they had seen Miss Halley. Not only on direct, on cross-examination.” The defendant excepted “to. that statement,” and the Presiding Justice remarked: “I still don’t remember any such statement.

Brown v. Schneider

81 Kan. 486 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 8, 1910

(Palmer v. Waddell, 22 Kan. 352; Railway Co. v. Scott, 71 Kan. 874 .) … In Rait v.