Case law

M/V "SOUTH AFRICAN VICTORY"

12 I. & N. Dec. 253 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1967

I nterim Decision #1740 Aavaa Or M/V "Sorrm Aramaic Vicroxr" In Fine Proceedings NOL-10/61.284 Decided by Board February 13, … D'Amato v.

Application of Bigelow

194 F.2d 545 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 14, 1952

Company v. … For the reasons stated the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 .

ALYAZJI

25 I. & N. Dec. 397 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2011

Lazarus, Appellate Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, PAULEY, and WENDTLAND, Board Members. … Aremu v.

In re ATV Network Ltd.

552 F.2d 925 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1977

KASHIWA, Judge. 1 This is an appeal by ATV Network Limited from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) affirming the examiner’s refusal to register its mark. We reverse. … While we appreciate that this is necessarily a subjective conclusion, we note our earlier opinion in a strikingly similar case, viz., Alpha Corp. v.

Sack v. Commissioner

36 B.T.A. 595 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 5, 1937

, Petitioner, v. … ; and, therefore, that the Board has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Teresa L. Ruckman v. Department of the Navy

Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2025

See Clemens v. … Brown v. Department of the Interior, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 18 (2014), overruled on other grounds by Haas, 2022 MSPB 36; see Douglas v.

Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. Treves

241 F.2d 718 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1957

Walker on Patents, § 141a; Hunter v. Strikeman, 13 App.D.C. 214, 226 ; Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App.D.C. 86, 92 ; Linde-meyr v. Hoffman, 18 App.D.C. 1, 5 ; Roe v. Hanson, 19 App.D.C. 559, 564 .” … Kyrides v. Bruson, 102 F.2d 416 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 986; Chittick v. Lyons, 104 F.2d 818 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1382; Muskat v. Schmelkes, 140 F.2d 984 , 31 C.C.P.A., Patents, 837; Kvalnes v.

Anthony v. Commissioner

66 T.C. 367 · United States Tax Court · May 27, 1976

Speaking of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals, the Supreme Court explained in Old Colony Tr. Co. v. … Both the House Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committees indicated that “Under the new appellate procedure from the board * * * the jurisdiction of the board in tax matters is similar to that heretofore held by the

GSC Construction, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 24, 2020

Co. v. United States, 64 Fed. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Sec’y of the Army, 973 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed.

Hartman v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 623 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 24, 1992

Because the Board’s decision addresses and decides the question of causation, the Court finds remand for readjudication of the claim unnecessary. See Contreras v. … Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 275 (1992) (order denying Secretary’s motion for remand where the Board’s decision addressed and decided the question of causation); cf . Davis v.

Nibali v. United States

634 F.2d 494 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1980

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 (1974); Thorpe v. Housing Authority of City of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969); and United States v. Schooner Peggy, 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 103 (1801). … Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 265-68 (1975); Aparacor, Inc. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 596 , 571 F.2d 552 (1978); Polos v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 547 , 621 F.2d 385 (1980); Tucker v. United States, 224 Ct.

David O. Rassenfoss v. Department of the Treasury

2014 MSPB 68 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 22, 2014

See, e.g., Beck v. … McKinney v.

Smith & Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 121 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 26, 1921

In the analogous case of Goodenough Horse-Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Rhode Island Horse-Shoe Co. ( 154 U. … To the same effect was the ruling of this court in the case oFougera & Co. v. United States ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 284, 286 ; T.

United States v. Tiffany & Co.

10 Ct. Cust. 247 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 21, 1920

The protest was sustained by the Board of General Appraisers, and an order was issued by the board to the collector directing him "to reliquidate on the number of lire mentioned in the entry at the value certified to by the … The cases cited by the board-Cramer v. Arthur ( 102 U. S., 612 ); Hadden v. Merritt ( 115 U. S., 25 ); and United States v. Klingenberg ( 153 U.

Abbott v. United States

151 F. Supp. 929 · United States Court of Claims · May 8, 1957

We held in Poggas v. United States, 118 C. … S. v. Townsley, 323 U.

09-49 945

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 29, 2015

See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 39 (1993). The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ). VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. … The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999).

Cislak v. Wagner

215 F.2d 275 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 15, 1954

See Sloan v. … In the light of the facts herein appearing, the position taken by the board finds support in previous rulings of the court. See Land v. Dreyer, 155 F.2d 383 , 33 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1108, and Field v.

12-32 823

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 9, 2015

App. 165, 178 (2001) (en banc) (observing that "the VCAA is a reason to remand many, many claims, but it is not an excuse to remand all claims."); Reyes v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 113, 116 (1994); Soyini v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. … Sandoval v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 7, 9 (1994); citing Aguilar v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 21, 23 (1991).

190420-8043

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 26, 2019

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … JEBBY RASPUTNIS Acting Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board W. Wells, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Grasselli v. Dewing

534 F.2d 306 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 6, 1976

as a whole, citing Patterson v. … As we recognized in Young v.