Case law

Jolliefe v. Brown

14 Wash. 155 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1896

Co. v. Crider, 91 Tenn. 489 ( 19 S. W. 618 ); Gulf, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 18 S. W. 723 ; Jacksonville, etc., Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

People v. Brown

80 N.Y.2d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1993

Defendant notes that this Court, in developing its excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, has accepted Dean Wigmore’s analysis (see, e.g., People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 ; People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, 71-72 ). … Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 , supra).

Ford v. United States

533 A.2d 617 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1987

The premise of our adversarial system is that appellate courts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research, but essentially as arbiters of legal questions presented and argued by the parties before them … See Harris v.

Brown v. Lynch

1 Paige Ch. 147 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 5, 1828

Nelson v. McDonald & others, 6 John. Ch. R. 201.) The agreement between Brown and the Lynches was void for want of mutuality. • It could not have been enforced by Brown. (Tucker v. Woods, 12 John. R. 190.) … (Prec. in Chan. 519; Rice v. Peet, 15 John. 503 ; Botsford v. Burr, 2 John. Ch. R. 405.) Where there is a part payment of money, there will be a resulting trust pro tanto. Here was a fraud committed by Brown.

State v. Brown

38 Ohio St. 3d 305 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1988

This evidence, according to the state, establishes Storey was murdered and robbed by Brown. In State v. … Darden v. Wainwright, supra. In this case, defense counsel at *317 tempted to shift the blame from Brown to co-defendant Coleman.

State v. Brown

169 Wash. 2d 195 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2010

Per Curiam ¶1 — Maurice Brown seeks review of an unpublished Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction for escape. State v. Brown, noted at 153 Wn. App. 1003 , 2009 WL 3739446 , 2009 Wash. App. LEXIS 2816 . … But the Court Appeals went on to hold that Brown was not prejudiced by the failure to allege the knowledge element. This is not the proper analysis. See State v. Marcum, 116 Wn.

Brown v. State

692 S.W.2d 497 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1985

Brown v. State, 667 S.W.2d 630 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1984). … Brown, supra, at 633 .

Brown v. State

291 Ga. 887 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 5, 2012

See Horton v. State, 234 Ga. … See Howe v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

73 Pa. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1873

. & R. 14; Chess v. Chess, 17 Id. 409; Moore v. Pearson, 6 W. & S. 50 , and Rhine v. … In Anthony v.

Brown v. Glover

408 Utah Adv. Rep. 12 · Utah Supreme Court · Nov 14, 2000

Brown claims that the merits of the summary judgment, in particular, the applicability of Schnuphase v. … See Griffiths v. Hammon, 560 P.2d 1375, 1376 (Utah 1977); see also Lundgreen v.

Brown v. Levin

119 Ohio St. 3d 335 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2008

See Dupee v. … See, e.g., Weastec, Inc. v. Highland Cty.

Brown v. State

173 Miss. 542 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1935

Baird v. State, 146 Miss. 547 , 112 So. 705 ; Morris v. State, 148 Miss. 680 , 114 So. 750 . … Atkinson v. State, 137 Miss. 42 , 101 So. 490 . Appellants next complain of the refusal of two instructions requested by them, Nos. 9 and 10.

State v. Brown

117 Ohio St. 3d 1479 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2008

State v. Brown

262 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1972

In Gavieres v. … In Waller v.

State v. Brown

297 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1984

The next day, and again on April 8, the victim identified the defendant, Alvin Brown, as the perpetrator of the crimes by picking his photograph out of a photographic display. … .”); People v.

Brown v. NAGELHOUT

37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 225 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 15, 2012

We have for review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Brown v. … The Fourth District rejected the Browns’ argument.

Commonwealth v. Brown

90 Va. 671 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Mar 29, 1894

Upon their arraignment the defendants elected to be tried separately, and the first question arising upon the trial of the plaintiff' in error, Brown, relates to the action of the court in calling as a witness the said Boush … The case is very similar to the well considered case of State v.

Brown v. State

698 N.E.2d 779 · Indiana Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1998

Both parties assume that Brown’s claim is controlled by Mitchem v. … Brown also relies on Brewer v. State, 646 N.E.2d 1382 (Ind.1995).

Thompson v. Brown

4 Johns. Ch. 619 · New York Court of Chancery · Dec 7, 1820

The plaintiffs sue as assignees of Kellogg if Sprague, who were simple contract creditors of Brown if Fay. … F. is admitted to be insolvent, and the bill is against the administrators and infant heirs of 'Brown; it calls upon the former to discover and account for the personal estate, and of Brown’s share of the stock in trade belonging

Brown v. Bradshaw

126 Ohio St. 3d 265 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2010

[Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw, 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.] BROWN, APPELLANT, v. BRADSHAW, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw, 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.] … See Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 1200, ¶ 7-9; State v.