Case law

Richey v. American Automobile Association, Inc.

380 Mass. 835 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 6, 1980

There may, indeed, be room for the observation that if the present facts should be held to qualify a discharged employee for relief, then a new practical definition might have to be given to employments theoretically terminable

Winfield v. State

172 Vt. 591 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jun 8, 2001

Thus, if the official’s conduct does not violate clearly-established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, the official is protected by qualified immunity from tort liability. Cook v. … Assessed in light of these standards, the trial court’s ruling on the issue of qualified immunity was sound.

Grant v. Riverside Corp.

364 Pa. Super. 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1987

Clearly, from a review of the above criteria, it is not mandatory that a contractor be the general contractor on a construction project to qualify as a statutory employer. … Clearly, this language is distinguishable from our Section 203, in its explicit extension of immunity to all contractors and subcontractors present at the job site and conducting the business of the injured employee’s direct

Davis v. State

Nevada Supreme Court · May 14, 2014

Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 197 (1984) (concluding that a § 1983 plaintiff bears the burden of overcoming the defendant's qualified immunity by showing that his constitutional rights were clearly … We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in finding that qualified immunity applied.

Mulligan v. Rioux

229 Conn. 716 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 28, 1994

In accordance with this established precedent, the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law only if, on the facts found, their conduct either did not violate “clearly established rights” of which … Fountain, supra, *742 915 F.2d 823 (“to establish the qualified immunity-defense, a police officer must satisfy one of two tests: either that his [or her] conduct did not violate ‘clearly established rights’ of which a reasonable

In the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., Father

857 N.W.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 26, 2014

However, when paternity was clearly established in Robert, the juvenile court, upon the guardian ad li-tem’s motion and after a hearing, properly dismissed him as a necessary party. … Juvenile courts clearly have the authority to make the factual determination of whether a person qualifies as a necessary party, which inherently requires them to determine whether a person qualifies as a child’s biological

Ross v. Columbia Newspapers, Inc.

266 S.C. 75 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 22, 1976

Since we agree with the trial judge’s determination that the articles were clearly not false or defamatory, we need not reach the question of qualified privilege. … And, we have held that a sufficient defense is made out where the evidence establishes that the statement was substantially true. Dauterman v. State-Record Co., 249 S. C. 512, 154 S. E. (2d) 919 (1967).

Juan Alberto Blanco Garcia v. State of Tennessee

425 S.W.3d 248 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2013

whether trial counsel performed deficiently, Padilla requires us to answer two questions: (1) whether deportation and the plea’s effect on the petitioner’s future eligibility to return legally to the United States were clearly … Blanco also acknowledged that neither immigration lawyer indicated specifically whether child abuse qualified as a crime involving moral turpitude, but instead recommended that the petitioner consult with trial counsel on

City of Houston v. Catrennia Foreman Sauls, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Dwayne Foreman, And Tristena Christian, as Next Friend of D.F., a Minor

Texas Supreme Court · May 10, 2024

. § 1983 “unequivocally negated the original interpretive premise for qualified immunity”); Zadeh, 928 F.3d at 479-81 (Willett, J., concurring) (criticizing the “clearly established law” standard). … See Chambers, 883 S.W.2d at 657 (although “federal immunity may be conferred at the summary judgment stage by the court’s finding that the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established,” “[n]o analogous threshold

SEPTA v. City of Phila., Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2014

The court concluded: “Clearly then, as an agency and instrumentality of the Commonwealth, SEPTA qualifies as an ‘employer’ for purposes of the [Human Relations] Act, subject to the jurisdiction of the [Pennsylvania Human … The fact that the Commonwealth Court did not employ the magic words -- sovereign immunity -- is of no consequence, as the court clearly recognized SEPTA’s enabling statute and its existence as a Commonwealth Agency subject

PALMIERI VS. CLARK CO.

2015 NV 102 · Nevada Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2015

Ct. 305, 308 (2015) ("The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established .. … A searching officer is entitled to qualified immunity if "a reasonable officer could have believed" that the search was lawful "in light of clearly established law and the information

Allstate Insurance v. Elwell

513 A.2d 269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 23, 1986

A contract is against public policy if it “clearly appears to be in violation of some well established rule of law, or that its tendency will be harmful to the interests of society.” Lesieur v. … MacDonald, 412 A.2d 71 (Me.1980), and parent-child immunity, Black v.

Condon v. State

332 Md. 481 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 1, 1993

established *493 by the State Treasurer. … We held that § 17-107(b) established a more limited waiver of the State’s immunity, without the precondi *496 tion of timely notice before suit was filed. Id. 327 Md. at 41 , 607 A.2d 552 .

Cory Burnett v. Phillip Smith and State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa · May 5, 2023

These include whether qualified immunity is available and what the standard should be, Baldwin I, 915 N.W.2d at 279–81; whether judicial process immunity is available, Venckus v. … Supp. 3d at 953 (“For the same reasons they must be denied federal qualified immunity on Clinton’s § 1983 claim, Officers Garrett, Steinkamp, and Minnehan must also be denied immunity under state law.”); Williams, 516

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Conway

152 Vt. 363 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Aug 25, 1989

first impression in a manner “not clearly foreshadowed”), and where its retroactive application would be inequitable. … First, we do not see this case as establishing a new rule of law..

Schroeder v. St. Louis County

708 N.W.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 26, 2006

Nevertheless, we extended official immunity to the teacher because the department policy itself was being challenged and the decision adopting the protocol involved sufficient judgment and discretion to qualify for official … He was not required by an established protocol to grade against traffic.

Weatherford Ex Rel. Michael L. v. State

206 Ariz. 529 · Arizona Supreme Court · Dec 17, 2003

Government officials performing discretionary functions, however, receive qualified immunity from § 1983 actions unless their conduct violated a clearly established constitutional or federal statutory *532 right of which … Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). ¶ 6 To overcome the social workers’ qualified immunity defense, Weatherford bears the initial burden of proving a violation of a clearly established

Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District

235 Conn. 1 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Aug 15, 1995

The legislative history of the act clearly establishes that it was intentionally patterned after the antitrust law of the federal government. See 14 H.R. Proc. … Id., 185. 25 In this case, the defendant did not specially plead any immunity defense — absolute or qualified.

Medina, Hector Rolando

475 S.W.3d 291 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 4, 2015

Is the State, in a post-conviction evidentiary hearing on a writ of habeas corpus, clearly prohibited from calling the writ applicant to testify— under a grant of both use and derivative-use immunity — about whether he was … We have recently recognized that “an issue of first impression can sometimes qualify for mandamus relief when the factual scenario has never been precisely addressed but the principle of law has been clearly established.”

People of Michigan v. Dametrius Benjamin Posey

Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2023

immunity rather than complete immunity applies where the prosecutor is acting as a police officer and not in the role of an advocate) (quotation marks and citation omitted). … The lead opinion does not address this important qualifier.