Case law

Emery v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 303 · United States Customs Court · Jun 11, 1952

or planks were put together, and that tongues and grooves were put on the ends of some of the boards or planks as well as on the edges. … The distinction is perhaps best demonstrated when the situation which obtained in the case of Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United States, 16 Cust. Ct. 134 , C.

Roflan Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,207 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1985

Kaminer Construction Corporation v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 182, 191 , 488 F.2d 980, 984 (1973); BCM Corporation v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 602, 605 (1983). … Sundstrand Turbo v. United States, 182 Ct.Cl. at 60, 389 F.2d at 423 , citing to Jefferson Construction Co. of Florida v.

In re Anhaltzer

48 F.2d 657 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 15, 1931

The petition for rehearing was denied by the Board of Appeals. … Stern et al. v. Schroeder et al., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 670, 36 F. (2d) 515; Stern et al. v. Schroeder et al., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 690, 36 F. (2d) 518; Beidler v. Caps, 17 C. C. P. A.

Spehr v. United States

51 Fed. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2001

See Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 318 (1991); Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 920 (Fed.Cir.1990). … Hamon v.

In re ATV Network Ltd.

552 F.2d 925 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1977

KASHIWA, Judge. 1 This is an appeal by ATV Network Limited from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) affirming the examiner’s refusal to register its mark. We reverse. … While we appreciate that this is necessarily a subjective conclusion, we note our earlier opinion in a strikingly similar case, viz., Alpha Corp. v.

Hoffman v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

It is clear that he could only receive this appointment after an examination by the board, a favorable recommendation to the President, and action by the latter on the report. … See CronIN v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 20 , and Guilmette v. United States, 49 C. Cls. 188 .

Fulton v. United States

47 Fed. Cl. 503 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2000

See Crager v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 400, 406 (1992) (citations omitted). … See Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998).

Schussler v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2021

See Stein v. United States, 121 Fed. Cl. 248, 266 (2015). In Murphy v. … Accordingly, no basis exists for this Court to overturn the decision of the Board. Haskins v. United States, 51 Fed.

American Electric Contracting Corp. v. United States

579 F.2d 602 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556-59 (1941); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, n. 579 (1968); MacRae v. Commissioner, 294 F.2d 56, 59 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 955 (1962); and see 3 K. … In Rough Diamond Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.

Surgical Supply Importing Co. v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 112 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 26, 1912

See Stern v. United States (123 Fed. Rep., 192), United States v. Bernhard (150 Fed. Rep., 375). … If a review was desired by the Government of the action of the board on this question, an appeal should have been taken on its behalf. United States v. Lies ( 170 U. S., 628 ).

Collins v. United States

47 Fed. Cl. 196 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2000

See Bonen v. … The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals stated in Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1557, 1560 (Fed.Cir.1990) (citing Friedman v.

Ishida v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 415 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1923

D. 36870 (Mitsui & Co. et al. v. United States, 7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 307 ). 9. … See United States v. Oberle ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 527 ; T. D. 31545); United States v. Quong (5 id. 198; T. D. 34326); United States v. Jaehne (8 id. 307; T. D. 37585).

Buono v. Commissioner

74 T.C. 187 · United States Tax Court · Apr 29, 1980

As we held in Howell v. … See, e.g., Malat v.

N-N-B

29 I. & N. Dec. 79 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Apr 17, 2025

See Mekhoukh v. … Anderson v.

Application of Luke Thorington, Gerald Schiazzano and Joel Shurgan

418 F.2d 528 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 26, 1969

Appellants rely principally on language in the case of Gross v. … Gross v. Norris, 26 F.2d 898 (4th Cir. 1928). . The conflicting theories and cases on this point are analyzed in a thorough review by Megley, Design and Mechanical Patents Relating to the Same Subject Matter, J. Pat.

Gaines v. United States

158 Ct. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

See also Post v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 94 ; Tabbutt v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 495 ; Gray v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 312 . … See, e.g., Farley v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 776 ; Anderson v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 365 ; Parks v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 415 .

In re Cramblet

62 F.2d 358 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 27, 1932

The Board of Appeals, as has been said, rests its rejection of these claims upon the Mailey patent. … Hillard, v. Fisher, etc., 159 Fed. 439 . See, also, Topliff v. Topliff, 145 U. S. 156 ; Atlantic G. & P. Co. v. Wood, 288 Fed. 148 ; Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co., 214 Fed. 368 ; Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Prod.

Workingmen's Overall Supply Co. v. Glander

58 Ohio Law. Abs. 385 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 4, 1950

The Board feels that it is supported in its view by what is found in Schumacher Stone Co. v. Tax Commission, 134 Oh St 529, 13 O. O. 161, and Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company v. Glander, 145 Oh St 423, 31 O. O. 39. … The Tax Commissioner, therefore, did -not arbitrarily disregard the statutes enumerated, ,v ¡ *391 Regarding the claim that its used garments and towels have no inventory value, the Board of Tax Appeals is emphatically of

United States v. Tiffany & Co.

10 Ct. Cust. 247 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 21, 1920

The protest was sustained by the Board of General Appraisers, and an order was issued by the board to the collector directing him "to reliquidate on the number of lire mentioned in the entry at the value certified to by the … The cases cited by the board-Cramer v. Arthur ( 102 U. S., 612 ); Hadden v. Merritt ( 115 U. S., 25 ); and United States v. Klingenberg ( 153 U.

13-35 400

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 17, 2018

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See Parker v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 116 (1994); Harris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 180, 183 (1991).