Case law

Brown v. . Brown

199 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1930

App., 204 ; Scott v. Carothers, 47 N. E. (Ind.), 389; Rocap v. Blackwell, 137 N. E. (Ind.), 726; Phillips v. Tribbey, 141 N. E. (Ind.), 262; Stonesifer v. Shriver, 59 At. (Md.), 139; Sullivan v. Horner, 7 At. (N. … C., 394 ; Parker v. Lewis, 13 N. C., 21 ; Ward v. Jones, 44 N. C., 127 ; Ray v. Honeycutt, 119 N. C., 510 .

Brown v. Brown

194 Mich. 578 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1917

This suit was then instituted against defendant Brown and his sureties to recover the penalty of the bond. … Defendant Brown defaulted in the performance of the contract and the plaintiff elected to, and did, declare the contract forfeited.

Brown v. Brown

27 Idaho 205 · Idaho Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1915

The record shows that said Snodgrass had boarded in the family of the plaintiff and defendant for three months or more and was a very frequent visitor at their home; that the plaintiff’s mother had lived in the family and … Mary Norris, had boarded for about three *208 months in the Brown family, she being the only witness who testified to having seen any act of sexual intercourse between the defendant and said Snodgrass.

Brown v. Brown

96 Kan. 510 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 6, 1915

Brown and his wife to' his son, W. O. Brown, on the ground of want of mental capacity, fraud and undue influence. A judgment was rendered for the defendants and the plaintiffs appeal. … In Hill v.

Brown v. Brown

243 S.C. 383 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Dec 31, 1963

Brown v. Brown, 239 S. C. 444, 123 S. E. (2d) 772 . The instant appeal imputes error to the trial court in awarding the husband a divorce and denying the wife’s prayer for attorneys’ fees. … Brown v. Brown, 215 S. C. 502, 56 S. E. (2d) 330 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 163; Fogel v. McDonald, 159 S. E. 506 , 157 S. E. 830 .

Brown v. Brown

265 Ill. 546 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1914

Brown, filed against her husband, the appellee, Edward M. … (Sharp v. Sharp, 116 Ill. 509 .)

Brown v. Brown

22 Mich. 299 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1871

Hinrichs v. General Motors of Canada, Ltd.

222 So. 3d 1114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 24, 2016

Brown, 564 U.S. 915 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … Goodyear [Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown], 564 U.S. [915] at 919, 131 S.Ct. [2846] at 2851 [(2011)]; see also Burger King Corp. v.

Brown v. Brown

107 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 25, 1901

White’s Equity Cases, 244; Adams’ Equity, side page 128, note 2; Little v. Brown, 2 Leigh, 353 . … These principles were recognized and applied in the case of Anna Gregg v. Charles Jones, 5 Heis., 443. See, also, Lane v. Logue, 12 Lea, 685 .

Brown v. Brown

914 P.2d 206 · Alaska Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1996

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS Ruth Brown and Donald Brown were married in 1981. They have three children. During the marriage Ruth was primarily a homemaker, although she attended college briefly early in the marriage. … However, in Dixon v.

Brown v. Brown

796 S.W.2d 5 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1990

Brown filed a Petition for Dissolution against her husband, Barry L. Brown, on July 20, 1980, appending to it a Property Settlement Agreement executed the same day. … Ruby v. Shouse, 476 S.W.2d at 825 .

Thares v. Brown County Board of Equalization

616 N.W.2d 380 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2000

Thares (Thares) appeal the Brown County Board of Equalization’s (County) assessment of their property, which was based on SDCL 10-6-33.14. Thares challenge the constitutionality of this statute. We affirm. … However, the board of county commissioners may increase the minimum acre requirement up to one hundred sixty acres.

Brown v. Brown

306 N.Y. 788 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1954

Brown v. Brown

332 Ark. 235 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 12, 1998

The Arkansas Court of Appeals later held that her marital share included any postdecretal cost-of-living increases which enhanced the amount of Billy Brown’s pension. Brown v. Brown 38 Ark. … Phyllis Brown’s second argument is that the chancellor erred in concluding that Askins v.

Brown v. Brown

248 Md. 139 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 5, 1967

By virtue of its visit to this Court in 1952 (Brown v. Brown, 199 Md. 585 , 87 A. 2d 626 ) and again in 1954 (Brown v. Brown, 204 Md. 197 , 103 A. 2d 856 ) it now has a clear title to the status of unwelcome visitor. … She relies on Whitelock v. Whitelock, 156 Md. 115 , 143 Atl. 712 (1928), Collier v. Collier, 182 Md. 82 , 32 A. 2d 469 (1943), Elko v. Elko, 187 Md. 161 , 49 A. 2d 441 (1946) and Brown v.

Brown v. . Brown

49 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1856

Brown, dec’d., and by a proper construction of the bond it extends to all matters and things for, and on account of which, the defendant was liable, as executor, and in which the parties, who were children of the testator

Brown v. Brown

240 Va. 376 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Nov 9, 1990

Brown (Thomas) and Florence B. Brown (Florence) were married in 1952. Between 1953 and 1966, four children were born of the marriage. During that time, the parties jointly acquired a residence in Petersburg. … Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972); Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals, 237 Va. 87, 97 , 376 S.E.2d 525, 530 (1989).

Brown v. Brown

110 Me. 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1913

The following cases are of that class: Quinebaug Bank v. Tarbox, 20 Conn., 510 ; Downer v. Garland, 21 Vt., 362 ; Blackwood v. Brown, 34 Mich., 4 ; State v. Dougherty, 45 Mo., 294 ; Griffin v. … Gibbs, 75 Iowa, 537 ; Trawick v. Martin Brown Co., 74 Texas, 522 ; Grider v. Appersen Co., 32 Ark., 332; Chamberlain v. Eckert, 2 Biss., 124 ; Moore v. Hopkins, 83 Cal., 270 ; Dyer v.

Brown v. Brown

47 S.D. 168 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1924

In Martin v. Martin, 150 Iowa 223 , 129 N. … In Walton v. Walton, 57 Neb. 102 , 77 N.

Brown v. Brown

26 So. 3d 1222 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 2009

Brown v. Brown, 26 So.3d 1210 (Ala.Civ.App.2007). After reviewing the record in this case, we affirm. Facts and Procedural History The parties were married on August 10, 1996. … Lucy, 998 So.2d 460 (Ala.2008) (quoting Reed v. Board of Trs. for Alabama State Univ., 778 So.2d 791, 795 (Ala.2000)).