Case law

Triax Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,869 · United States Court of Claims · May 25, 1990

Drake Co. v. … Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 417 (2d Cir.1961).

In re Battelle Memorial Institute

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 405 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 24, 1951

— and this for the reasons set out in the decision of the board of tax appeals in the case of Zindorf v. … In the' case of Wehrle Foundation v.

United States v. Sussfeld

1 Ct. Cust. 51 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 28, 1910

(See also American Mutoscope & Biograph Co. v. Edison Mfg. Co., 137 Fed. Rep., 262; Edison v. American Mutoscope Co., 114 Fed. Rep., 926; and Edison v. American Mutoscope & Biograph Co., 151 Fed. Rep., 767.) … See Hartranft v. Wiegmann ( 121 U. S., 609 ); Swan & Finch Co. v. United States ( 190 U. S., 143 ); and Eidman v. Martinez ( 184 U. S., 583 ).

Downing & Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 310 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 9, 1922

The protest was submitted to the board and was overruled. … A. 4529; Mariott v. Brune ( 9 How. 619 ); United States v. Southmayd (9 id. 637 ); Austin v. Peaslee ( 2 Fed. Cas. 235 ); *314 Weaver v. Saltonstall ( 38 Fed. 493 ); Fachri v. Magone (53 id. 789); In re McRath, T.

James Edgar Motto v. The United States

348 F.2d 523 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

V). … Shapiro v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 205 , 107 Ct.Cl. 650 (1947); Boruski v. United States, 155 F.Supp. 320 , 140 Ct.Cl. 1 (1957); Egan v. United States, 158 F.Supp. 377 , 141 Ct.Cl. 1 (1958); Clackum v.

Stencel v. Nordine

481 F.2d 916 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 2, 1973

See Koval v. Bodenschatz, 463 F.2d 442, 447 , 59 CCPA-,- (1972). … Koval v. Bodenschatz, supra. The totality of testing must be considered to ascertain whether or not the standards have been met. See Voisinet v. Coglianese, 455 F.2d 1064, 1068 , 59 CCPA -.,- (1972).

Demo v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 349 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 15, 1983

The plaintiff’s alleged cause of action accrued at the time of his discharge (Mathis v. … United States, 214 Ct.Cl. 383, 386 , 556 F.2d 1104, 1106 (1977)); and adverse actions by the administrative boards on the plaintiff’s requests for relief did not create a new cause of action (Friedman v.

O‑F‑A‑S‑

Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 14, 2020

See, e.g., Garcia v. Holder, 756 F.3d 885, 891 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783, 808–09 (11th Cir. 2010); Ramirez-Peyro v. Holder, 574 F.3d 893, 900 (8th Cir. 2009); see also Ali v. … Bragdon v.

Hauss v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 755 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 22, 1928

The petitioner then duly filed her petition with this Board attacking this determination. … The Court of Claims in Dodge and Bloomer, Administrators, v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 178, and the United States District Court, Eastern District Michigan, in Kales v.

Burroughs Corp. v. Commissioner

33 T.C. 389 · United States Tax Court · Nov 30, 1959

Burroughs Corporation, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Burroughs Corp. v. Commissioner Docket No. 72023 United States Tax Court 33 T.C. 389 ; 1959 U.S. Tax Ct. … Guggenheim, supra [ 288 U.S. 280 ], or to modify the terms of the arrangement so as to make other disposition of the property, Sanford v.

Wood v. Commissioner

6 T.C. 930 · United States Tax Court · Apr 30, 1946

Fisher v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 2d Cir., 1932), 59 Fed. (2d) 192; Bass v. Hawley (C. C. A., 5th Cir., 1933), 62 Fed. (2d) 721; Noel v. Parrott (C. C. A., 4th Cir., 1926), 15 Fed. (2d) 669; certiorari denied, 273 U. … S. 754 ; and Schumacher v. United States (1932), 74 Ct. Cls. 720; 55 Fed. (2d) 1007.

PRZYGOCKI

17 I. & N. Dec. 361 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

See Matter of V—I—, 3 I&N Dec. 571, 573 (BIA 1949); Matter of L—, 2 I&N Dec. 486 (BIA 1946; A.G. 1946). … See, generally, Fulgencio v. INS, 573 F.2d 596 (9 Cir. 1978) (involving "conditional" grants of adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act).

D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United States

413 F.2d 1147 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

However, none of this evidence was presented to the Board of Contract Appeals. In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. … In Zoda v.

Spray Cotton Mills v. Secretary of War

9 T.C. 824 · United States Tax Court · Oct 29, 1947

S. 484, 498 ; Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co., 285 U. S. 1, 16 ; United States v. Mo. Pac. R. Co., supra; Iselin v. United States, 270 U. S. 245 , except to the extent that it is supported by valid reasons. Burnet v. … Linn Timber Go. v. United States, U. S. 574, 578, and cases cited; Isaacks v. Jeffers, 144 Fed. (2d) 26; certiorari denied, 323 U. S. 781 ; United States v. Spreckels, 50 Fed. Supp. 789; Westminster National Bank v.

In re Allen Electric & Equipment Co.

458 F.2d 1404 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1972

In re Dirzius, 50 CCPA 836, 311 F. 2d 825 , 136 USPQ 198 (1963); Bristol-Myers Co. v. Pharmaco, Inc., 48 CCPA 1107, 291 F. 2d 756 , 130 USPQ 220 (1961); General Shoe Corp. v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. … The board’s decision is therefore affirmed. Abstracted at 163 USPQ 293 (1969). Both tlie examiner and tlie board pointed out that “SCANNING ANTENNA” is defined in J.

In re Rubinfield

270 F.2d 391 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1959

See Grant v. Raymond, 6 Peters 218 . As was said in Ashley v. … Gorham Company v. White, 81 U.S. 511 ; In re Schraubstadter, 26 App.

P

9 I. & N. Dec. 293 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1961

The Board of Immigration Appeals has concluded that the time of first imposing judgment occurred in March 1959, holding that under the rule in United States eir. rel. Piperkoff v. … People v. McCullough, 300 N.Y. 107, 89 N.E.2d 385 (1948) ; Bojinoff v. Pantile., 299 N.Y. 145. 85 N.E.2d 909 (1949).

International Telephone & Telegraph v. United States

453 F.2d 1283 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1972

Cf., Dynamics Corporation of America v. United States, 182 Ct. Cl. 62 (1968). … The Board sustained the 'defendant on this point, citing Lowell O. West Lumber Sales v. United States, 270 F. 2d 12 (9th Cir. 1959). We do not think that case is apposite.

08-20 323

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). However, according to VA standards, impaired hearing must be of a certain level to be considered a disability. … See Degmetich v. Brown, 8 Vet.

Daniels v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2022

Christian v. United States, 337 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (quoting Hary v. United States, 618 F.2d 704, 707 (Ct. Cl.1980)); Rogers v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 757, 768 (2016); see also Driscoll v. … V.