Case law

Judd v. Secretary of Nevada

816 F. Supp. 2d 1383 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Oct 7, 2011

David A. Andrews v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 22, 2021

On the one hand, the M21-1 is not binding on either the Board or this Court; we thus held in Overton v. … In Healev v.

Pratt v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 269 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 24, 1992

Just as in Goodman v. … The Court expects that the BVA will reexamine the evidence of record, seek any other evidence the Board feels is necessary, and issue a timely, well-supported decision in this case.” Fletcher v.

Jeffrey v. United States

127 Ct. Cl. 231 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

Jackson v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 405 ; Egan v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 460 . … Garcia v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 722 ; Gregory v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 794 . We see no procedural defect in the history of the plaintiff’s case. See O'Brien v. United States, 124 C. Cls. 655 .

Margolis v. Banner

599 F.2d 435 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1979

. § 102 (g), to the Board of Appeals. … See Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n, supra; Maryland v.

210109-129240

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 26, 2021

Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. As noted above, the AOJ found that the Veteran has been diagnosed with hypertension. The Board also notes that the Veteran is service connected for diabetes. … Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(b). Once VA undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a claim, the examination must be an adequate one. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.

Tele-Consultants, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 9, 2014

We held that, under Engage Learning, Inc. v. Salazar, 660 F.3d 1346, 1353-55 (Fed. … A Board Rule 30 dismissal is discretionary upon the Board. Gov't Technical Servs., LLC, ASBCA No. 57744, 13 BCA if 35,345.

Neumann

618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1979

the unlawful action amounted to arbitrary and capricious conduct on the part of the Correction Board. … Cason v. United States, supra, 200 Ct. Cl. at 431 , 471 F. 2d at 1229 ; Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 657 , 392 F. 2d 980 , cert. denied, 393 U. S. 843 (1968); Gersten v. United States, 176 Ct.

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 606 · United States Customs Court · Feb 27, 1961

The appraiser found that this merchandise is a “board product” comprehended within the following specification: Board, Products Boards, wood pulp, including beer mat board (not plate-finisbed, super-calendered, friction calendered … Tower & Sons v. United States, 26 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 28, and finds it similar.

BECKFORD

22 I. & N. Dec. 1216 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2000

Dissenting Opinions: SCHMIDT, Chairman; joined by VACCA, Board Member; ROSENBERG, Board Member. … See Henderson v.

190131-2127

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2019

Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 158 (1993). … See, e.g., Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 52 (1996); Meyer v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 425 (1996); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36 (1994).

AAA Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2012

RCFC 12(h)(3); see also Tindle v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 337, 341 (2003). The United States Court of Federal Claims “is a court of limited jurisdiction.” Fullard, 78 Fed.Cl. at 299 (citing Brown v. … Pikulin v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 71, 75 (2011); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Bivens actions ... lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.”).

KRONEGOLD

25 I. & N. Dec. 157 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009

Connolly, Appellate Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: HOLMES and HESS, Board Members; KENDALL CLARK, Temporary Board Member. … Id.; see also Matter of Truong, 24 I&N Dec. 52, 54 (BIA 2006); Matter of Ramos, 23 I&N Dec. 843, 845, 847-48 (BIA 2005); Matter of Gadda, 23 I&N Dec. 645, 648 (BIA 2003), aff’d, Gadda v.

Dan D. Diamond v. The United States

427 F.2d 1246 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970

Diamond v. … In Merson v.

190906-30597

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2020

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995) (en banc). … Bloom v. West, 12 Vet. App. 185, 187 (1999). Thus, a medical opinion is inadequate when it is unsupported by clinical evidence. Black v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 177, 180 (1995). See also Knightly v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Miller v. United States

19 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1884

(Mimmack v. The United States, 97 U. S., 426 .) … (Blake v. United States, 103 U. S., 237 .)

94-12 762

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 230 (1993). … App. at 426 (citing Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 95 (1996)). Neither the first nor second Thun element is satisfied here.

WALDEI

19 I. & N. Dec. 189 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1984

See Garcia v. Smith, 674 F.2d 838 (11th Cir. 1982). … See Garcia v. Smith, supra. We are aware that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Yiu Sing Chun v.

In re Anhaltzer

48 F.2d 657 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 15, 1931

The petition for rehearing was denied by the Board of Appeals. … Stern et al. v. Schroeder et al., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 670, 36 F. (2d) 515; Stern et al. v. Schroeder et al., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 690, 36 F. (2d) 518; Beidler v. Caps, 17 C. C. P. A.

Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2016

Prior to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected.”); M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. … .”); Fisher v.