Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.59s

  • Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,587 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1983

    Christian & Associates v. United States, 160 Ct.Cl. 58 [ 320 F.2d 345 ] (1963). . 46 use §§ 1152(b), 1155. . House Report No. 91-1073, 91st Cong., 1st Sess. (May 12, 1970). . E.g., P-1, Contract No. … Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. U.S. Lines, Inc., 12 SRR 551, 598 (MSB 1971); See Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock v. Prudential — Grace Lines, 17 SRR 335, 385 (MSB 1977); Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2016

    Prior to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected.”); M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. … .”); Fisher v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 94-12 762

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

    See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 230 (1993). … App. at 426 (citing Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 95 (1996)). Neither the first nor second Thun element is satisfied here.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Estate of Boshell

    14 Ct. Cust. 273 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1922

    The Board of General Appraisers, now the United States Customs Court, sustained the protest on the authority of its decision rendered November 29, 1922, in Meadows, Wye & Co. v. United States, T. D. 39342, G. A. 8584. … Fabbri v. Murphy, 95 U. S. 191 ; Hartranft v. Oliver, 125 U. S. 525 ; United States v. Burr, 159 U. S. 78 ; United States v. Goodsell Co. 84 Fed. 439 ; Mosle v. Bidwell, 130 Fed. 334 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In re McKellin

    529 F.2d 1324 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1976

    Our analysis should not be confined to the board’s reasoning alone since we review the decision of the board on the stated ground of rejection and not merely its reasoning in support of that decision. Hunt v. … See Schnick v. Fenn, 277 F.2d 935 , 938 n. 2, 47 CCPA 1174, 1178 n. 3 (1960).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • David Crystal, Inc. v. Soo Valley Co.

    471 F.2d 1245 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 26, 1973

    This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 1 dismissing an opposition proceeding. … . § 1051 (a)(1), requires an applicant for registration to specify, inter alia, “the goods in connection with which the mark is used * * See also Trademark Rule 2.33(a) (1) (v) ; 4 Call-man, Unfair Competition, Trademarks

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Comprehensive Designers International, Ltd. v. Commissioner

    66 T.C. 348 · United States Tax Court · May 26, 1976

    Brown, 1 B.T.A. 446 (1925); Mead Cycle Co., 10 B.T.A. 887 , 896-897 (1928); Owens, The Foreign Tax Credit, sec. 7/3C (1961). Ravenscroft, Taxation and Foreign Currency, sec. 14/3.2C (1973). … See American Chicle Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 450, 453 (1942); Owens, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Green v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 320 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 1991

    HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge: This case concerns an appeal of a July 7, 1989, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying entitlement to service connection because appellant’s psychiatric disability, diagnosed … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United States

    73 Ct. Cl. 49 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

    Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United States, 191 U. S. 159 ; Ackerlind v. United States, 240 U. S. 531 . … v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sevgi Cook v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 16, 2022

    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Brown v. General Services Administration, No. 2021-1996, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2 (Fed. Cir. … Brown, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Orouba Agrifoods Processing Company v. United Food Import

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 28, 2010

    For claim preclusion purposes, the Board’s order is a final judgment on the merits. International Nutrition Co. v. Horphag Research, Ltd., 220 F.2d 1325, 55 USPQ2d 1492, 1494 (Fed. … Mayer/Berkshire Corp. v. Berkshire Fashions Inc., 424 F.3d 1229, 76 USPQ2d 1310, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (quoting Russell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 12-08 719

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

    See Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 222 (1995); Flash v. Brown, 8 Vet. … Wood v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • M/V "SOUTH AFRICAN VICTORY"

    12 I. & N. Dec. 253 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1967

    I nterim Decision #1740 Aavaa Or M/V "Sorrm Aramaic Vicroxr" In Fine Proceedings NOL-10/61.284 Decided by Board February 13, … D'Amato v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ALYAZJI

    25 I. & N. Dec. 397 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2011

    Lazarus, Appellate Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, PAULEY, and WENDTLAND, Board Members. … Aremu v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • In re ATV Network Ltd.

    552 F.2d 925 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1977

    KASHIWA, Judge. 1 This is an appeal by ATV Network Limited from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) affirming the examiner’s refusal to register its mark. We reverse. … While we appreciate that this is necessarily a subjective conclusion, we note our earlier opinion in a strikingly similar case, viz., Alpha Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sack v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 595 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 5, 1937

    , Petitioner, v. … ; and, therefore, that the Board has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Teresa L. Ruckman v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2025

    See Clemens v. … Brown v. Department of the Interior, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 18 (2014), overruled on other grounds by Haas, 2022 MSPB 36; see Douglas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anthony v. Commissioner

    66 T.C. 367 · United States Tax Court · May 27, 1976

    Speaking of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals, the Supreme Court explained in Old Colony Tr. Co. v. … Both the House Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committees indicated that “Under the new appellate procedure from the board * * * the jurisdiction of the board in tax matters is similar to that heretofore held by the

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Central Iron & Metal Co. v. Evatt

    39 Ohio Law. Abs. 69 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 19, 1943

    See Board of Education v. Budget Commission, 139 Oh. St., 313, 313; Miner v. Witt, 82 Oh. St., 237; Travis v. Public Utilities Commission, 123 Oh. St., 355. … Jur., §410, p. 1324; State ex Pulskamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Oh. St., 504.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • GSC Construction, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 24, 2020

    Co. v. United States, 64 Fed. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Sec’y of the Army, 973 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.