Case law

In re Dybel

524 F.2d 1393 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 6, 1975

The board cited the following cases in support of its position that a bona fide experimental use involves no commercial exploitation: Pickering v. Holman, 459 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir. 1972); Robbins Co. v. Lawrence Mfg. … Co., supra; Link-Belt Co. v. International Rectifier Corp., 176 USPQ 381 (C.D.Cal.1973); Drackett Co. v. Davis, 176 USPQ 344 (E.D.Mich.1972). See also Dart Indus., Inc. v. E.

Sullivan v. United States

177 Ct. Cl. 518 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1966

In the recent case of Middleton v. United States, 170 Ct. … This court, citing Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct.

08-31 617

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

See Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 253 (1999); see also Degmetich v. Brown, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Brammer v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 223 (1992). … See Jones v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 137 (1994); Espiritu v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 492 (1992). As such, the Board finds that the VA opinion is more probative than the Veteran's assertions.

White v. Bowles

150 F.2d 408 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1945

In Bowles v. … Rabkin v. Bowles, Em.App., 1944, 143 F.2d 600 ; Wylie v. Bowles, Em.App., 1945, 147 F.2d 143 ; Sirianni v. Bowles, Em.App., 1945, 148 F.2d 343 .

Handicapped Children

14 Pa. D. & C.2d 475 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 16, 1958

V. … V.

Blum v. United States

227 Ct. Cl. 555 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1981

Ruderer v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 456, 468 , 412 F.2d 1285, 1292 (1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 914 (1970). … error. 4 Nor do we think that United States v.

190627-13369

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2019

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … SENYK Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board J. Bayles, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Frankel v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 23 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 17, 1990

NEBEKER, Chief Judge: Appellant, Cleda V. Frankel, applied for death pension benefits as the surviving spouse of the veteran David Frankel. … City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564 , 105 S.Ct. 1504 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985); Danville Plywood Corp. v.

Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of Transportation

484 F.2d 1385 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 13, 1973

Nevertheless, despite the misconstruction by the board of the contract provision, we affirm the board’s decision granting the petition to cancel the trademark. … In our view the documents of record and testimony of witnesses support the board’s conclusion that V-Ring was used by both FAA and Scanwell to describe the antenna array.

Hoppock v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1147 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

See Bevins v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 547 (1964) ; Smith v. United States 168 Ct. Cl. 545 (1964). … citing Friedman v.

S. & M. Plumbing Co. v. Commissioner

55 T.C. 702 · United States Tax Court · Feb 1, 1971

See also Fishback v. United States, 215 F. Supp. 621, 625 (D. S.D. 1963). … Fishback v. United States, supra at 625 .

Allison

546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1976

Upon- consideration thereof, the court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown *333 v.

McCann v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 286 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1987

Busby School v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 588, 595 (1985) (citing Little River Lumber Co. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 492, 494 (1985); Patterson v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 932, 934 (1982)). … As our predecessor court said in Clark v.

Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. The United States

416 F.2d 1306 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1969

Seaford Court Estates Ld. v. Asher, [1949] 2 K.B. 481, 498-499. Public Law 87-653 was intended to apply to situations where the data supplied was incomplete, inaccurate, or noncurrent. … affirming the Board.

Hall v. Shimadzu

59 F.2d 225 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1932

In this contention appellant relies upon our decision in the case of Braren v. Horner, 47 F.(2d) 358, 364 , 18 C. C. P. … In the case of Schram Glass Co. v. Homer Brooke Glass Co. (C. C.

12-24 706

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

. §§ 4.40 , 4.45, 4.59 (2015); see also Deluca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 206 (1995); Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32, 33 (2011). … . §§ 4.40 , 4.45, 4.59 (2015); see also Deluca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 206 (1995); Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32, 33 (2011).

SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,647 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1989

Schwabenbauer v. Board of Educ., 667 F.2d 305 , 313-14 (2d Cir.1981). Mere denials or conclusory statements, however, are not sufficient to create an evidentiary conflict. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. … Neal & Co., Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 282, 287 (1987); see also Golder v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 513, 517 (1988); State of Illinois v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 399, 408 (1988); Bass v.

Meyer v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2026

If a board’s decision “lacks any coherence,” it is entitled to no judicial deference. Coburn v. McHugh, 679 F.3d 924, 934 (D.C. … Boards of correction may make “a disability determination in the first instance” when a PEB is not convened. Ford v. United States, 172 Fed. Cl. 300, 311 (2024) (quoting Sawyer v.

Nibley-Mimnaugh Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1935

That court remanded the proceeding on May 7, 1934, Commissioner v. … In accordance with the court’s mandate directing that the decision of the Board be reinstated, if the Board finds that petitioner was on an' accrual basis, Judgment will be entered of “Deficiency or overpayment, none; and

Walter M. Brown v. Office of Personnel Management

Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 30, 2016

Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, MSPB Docket No. DA-844E-15-0398-I-1, Initial Appeal File (IAF), Tab 1. … . ¶3 On March 14, 2016, the appellant filed a petition for enforcement of the Board’s final decision seeking damages of “3 x 1,000,000,000 for everyday past the decision of the judgment.” Brown v.