Case law

Bonneville Associates v. United States

39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,596 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1993

In Triton Group, Ltd. v. … Co., Inc. v.

In re Mavrogenis

57 F.2d 361 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 4, 1932

C. 428; Moore v. Heany, 34 App. D. C. 31, 39, and in Mattullath's Case, 38 App. D. C. 497. … Eevival of an application was considered by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in Fehete v. Robertson, 57 App. D. C. 73, 17 F. (2d 335, and in Martin v. Robertson, 59 App. D. C. 270, 39 F. (2d) 520.

Polos v. United States

621 F.2d 385 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1980

In Carey v. … See also Hernandez del Valle v. Santa Aponte, 575 F.2d 321, 324 (1st Cir. 1978); Hostrop v. Board of Jr. College Dist. No. 515, 523 F.2d 569, 579 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, *558 425 U.S. 963 (1976); Giordano v.

Northbridge Electronics, Inc. v. United States

175 Ct. Cl. 426 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

See e.g., Universal Match Corporation v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 418, 422 (1968), and cases cited in fn. 4; Williston Contracts (3d ed.) § 623. See generally Fox Valley Engineering Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct. … Cl. 228, 239-40 (1960); Shepherd v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 724, 737 , 113 F. Supp. 648, 654 (1953); General Casualty Co. of America v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 520 , 533, 127 F.

Aluminum Co. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,310 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1983

Before the Board, however, plaintiff contended that under Deloro Smelting and Refining Co. v. … Click Co. v. United States, supra, it is concluded that, as defendant contends, the result reached by the Board is right.

Harold R. Miller v. Ronald R. House, and Yun Jen

353 F.2d 252 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 17, 1966

The board cited Paul v. Hess, 24 App.D.C. 462 , 1905 C.D. 610 and Bourn v. … See Bowers v. Valley, 149 F.2d 284 , 32 CCPA 1039; Knowles v. Tibbets, 347 F.2d 591 , 52 CCPA -.

Application of Bo Thuresson Af Ekenstam

256 F.2d 321 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1958

In Elizabeth v. … The decision principally relied on by the board and in the brief for the Commissioner is General Electric Co. v. Hy-grade Sylvania Corp., D.C., 61 F.Supp. 476 .

Bakers Franchise Corporation v. Royal Crown Cola Co.

404 F.2d 985 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 9, 1969

Suffice it to say that, although we are of the opinion that appellant’s prior pleading was properly admitted and considered by the board, we are also of the opinion that, even absent such an inference as the board may have … Bakers Franchise Corp. v. Marbert Products, Inc., opposition No. 43,665. 3 . Reg. No. 735,768, Aug. 7, 1962.

Application of George B. Karnofsky

390 F.2d 994 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 7, 1968

Based upon this record, which contains no factual basis for the board’s conclusions, we cannot find that the board has demonstrated how appellant’s specification fails to meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112 . … See also Autogiro Co. of America v. United States, 384 F.2d 391 (Ct.C1.1967).

Saul Bass & Associates v. United States

505 F.2d 1386 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

E.g., Banking & Trading Corp. v. Floete, 257 F. 2d 765 (2d Cir.1958) ; Byrne Organization, Inc. et al. v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 578, 585 , 287 F. 2d 582, 586 (1961) ; Abbell v. United States, 143 Ct. … Meigs, Inc., v. Empire Petroleum Co. 273 F. 2d 424 (7th Cir. 1960) with National Tea Co. v. Weiss, 341 F. 2d 331, 334 (7th Cir. 1965) and Oil Trading Associates, Inc. v. Texas Refining Inc. 303 F. 2d 713 (2d Cir. 1962).

F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States

69 Cust. Ct. 30 · United States Customs Court · Jul 27, 1972

Deringer, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 66 , C.D. 3530, 287 F. Supp. 1016 (1968). To quote from his opinion in that case: * * * in United States v. C. S. … So, too, in Landay Bros. v. United States, 5 Ct. Cust.

Ishimitsu Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 477 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 4, 1925

The Board of General Appraisers held it not to be a crude mineral, and that it was an unmanufactured article. *479 The Iwakami & Co. v. … . & Hall et als. v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls. 363 ; T.

10-29 468

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990); Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). … See Jensen v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1413, 1417 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Aircraft Radio Corporation v. Arc Sound Limited

440 F.2d 436 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 29, 1971

Hall Co. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 340 F.2d 960 , 52 CCPA 981 (1965). … Hall Co. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., supra; and Tac Technical Instrument Corp. v. Fischer and Porter Co., 433 F.2d 827 , 58 CCPA (1970).

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 606 · United States Customs Court · Feb 27, 1961

The appraiser found that this merchandise is a “board product” comprehended within the following specification: Board, Products Boards, wood pulp, including beer mat board (not plate-finisbed, super-calendered, friction calendered … Tower & Sons v. United States, 26 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 28, and finds it similar.

Ames Reliable Products Co. v. Commissioner

44 B.T.A. 176 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 10, 1941

The following is a copy of the minutes of a meeting of the board of directors of the petitioner held on December 1,1938: * ⅜ * * sfc ⅝ * At a meeting of tbe Board of Directors of the Ames Reliable Products Company held on … Commissioner v. Brooklyn Radio Service Corporation, 79 Fed. (2d) 833, reversing 31 B. T. A. 269. Cf. Commissioner v. Ox-Fibre Brush Co., 281 U. S. 115 . Decision will be entered whder Rule 50.

National City Bank v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 139 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 11, 1924

McGlauflin v. Holman, 1 Wash. St. 239, 24 Pac. 439 ; Schulte v. Schering, 2 Wash. St. 127, 26 Pac. 78 ; Schulte v. Littlejohn, 2 Wash. St. 129, 26 Pac. 79 ; Northcraft v. … The Board is therefore of ’ the opinion that it is not controlling in this case.

N-N-B

29 I. & N. Dec. 79 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Apr 17, 2025

See Mekhoukh v. … Anderson v.

GSC Construction, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 5, 2016

Taylor Construction Co. v. Barram, 203 F.3d 808, 811-12 (Fed. … Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59402, Appeal of GSC Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Spehr v. United States

51 Fed. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2001

See Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 318 (1991); Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 920 (Fed.Cir.1990). … Hamon v.