Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

2.98s

  • State v. Brown

    22 N.J. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 1956

    murder in the second degree on an indictment returned the prior February 8 charging that on April 17, 1951 he did “willfully, feloniously and of his malice, aforethought kill and murder Margaret Jones, also known as Margaret Brown … See also State v. Zellers, 7 N. J. L. 220 (Sup. Ct. 1824); Graves v. State, 45 N. J. L. 347 (E. & A. 1883); State v. Moynihan, 93 N. J. L. 253 (E. & A. 1919); State v. Lederman, 112 N. J. L. 366 (E. & A. 1934); Rex v.

    Cited 100 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Brown

    181 Kan. 301 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 11, 1957

    Brown and Bernard Brown, doing business as Harry Brown Motors, appellants, will be referred to as the defendants. … (Harmon v. Coonrod, 148 Kan. 146 , 79 P. 2d 831 ; Ehrsam v. Brown, 76 Kan. 206 , 91 Pac. 179 ; Richardson v. G. W. Mfg. Co., 3 Kan. App. 445 , 43 Pac. 809 ; Machinery Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Staples v. Brown

    113 Tenn. 639 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1904

    Tbe cases of McGrath v. Logue, Spears v. Logue, Friedman v. Mathes, Saunders v. Russell, Shelby County v. Railroad Co., Nashville v. Smith and Scovel v. … The cases of Wade v. Murry, 2 Sneed, 50 ; Knight, Ex parte, 3 Lea, 402 , and Tomlinson v. Board of Equalization, 8 8 Tenn., 1 , 12 S. W., 414 , 6 L. R.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    172 N.W.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 12, 1969

    State v. … Instruction 9 in State v. Horrell, supra, is substantially identical to instruction 6 in this case. Here the court added an additional paragraph not found in Horrell but which is not involved in Brown’s contention.

    Disagreed with by State v. Sloan, 1972 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 985 (1972)Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    210 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1904

    Chalfant v. Edwards, supra, and McCleary v. … In Malloy v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rhodes

    1 Kan. 359 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jul 15, 1863

    The third is, that the judgment was for Rhodes, and should have been for Brown.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Eddy v. Brown

    715 P.2d 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1986

    Brown, Jr. [Brown] and his foreman, Dallas D. Wilson, Jr. [Wilson], all of whom will be called collectively “employer,” for the tort of outrage 1 and invasion of privacy. … rest on a scenario unfolded by these facts: [1] Texaco did not efficiently handle his workers’ compensation claim; [2] Texaco was negatively disposed towards him because of his complaint with the National Labor Relations Board

    Cited 118 timesPublished
  • Shaul v. Brown

    28 Iowa 37 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 11, 1869

    and concealed the same; and that such taking was, without any claim of right, known to Brown; and find that those facts alone were known to Brown; and that Brown made a reasonable effort to ascertain the facts of the case … was guilty in point of fact, nor whether Brown, in fact, believed him guilty; but the question is, were the facts and circumstances, within Brown’s knowledge and upon which he acted, sufficient in themselves to raise a reasonable

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    443 S.W.2d 261 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1969

    Trammell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 445 S.W.2d 190 ; Miller v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 442 S.W.2d 340 ; Houston v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 428 S.W.2d 353 ; Price v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 410 S.W.2d 778 . … See Miller v. State, supra; McDuff v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 431 S.W.2d 547 ; Weeks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 417 S.W.2d 716 ; cert. den. 389 U.S. 996 , 88 S.Ct. 500 , 19 L.Ed.2d 494 ; Jones v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Brown

    2 Serg. & Rawle 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1816

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. . Brown

    80 N.Y. 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1880

    (Mechanics’ Bank v. The N. Y. and N. H. R. R. Co., 13 N. Y., 599 ; Bruff v. Mali, 36 id., 200; Morgan v. Skiddy, 62 id. 319; Shotwell v. Mali, 38 Barb., 445 .) … (Risley v. Indianapolis, B. and W. R. R. Co., 62 N. Y., 240 ; Butts v. Wood, 37 id., 317 ; Stewart v. The Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 9 Vroom, 506 ; Gardner v. Butler, 30 N. J. Eq., 703; Foster v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lunt

    37 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

    Fowler v. Bebee, 9 Mass. 231 ; Nason v. Dillingham, 15 Mass. 170 ; Bucknam v. Ruggles, 15 Mass. 180 ; Commonwealth v. Kirby, 2 Cush. 577 ; Plymouth v. … Heywood v Hildreth, 9 Mass. 393 ; Brown v. Maine Bank, 11 Mass. 133 ; Waterhouse v. Waite, 11 Mass. 207 ; Cushing v. Arnold, 9 Met. 26 . But in Allen v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Brown v. French

    125 Mass. 410 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 3, 1878

    In the leading case of Harvard College v. … Lovell v. *416 Minot, 20 Pick. 116 . Kinmonth v. Brigham, 5 Allen, 270 , 277. Clark v. Garfield, 8 Allen, 427 . If a more strict and precise rule should be deemed expedient, it must be enacted by the Legislature.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    130 Va. 733 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 29, 1921

    See also, Martin v. State, 89 Ala. 115, 120 , 8 So. 23 , 18 Am. St. Rep. 91 ; Peden v. State, 61 Miss. 267, 270 ; People v. Vasquez, 49 Cal. 560, 563 ; State v. Darling, 216 Mo. 450 , 115 S. W. 1002 , 23 L. R. A. (N. … In Peden v.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    205 S.C. 514 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 17, 1945

    State v. Staggs, 186 S. C., 151, 195 S. E., 130 ; State v. Dixon, 181 S. C., 1, 186 S. E., 531 ; State v. Hanahan, 111 S. C., 58, 96 S. E., 667 . … State v. Prince, 165 S. C., 115, 162 S. E., 777 ; State v. Gellis, 158 S. C., 471, 155 S. E., 849 ; State v. Rush, 129 S. C., 43, 123 S. E., 765 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    229 Ill. 2d 374 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2008

    In People v. … See also People v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    315 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1985

    The Brown decision, however, did not address specific allegations of illegality nor premise its ruling on those grounds. … State v. Bullard, 312 N.C. 129 , 322 S.E. 2d 370 (1984); State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 (1988)Cited 157 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Porter

    10 Mass. 93 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 15, 1813

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    640 S.W.2d 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 22, 1982

    Bullard v. State, 533 S.W.2d 812 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Nitcholas v. State, 524 S.W.2d 689 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Turner v. State, 486 S.W.2d 797 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). … Garcia v. State, 573 S.W.2d 12 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Haynes v. State, 627 S.W.2d 710 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    437 S.W.2d 828 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1968

    In Acosta v. … After some 45 minutes of searching, a display case was raised and in a spot inaccessible except by raising the entire case, the searching officers found a brown paper bag.

    Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.