Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.76s
14 Wash. 155 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1896
Co. v. Crider, 91 Tenn. 489 ( 19 S. W. 618 ); Gulf, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 18 S. W. 723 ; Jacksonville, etc., Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublished67 Tex. 318 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1887
(Signed) James Brown, Oo. Judge.” … (Cyrus v. Hicks, 20 Texas, 483 .)
Cited 26 timesPublished757 S.W.2d 739 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1988
Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 146 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1985, pet. granted). … Brown v. State, id., at 150. If the facts were such that consent had in reality been a contested issue the court of appeals would have undoubtedly been correct in its analysis.
Cited 57 timesPublished111 Wash. 2d 124 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1988
Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 43 , 83 L. Ed. 2d 443 , 105 S. Ct. 460 (1984). Finally, we turn to Brown's remaining issue. … Thereafter the court was informed that Brown would not take the stand and the parole officer was dismissed. Brown argues that because he was not advised of his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v.
Cited 146 timesPublished593 P.2d 187 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1979
Co. v. America v. Sinclair, supra. … “Gross negligence” appears in Wyoming statutes in ten places: § 15-l-707(j), W.S.1977, exempts boards of adjustment from assessment of costs on appeal to district court unless act was “with gross negligence or in bad faith
Cited 90 timesPublishedBoard of Overseers of the Bar v. Donald F. Brown
301 A.3d 793 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 24, 2023
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. DONALD F. BROWN PER CURIAM [¶1] Donald F. … Most v. Most, 477 A.2d 250, 258 (Me. 1984); see Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished255 Wis. 147 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · May 3, 1949
Defendant Brown at that time was operating an automobile in a westerly direction on an intersecting highway. The Breitzman car and the Brown car collided in the intersection formed by these highways. … W. 403 ; Narloch v. Church, 234 Wis. 155 , 290 N. W. 595 ; Ainsworth v. Berg, 253 Wis. 438 , 34 N. W. (2d) 790 , 35 N. W. (2d) 911 .
Cited 10 timesPublished71 Tex. 470 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1888
(Railway v. Murphy, 46 Texas, 356 ; Railway v. Spicker, 61 Texas, 427 ; Railway v. Cowser, 57 Texas, 293 .) … The judgment in this case, as in that of Brown, Receiver v. Brown, decided at a former day of this term, attempts to make the recovery a lien upon the earnings, etc., of the railroad in the hands of the receiver.
Cited 82 timesPublished1 Paige Ch. 147 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 5, 1828
Nelson v. McDonald & others, 6 John. Ch. R. 201.) The agreement between Brown and the Lynches was void for want of mutuality. • It could not have been enforced by Brown. (Tucker v. Woods, 12 John. R. 190.) … (Prec. in Chan. 519; Rice v. Peet, 15 John. 503 ; Botsford v. Burr, 2 John. Ch. R. 405.) Where there is a part payment of money, there will be a resulting trust pro tanto. Here was a fraud committed by Brown.
Cited 37 timesPublished167 Mass. 144 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 11, 1896
See Jacquins v. Commonwealth, 9 Cush. 279 ; Upham v. Raymond, 132 Mass. 186 ; Wood v. Westborough, 140 Mass. 403 ; Nott v. C. T. Sampson Manuf. … Commonwealth v. Green, 17 Mass. 515 , 534. State v. Blaisdell, 59 N. H. 328. Gannon v. People, 127 Ill. 507, 522 . Veatch v. State, 60 Ind. 291, 295 . People v. Hardisson, 61 Cal. 378 . State v. Stephens, *149 13 S.
Cited 42 timesPublished551 S.W.2d 329 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 9, 1977
It specifically stated: “We cannot say that the evidence excludes all reasonable hypothesis save guilt on the part of Redden and Clarence Ray Brown in that ease.” The Court then cited Marie v. … In Marie v.
Cited 591 timesPublished68 N.H. 200 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 5, 1894
“Reg. v. Meek, 9 C. & P.513; State v. Whittemore, 50 N. H. 245, 248. *201 The fact that the forbidden words express the truth does not justify their use. … Rex v. Griepe, 1 Ld. Raym. 256, 258,— 2 Salk. 513; Reg. v. Overton, 1 Car. & Mar. 655; Reg. v. Muscot, 10 Mod. 192, 195; Commonwealth v. Pollard, 12 Met. 225 ; People v. Courtney, 94 N. Y. 490 ; State v. Norris, 9 N.
Cited 13 timesPublished692 S.W.2d 497 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1985
Brown v. State, 667 S.W.2d 630 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1984). … Brown, supra, at 633 .
Cited 118 timesPublished73 Pa. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1873
. & R. 14; Chess v. Chess, 17 Id. 409; Moore v. Pearson, 6 W. & S. 50 , and Rhine v. … In Anthony v.
Cited 33 timesPublished129 Ohio St. 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1935
Although adhering to the principle frequently announced and recently applied in negligence cases in Knisely v. Community Traction Co., 125 Ohio St., 131 , 180 N. E., 654 , and Binder v. Youngstown Municipal Ry. … As stated in the opinion in Schell v. DuBois, Admr., 94 Ohio St., 93 , 113 N. E., 664 , L. R.
Cited 108 timesPublished173 Miss. 542 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1935
Baird v. State, 146 Miss. 547 , 112 So. 705 ; Morris v. State, 148 Miss. 680 , 114 So. 750 . … Atkinson v. State, 137 Miss. 42 , 101 So. 490 . Appellants next complain of the refusal of two instructions requested by them, Nos. 9 and 10.
Cited 13 timesPublished117 Ohio St. 3d 1479 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text262 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1972
In Gavieres v. … In Waller v.
Overruled on other grounds by State v. Hammang, 271 Or. 749 (1975)Cited 153 timesPublished297 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1984
The next day, and again on April 8, the victim identified the defendant, Alvin Brown, as the perpetrator of the crimes by picking his photograph out of a photographic display. … .”); People v.
Limited by Snow v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 308 Or. 259 (1989)Cited 244 timesPublished128 Ohio St. 3d 153 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010
Brown, C.J. I. … State v. Winn, 121 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2009-Ohio-1059 , 905 N.E.2d 154, at ¶ 39 (Moyer, C.J., dissenting). {¶ 34} In Brown, the defendant stabbed her boyfriend once in the abdomen.
Abrogated in part by State v. Ruff, 143 Ohio St. 3d 114 (2015)Cited 945 timesPublished
Ask Donna