Case law

Bill Rivers Trailers, Inc. v. Thermo King Corp.

478 F.2d 1243 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 24, 1973

See AMF, Inc. v. American Leisure Products, Inc., 474 F.2d 1403 (CCPA 1973) and cases cited therein. Furthermore, we cannot agree with Í» appellant’s assertions regarding the portion of the trademark. … See Mead Johnson & Co. v. American Home Products Corp., 461 F.2d 1381 , 59 CCPA 1082 (1972) and Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. M. Landaw Ltd., 474 F.2d 1402 (CCPA 1973).

Iron Balls International Ltd. v. Bull Creek Brewing, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 4, 2024

This Section “gives the Board the equitable power to, inter alia, restrict the goods or services identified in an application or registration.” Embarcadero Techs., Inc. v. … Lukens Inc. v.

In re Kluter

92 F.2d 906 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 6, 1937

Tbe board cited one more reference, McClevey, 1,396,515, of November 8,1921. … (Patents) 1114, 47 F. (2d) 970, we quoted from the leading case on this question, Potts v. Creager, 155 U.

Public Warehousing Company K.S.C.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 10, 2014

Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. United States, 820 F.2d 1198, 1202 (Fed. Cir. 1987); Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 628 F.2d 1368, 1375 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 993 (1980). … Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 487 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 (1963); United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 12 n.27 (1970).

Boeing v. Commissioner

1 T.C. 669 · United States Tax Court · Feb 25, 1943

The court, following Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U. S. 552 , and Helvering v. Richter, 312 U. … See Commissioner v. Boeing 123 Fed. (2d) 86.

Liberty Agency Co. v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 778 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 14, 1926

Liberty Agency Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6257. United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 778 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2777 ; December 14, 1926 , Promulgated *2777 1. … Maurice Brown 10 10 do None. J. M.

Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt

39 Ohio Law. Abs. 243 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 19, 1943

See American Steel & Wire Company v. Speed, 192 U. S. 500 , 48 L. Ed. 538 . Brown v. Houston, 114 U S. 622, 29 L. Ed. 257 . In the latter case the first syllabus is as follows: “1. … BOARD OF TAX APPEALS.

Tel-Electric Co. v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 434 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1925

In this case the Board clearly has jurisdiction to consider the deficiency in tax found by the Commissioner for the years 1918 and 1919. … Taxpayer relies upon the decision of the Court of Claims in the case of the Brilliant Coal Company v. United States, 59 Ct.

Application of Arthur L. Reese

359 F.2d 462 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 21, 1966

It relates only to the time for a request or petition to the Board of Appeals for a rehearing or reconsideration or modification of its decision by it, not by us. … Eckey v. Watson, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 16 , 268 F.2d 891 . The question of the applicability of that rule not being before us, however, we express no views regarding appellant’s rights should he rely on Rule 183.

180806-203

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2020

In determining whether service connection is warranted, the Board shall consider the benefit-of-the-doubt doctrine. 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102; Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996); Gilbert v. … Kellar v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 157, 161 (1994).

Burns v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 758 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1990

Disability compensation claims do not accrue until the appropriate board either finally denies such a claim or refuses to hear it. Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1557, 1560 (Fed.Cir. 1990), citing Friedman v. … Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 422, 445 , 627 F.2d 1068 (1980); Bellamy v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 720, 723 (1985); see Alabama Hospital Ass’n. v.

In re Phillips

608 F.2d 879 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 15, 1979

The Supreme Court of the United States in Gottschalk v. … On reconsideration, the board reviewed its decision in light of Parker v.

OSC Solutions, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 17, 2023

N00189-20-A-0002 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Frank V. Reilly, Esq. Oakland Park, FL APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. … Sys., Inc. v. United States, 778 F.3d 1000, 1004 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “The facts supporting jurisdiction are subject to our fact-finding upon a review of the record.”

Law v. United States

195 Ct. Cl. 370 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1971

McGraw & Co. v. United States, supra. … A Government board of contract appeals is “not precluded from deciding a claim on a theory not advanced by the parties.” L. B. Samford, Inc. v. United States, 187 Ct.

GSC Construction, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 11, 2015

Such certification is a prerequisite for Board jurisdiction. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Garrett, 6 F.3d 1547, 1552-53 (Fed. … Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59401, Appeal of GSC Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

In re Cincinnati Masonic Temple Co.

57 Ohio Law. Abs. 545 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 23, 1950

The tax commissioner’s motion to dismiss this application for lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Board of Tax Appeals is founded on the cases of Pfeiffer v. Jenkins, 141 Oh St, 66, and McFadden v. … (Pfeiffer et al., Trustees of Akron Public Library v. Jenkins *548 et al., Board of Tax Appeals, 141 Oh St, 66, approved and followed.)

Petry Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 525 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1923

In United States v. Olivotti & Co. ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 46 ; T. … See Lazarus v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 508, 509 ; T. D. 32247); United States v. Downing ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 545 ; T.

R-G

8 I. & N. Dec. 128 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1958

(Accord, Matter of V--, 56096/451, 1 I. & N. Dec. 293; distinguished, Matter of V—, A 8613142, 7 I. & N. Dec. 565. … The factor which distinguishes Matter of V — , 7 I. & N.

Questions Arising During Vacancy of Chairmanship of Federal Home Loan Bank Board

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Jul 9, 1979

in the shaping of Board policies. … We suspect that in the absence of specific statutory language to the contrary, a Govern­ ment entity such as the Federal Home Loan Bank Board may rely on the common law rule. C f, FTC v.

Engineered Timber Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner

74 T.C. 808 · United States Tax Court · Jul 22, 1980

In Jones v. … Holding in Aero Rental v.