Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.17s
35 Minn. 191 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 21, 1886
Brown and David A. Brown by default, they made application to said court, upon statutory grounds, to have the judgment set aside, and for leave to answer. … Brown died intestate, and proceedings upon the application were accordingly suspended. Mary A.
Cited 3 timesPublished11 Haw. 47 · Hawaii Supreme Court · May 4, 1897
Irene Haalou Ii Brown and grandfather of her children. … In answering the fifth question the court concludes that Irene Haalou Ii Brown has an estate in fee simple in the property devised to her by her father’s will. Upon this point the case of Hemen v.
Cited 9 timesPublished287 P.2d 913 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1955
representative, of the Pearl Brown estate. … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, J., •concur in result.
Cited 7 timesPublished3 Cal. 111 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1853
This cause comes within the rule laid down by us in Russel v. Armador, * in which we decided that the court below, sitting as a jury, must find separately the facts and conclusions of law. … Judgment reversed as to Groves, and new trial ordered; judgment as to Brown affirmed; costs to abide the event. See 2d California Reports, 305.
Cited 1 timesPublished103 Kan. 53 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 11, 1918
Brown or Lula Brown, 1102 Kansas Ave.” Nellie A. … A leading case is Roberts v. Roberts, 115 Ga. 259 .
Cited 5 timesPublished607 P.2d 1358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1980
However, as we said in White v. … Pope v. Pope, 116 Okl. 188 , 243 P. 962 (1926); Cornelius v. Cornelius, 82 Okl. 195 , 199 P. 1115 (1921).
Cited 6 timesPublished120 R.I. 340 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jun 23, 1978
We remanded the case for a hearing on that motion, Brown v. … In Brown v. Brown, 24 N.J.
Cited 5 timesPublished103 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889
This is an application to rehear the case of Brown v. Brown, decided at the last term. … The counsel for the appellants, on the argument of the appeal, insisted strongly that the treaty had such effect, and cited Strother v. Cathey, 1 Murph., 162 , and other cases, in support of their contention.
Cited 4 timesPublished232 Iowa 1265 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 9, 1943
Shors v. Shors, 133 Iowa 22 , 110 N. W. 16 ; *1268 Shipley v. Shipley, 187 Iowa 1295, 1306 , 175 N. W. 51 . … See, also, Tallmon v. Tallmon, 166 Iowa 370, 377 , 147 N. W. 746 ; Shipley v. Shipley, 187 Iowa 1295, 1306 , 175 N. W. 51 ; Krotz v. Krotz, 209 Iowa 433, 434 , 288 N. W. 30 .
Cited 6 timesPublished44 N.H. 281 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jul 1, 1860
. *284 418; Harvey v. Harvey, 2 P. Wms. 22, and note; Heath v. Perry, 3 Atk. 101; Inchedon v. Northcate, 3 Atk. 438; Healey v. Greenbank, 3 Atk. 716 ; Anon., 2 Vern. 199 ; Cloberry v. Lampsen, 2 Freem. 24 ; Smell v. … Dee, 2 Salk. 415; Boe v. Lee, 3 T. R. 41; Cricket v. Dolby, 3 Ves. Jr. 10, and note, p. 17; May v. Wood, 3 Ves. 399, and notes; Booth v. Booth, 4 Ves. 399, and notes a, and 3 ; Hanson v. Graham, 6 Ves. 239 ; Shattuck v.
Cited 1 timesPublished184 Ga. 827 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 10, 1937
To so much of said judgment as refused to have Brown attached for contempt and committed to jail, Mrs. Brown excepted. … The ruling in Justices v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAlabama State Board of Education v. Brown
565 So. 2d 256 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 22, 1990
Mills v. Ozark City Board of Education, 376 So.2d 747 (Ala.Civ.App.1979). … Dickey v. McClammy, 452 So.2d 1315 (Ala.1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Board of Medical Examiners v. Brown
10 N.J. Misc. 998 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 27, 1932
One Golda Swerdlow-Badin, coming before Judge Brown on a writ of habeas corpus, was by him ordered released from custody under a commitment of the First District Court of Jersey City in a proceeding under the Medicine and … Judge Brown regarded this as controlling and released the defendant. We think it has nothing to do with the ease. 1. The Practice act is not applicable to these summary proceedings under special statutes. 2.
Cited 1 timesPublished64 Mich. 82 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1887
See Ryerson v. Eldred, 18 Mich. 490 ; Taylor v. Boardman, 25 Id. 527 , and notes to those decisions as reprinted.
Cited 2 timesPublished947 P.2d 307 · Alaska Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1997
On July 6, 1994, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment, Brown v. Brown, No. 0730 (Brown I). … Brown I, at 3. In Brown I, we reversed “the superior court’s determination that the $250,000 was marital property.”
Cited 12 timesPublished16 Ark. 202 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1855
the two accounts marked B and C,. referred to in the testimony of James Brown. … ’s contracts, and denied that he ever had anything to do with the money advanced by appel-lee to Isaac Brown; that appellant said to appellee: “ I came here with Isaac Brown, when he came to borrow the money, but did I open
Cited 2 timesPublished199 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1930
App., 204 ; Scott v. Carothers, 47 N. E. (Ind.), 389; Rocap v. Blackwell, 137 N. E. (Ind.), 726; Phillips v. Tribbey, 141 N. E. (Ind.), 262; Stonesifer v. Shriver, 59 At. (Md.), 139; Sullivan v. Horner, 7 At. (N. … C., 394 ; Parker v. Lewis, 13 N. C., 21 ; Ward v. Jones, 44 N. C., 127 ; Ray v. Honeycutt, 119 N. C., 510 .
Cited 2 timesPublished37 N.C. 309 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1842
Isaac Brown, by his will, devised and be-queated to his wife and children severally, lands and personal property. … Freeman v Knight, 2 lred. Eq. Rep. 76.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna