Case law

Brown v. Brown

103 Ind. 23 · Indiana Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1885

Brown, of the first part, and Elijah C. Brown, of the second part. This is to certify that we, of the first part, did obtain of Elijah C. … Brown.” It is alleged that Solon H.

Brown v. Brown

381 Mass. 231 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 30, 1980

In Lewis v. … Shook v. Crabb, 281 N.W.2d 616 (Iowa 1979). MacDonald v. MacDonald, 412 A.2d 71 (Me. 1980). Imig v. March, 203 Neb. 537 (1979). Merenoff v. Merenoff, 76 N.J. 535 (1978). Digby v. Digby, R.I. (1978). a Coffindaffer v.

Brown v. Brown

676 S.W.2d 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1984

A dissenting judge transferred the case here because of a jurisdictional problem, certifying conflict with Timmings v. Timmings, 628 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.App.1982). … Our authority is circumscribed by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

Brown v. Brown

261 Iowa 591 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 9, 1968

Jensen v. Jensen, 237 Iowa 1323, 1324 , 25 N.W.2d 316, 317 ; York v. York, 246 Iowa 132, 135, 136 , 67 N.W.2d 28, 33 ; Smith v. Smith, 257 Iowa 584, 589 , 133 N.W.2d 677, 680 . … York v. York, supra. Blundi v. Blundi, 243 Iowa 1219, 1226 , 55 N.W.2d 239, 241 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 200 Iowa 415, 417 , 203 N.W. 26 .

Brown v. Brown

214 So. 2d 617 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 15, 1968

Brown v. Brown

43 So. 2d 721 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 5, 1949

State v. Williams

137 Wash. 2d 746 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1999

As Judge Brown correctly noted: “Mr. … App. at 352 (Brown, J., dissenting).

Brown v. Brown

41 Cal. 88 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

.: The plaintiff having brought an action against her then husband, one George Brown, obtained a decree of divorce from him upon the ground of extreme cruelty. He seems content with the decree, and does not- appeal. … Brown, a brother of George Brown (who was, therefore, made a defendant, and is the sole appellant here), in trust for George, who is alleged to be the true owner, etc.

Brown v. Brown

159 Ga. 323 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 12, 1924

Swearingen v. Swearingen, 19 Ga. 265 ; Carlton v. Carlton, 44 Ga. 216 ; Smith v. Smith, 125 Ga. 384 ( 53 S. E. 958 ).

Brown v. Brown

276 Ala. 153 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 16, 1964

Goodman v. McMillan, supra. … Johnson v.

Brown v. Brown

9 La. Ann. 310 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1854

In the case of Ross v. Pagoud, 2 L.

Brown v. . Brown

195 N.C. 315 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1928

Brown and Tulie C. Brown, father of Bruce Brown, nothing, and the will refers to the contracts in which they agree that they have received their full share. It is said in Patterson v. McCormick, 181 N. … Edmonson v. Leigh, 189 N. C., 196 ; Scales v. Barringer, 192 N. C., 94 ; Walker v. Trollinger, 192 N. C., 744 . For the reason given the judgment below is Affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Zier v. Chesapeake Beach Railway Co.

98 Md. 35 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 4, 1903

Wonder v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 32 Md. 418 ; State, use of Hamlin v. Malster & Reaney, 57 Md. 287 ; Mayor, &c., Balto., v. War, 77 Md. 593 . … Co. v. State, use of Nelson, 82 Md. 293, we have a different situation presented.

Brown v. Brown

49 S.D. 167 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1925

Keyes v. Baskerville, 41 S. D. 214, 170 N. W. 143 . We will consider first the matter of the appeal from the judgment.

Brown v. Brown

101 So. 2d 135 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 15, 1957

Brown v. Brown

43 Ind. 474 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1873

Brown, James A. Brown, Charles Brown, and Catharine Brown, guardian, etc. … Brown, James A. Brown, and Charles Brown, had not yet attained to the age of twenty-one years respectively, and were not therefore yet entitled, under said will, to any of the said real estate.

Brown v. . Brown

103 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

Reynolds v. Flinn, 1 Hay., 123 (106); Avery v. Strother, Conf. R., 434; Lovinggood v. Burgess, Busb., 407, and cases there cited. … In the case of Strother v.

Brown v. Brown

104 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

Co. v. Collins, 47 Okla. 761 , 150 Pac. 142 ; Allison v. Bryan, 50 Okla. 677 , 151 Pac. 610 ; Badger Oil Co. v. Clay, 83 Okla. 25 , 200 Pac. 433 ; Slick Oil Co. v. Coffey, 72 Okla. 32 , 177 Pac. 915 . … Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist Church, 27 Okla. 473 , 112 Pac. 1127 ; Rhone Milling Co. v. Farmers, Etc., Bank, 40 Okla. 131 , 156 Pac. 1095 ; Reynolds v. Hill, 28 Okla. 533 , 114 Pac. 1108 ; Avants v.

Brown v. Brown

2 N.J. 252 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1949

Brown, and dismissing a counterclaim of the appellant, Lillian Brown. Both petition and counter-claim were based upon simple desertion. … McShane v. McShane, 45 N. J. Eq. 341, 19 A. 465 (E. & A. 1888); Hague v. Hague, 85 N. J. Eq. 537, 96 A. 579 (E. & A. 1915).

York Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Brown

407 Pa. 649 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1962

As succinctly stated by this same lower court in York Township Zoning Board v. … Brown, 74 York 197 (1960) “In the abstract, it is highly desirable in the zoning process that pre-existing land subdivisions should conform to later zoning laws.