Case law

Berzoff v. United States

137 Ct. Cl. 817 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

Whitaker, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: As in Capps v. United States, 133 C. … In the Capps case and also in Loeb v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 937 , we held plaintiff was entitled to retired pay from the date of his discharge.

In re Hawkins

486 F.2d 569 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 23, 1973

In General Electric Co. v. … The point made by the board was that many of the substituents encompassed by the language complained of would “interfere with the attainment of the suggested utility * * Appellant points to no error in the board’s reasoning

Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co. of Manila

21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 84,079 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1975

agreement in excess of $50,000 without approval of the Settlement Review Board. … We determine that the Board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. This being a Wunderlich Act case, such findings are not to be disturbed. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, 204 Ct.

08-31 010

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

Caffery v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1995); see also VAOPGCPREC 11-95 (1995). Given the foregoing, a new examination should be scheduled to evaluate the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected PTSD. … See Palczewski v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 174, 181-82 (2007); Snuffer v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 400, 403 (1997).

Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States

8 Cust. Ct. 51 · United States Customs Court · Jan 9, 1942

In the case of United States v. Brown, 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 212 , T. D. 34380, the merchandise consisted of whole sheepskins which had been split, tanned, and dressed and then subjected to a process known as dicing. … Would you regard it as ornamented board? — A. No. Q. As embossed board? — A. No. Q. Printed board? — A. No.

Olympia Veneer Co. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 892 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1931

Dry Goods Co. v. United States, and White v. Hood Rubber Co., 280 U. S. 453 . … The case of White v.

Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co. v. Commissioner

30 T.C. 398 · United States Tax Court · May 29, 1958

The pulp is brown in color, but more extensive cookifig makes it easier to bleach. Unbleached sulphate pulp is used for making paper in which strength is the prime consideration and the brown color is not objectionable. … Suitable pulpwoods for producing the former were more abundant and cheaper in this country, and for the commoner forms of brown paper and board, in which sulphate pulp is used, there are greater advantages in the integration

AAA Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2012

RCFC 12(h)(3); see also Tindle v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 337, 341 (2003). The United States Court of Federal Claims “is a court of limited jurisdiction.” Fullard, 78 Fed.Cl. at 299 (citing Brown v. … Pikulin v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 71, 75 (2011); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Bivens actions ... lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.”).

Stone v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 250 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1984

United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 345, 347 (1983); Adkins v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 909, 912-13 (1981); Quirk v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 780, 782 (1981); McGahey v. … Adkins v. United States, supra, 228 Ct.Cl. at 911 (citing Deering v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. at 351 n. 3, 620 F.2d at 246 n. 3); Plant v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 682, 684 (1980); Frommhagen v.

Ivary v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 663 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 18, 1983

Schuster v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 708, 710 (1983) (Wood, J.), aff’d, 723 F.2d 69 (Fed.Cir.1983); Cemer v. Marathon Oil Co., 583 F.2d 830, 831-32 (6th Cir.1978); Mathis v. … Plaintiff’s resort to the Correction Board is a permissive remedy and does not create a new cause of action. Ray v. United States, 538 F.2d 347 , 209 Ct.Cl. 761 , 766 (1976); Friedman v.

In re Society of the Precious Blood

48 Ohio Law. Abs. 214 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 20, 1947

Gerke, Treasurer v Purcell, 25 Oh St 229; Watterson v Halliday, 77 Oh St 150; Treasurer v Evatt, 140 Oh St 185, 189. … by the case of Bloch et al. v Board of Tax Appeals, 144 Oh St 414, where the Court held: “A school organized and operated by a religious denomination for the sole purpose of training men to assume ministerial positions in

Moisseiff v. Commissioner

21 B.T.A. 515 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 2, 1930

Co. v. Rahn, 132 U. … In Railroad Co. v. Hanning, 82 U.

Compagnie Gervais Danone v. Precision Formulations, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 5, 2009

EZ Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. … See also Osage Oil & Transportation, Inc. v.

CHAPLAIN SERVICES

21 I. & N. Dec. 578 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996

BEFORE: Board En Banc: SCHMIDT, Chairman; DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA, HEILMAN, HOLMES, HURWITZ, VILLAGELIU, FILPPU, COLE, ROSENBERG, MATHON, and GUENDELSBERGER, Board Members. … V. CONCLUSION Because the applicant has not demonstrated that it satisfies the require- ments for recognition as stated in 8 C.F.R. § 292.2(a), the application will be disapproved.

United States v. Waterhouse

1 Ct. Cust. 353 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911

Prior to the Ranlett case the principle of segregation therein enunciated seems to have been recognized both by the board and the courts. See United States v. Brewer (92 Fed. Rep., 343); Weil v. United States (115 Fed. … Rep., 592); United States v. Helmrath (135 Fed. Rep., 912); United States. v Myers (140 Fed. Rep., 648). The case of the United States v.

Bes design/build, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2022

Co. v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 245, 247 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Joseph Morton Co. v. United States, 757 F.2d 1273, 1280 (Fed. … and filed its formal complaint, BES Design/Build, LLC v.

Niles v. Commissioner

20 B.T.A. 949 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 24, 1930

See also Board of Education v. Bakewell, 122 Ill. 339 ; 10 N. E. 378 . In the case of Inhabitants of Orono v. … Board of Education v. Bakewell, supra.

VELASQUEZ

25 I. & N. Dec. 278 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

Dent, Appellate Counsel; Karen Donoso Stevens, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: GRANT and MILLER, Board Members. Concurring Opinion: MALPHRUS, Board Member, joined by MILLER, Board Member. … Malphrus, Board Member, in which Neil P. Miller, Board Member, joined I fully concur with the reasoning and the result in this case, which is controlled by Johnson v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 1265 (2010).

Associated Industries v. Commissioner

7 T.C. 1449 · United States Tax Court · Dec 31, 1946

See also Commissioner v. … We, therefore, believe that petitioner is an organization of the same general class as a chamber of commerce or board of trade. Cf. Retailers Credit Assn. v. Commissioner and Crooks v.

190301-5360

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2019

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … MARISSA CAYLOR Acting Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board J. L. Burroughs, Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.