Case law

Brown v. Brown

63 N.J. Eq. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1901

In Berckmans v. Berckmans, 1 C. E. … Berckmans v. Berckmans, 2 C. E. Gr. 453.

Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care Center

983 P.2d 1270 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1999

Davis v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Brown

260 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1970

Brown’s children. … Brown filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that his wife, having accepted the alimony payments, is estop-ped from appealing. Stein v. Stein, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 170 F.2d 162 (1948); Harris v.

Brown v. Brown

90 Miss. 410 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1907

The case was precisely within the principles announced in the case of Berry v. Bullock, 81 Miss., 463 , 33 South., 410 , and the authorities therein cited.

Brown v. Brown

99 W. Va. 615 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1925

In Bridgman v. Bridgman, 30 W. … Lessee of Lore v. Truman, 10 O. S. 45, 55; Moss v. Ashbrooke, 12 Ark. (7 Eng.) 369; Detrick v. Sharrar, 95 Pa. St. 521, 525; 2 Van Fleet Former Adjudication, Sec. 305; Poole v. Dilworth, 26 W. Va. 583 ; Biern v.

Belt v. Rutledge

175 W. Va. 28 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1985

The circuit court’s authority to review a decision of the Board of Review was stated in Syllabus point 1 of Kisamore v. … See also Copen v. Hix, 130 W.Va. 343 , 43 S.E.2d 382 (1947). This standard is not applicable to the Board of Review.

Brown v. Brown

49 Mass. 573 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1844

One of the strongest of these, perhaps, among the recent cases, is the case of Smith v.

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

684 So. 2d 939 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 6, 1996

In re Brown, Philip B.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 16,417; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28441-CA.

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

68 Ohio St. 3d 1441 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1994

Brown v. Brown

96 Nev. 713 · Nevada Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1980

On July 18, 1958, Ronald Brown, defendant-appellant, and Leona Brown, plaintiff-respondent, were divorced in the State of Idaho. … See Brown v. Brown, 165 P.2d 886 (Idaho 1946). See also Burke v. Burke, 255 P.2d 740 (Colo. 1953). We do not so read the cases cited.

Brown v. Brown

635 So. 2d 893 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1994

Brady v. Reiner

157 W. Va. 10 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1973

In Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), the Court applied the Establishment Clause to a state and held it to mean “. . . at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. … Law Rev. 632; Jones v. Commonwealth, 185 Va. 335 , 38 S.E.2d 444 .” Accord, Hughes v. Board of Education, 154 W.Va. 107 , 174 S.E.2d 711 (1970). As recognized by Mr. Justice Berry in *50 the recent decision of State v.

Collins v. State

897 A.2d 159 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 17, 2006

In Brown v. … Brown, 249 A.2d at 270-71 . 14 . See also, Combs v.

Brown v. Brown

341 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1995

Brown v. Brown

1 D. Chip. 360 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 15, 1815

V iewed in this light, it is unnecessary to resort to precedents to support the claim of the appellants; common sense and common feelings are sufficient to decide against every authority short of a positive law. *363 The

Brown v. Brown

72 Ohio St. 3d 1524 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1995

Brown v. Brown

684 So. 2d 940 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 6, 1996

In re Brown, Gayle Q.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 16,417; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28441-CA.

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.