Case law

Brown v. Westerfield

47 Neb. 399 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1896

(Byington v. Moore, 62 Ia., 470 ; Hinson v. Bailey, 73 Ia., 544 ; Black v. Hoyt, 33 O. St., 203; Lessee of Mitchell v. Ryan, 3 O. St., 377; Albright v. Albright, 70 Wis., 528 ; Ball v. Foreman, 37 O. … (Bunz v. Cornelius, 19 Neb., 107 ; Connell v. Galligher, 39 Neb., 793 .)

Paulette v. Brown

40 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

In the case of the State v. … In the case of the State v.

Brown v. Hows

163 Tenn. 178 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1931

In Stratton v. … The foregoing was approved in Hascall v. Hafford, 107 Tenn., 355 , and language of the same import was used in Brown v. Brown, 150 Tenn., 89 . In Denny v.

Brown v. Siegel

191 Wis. 256 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1926

Ellis v. Barron County, 120 Wis. 390 , 98 N. W. 232 . No written notice of the entry of the order having been served, the appeal was within time.

Polhill v. Brown

84 Ga. 338 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 31, 1890

Brown to convey the land to him (Wilson Brown) to secure him (Wilson Brown) for standing security for him (Polhill) to said Ellis. … Brown to make to Wilson Brown was a security for a debt. Polhill was the owner of the land, and Wilson Brown held it merely as a security or indemnity.

Price v. . Brown

98 N.Y. 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885

(Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ; Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 id. 92.) … In Pease v.

People v. Brown

24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969

Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.

Maddox v. Brown

71 Me. 432 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1880

Herlihy v. Smith, 116 Mass. 265 . So in Sheridan v. … Howe v. Newmarch, 12 Allen, 49 . The relation of master and servant must exist at the time of the injui-y.

State v. Brown

300 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Appeal of Defendant Brown Defendant Brown first assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the charged offenses. … State v. Scott, supra.

Brown v. Kennedy

141 Ohio St. 457 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1943

That she was attending Wilmington College at said time, and using said automobile to go to and from her home in Hamersville, Brown county, Ohio.

State v. Brown

115 Mo. 409 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 2, 1893

State v. Loehr, 93 Mo. 103 ; State v. Austin, 113 Mo. 538 . II. … State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. loc. cit. 120. V.

Mitchell v. . Brown

88 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

The answer admits the defendant to be in possession of a part only of the land embraced in the plaintiff’s boundaries, and, denying his title thereto, avers the same to belong to his father, *157 Henry Brown, who let him … Is the land in controversy in this action, and no other, the same that was in controversy in the action of Henry Brown against Moses Mitchell, Gabriel Mitchell, Mexico Mitchell and Doctor Mitchell, tried at fall term, 1874

Cuddy v. Brown

78 Ill. 415 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

of Brown. … He was only twelve years old at Brown’s death.

Ashley v. . Brown

198 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1930

Ed., 1149 ; Wilkinson v. Wright, 1 N. C., 422 ; Peace v. Nailing, 16 N. C., 289, 296 ; Merwin v. Ballard, 66 N. C., 398 ; Greer v. Asheville, 114 N. C., 678 ; Mann v. Allen, 171 N. C., 219 ; Waddill v. Masten, 172 N. … See Poti v. N. E. Road Machinery Co., 140 Vt., 587 ; S. v. Johnston, 79 N. J. L., 49, 74 At., 538 ; Kane v. State, 81 N. J. L., 594, 80 At., 453 ; Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U. S., 160 , 62 L. Ed., 222 .

People v. Brown

56 Ill. 2d 312 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1974

(Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 .) … A two-page statement was taken and Officer Lenz testified that the statement “bears the signature of Richard Brown.”

Brown v. French

104 Pa. 604 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1883

It is possible that he might have accomplished his purpose and passed in safety the head of the Brown’s tow, had his oars not been unshipped or broken, but this resulted from no act of the crew of the' Charlie Brown ; it … So the pilot of the Charlie Brown may have made a mistake in not backing his boat, but he cannot be charged with negligence.

Brown v. Wallis

100 Tex. 546 · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 1907

BROWN, Associate Justice. … In King v.

Brown v. Babcock

3 Mass. 29 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 15, 1807

Brown v. Matthews

79 Ga. 1 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 5, 1887

Brown, formerly Mrs. Lowe, suing in her *6 own behalf and as next friend of her minor children. The defendants were the father and the brother of the deceased, together with their tenant, Matthews.

Heintz v. Brown

80 N.Y.2d 998 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1992

In this regard, the court’s scope of review is limited to an assessment of whether there is a rational basis for the administrative determination without disturbing underlying factual determinations (Matter of Pell v Board