Case law

13-22 123

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

See Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 93 (1996); Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405, 407-08 (1994); Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 121, 124 (1991). … Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993).

Smith v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 545 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

Board. … Examination showed a 36 percent enlargement of his heart, a marked disparity in the size and function of his kidneys (the right kidney was 6 cm. in length v. 13 cm. for the left kidney), and an impairment in both.

Klipstein v. United States

1 Ct. Cust. 122 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910

United States v. Wells (77 Fed. Rep., 411). … The cases of Swan v. Finch (113 Fed. Rep., 243) and Train v. United States (113 Fed. Rep., 1020), cited by the Government, are not in point. In Swan v.

Loewenthal v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 43 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 8, 1911

The Board of General Appraisers held the articles to be properly dutiable as trimmings under paragraph 390. … Rep., 477); Drew v. Grinnell ( 115 U. S., 477 ); and In re McGibbon, G. A. 6147 (T. D. 26692).

Leedy-Glover Realty & Insurance v. Commissioner

13 T.C. 95 · United States Tax Court · Jul 18, 1949

Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 292 U. S. 182 . In North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U. … United States v. Boston & Providence R. Corporation, 37 Fed. (2d) 670; Renwick v. United States, 87 Fed. (2d) 123; Commissioner v. Lyon, 97 Fed. (2d) 70. The petitioner cites Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 .

State Permits, Inc. v. Fieldvine, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 15, 2024

As the Board explained in Spiritline Cruises LLC v. Tour Management Servs. … LLC v.

08-35 171

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015

Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 253 (1999); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a). … See Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

In re Dybel

524 F.2d 1393 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 6, 1975

The board cited the following cases in support of its position that a bona fide experimental use involves no commercial exploitation: Pickering v. Holman, 459 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir. 1972); Robbins Co. v. Lawrence Mfg. … Co., supra; Link-Belt Co. v. International Rectifier Corp., 176 USPQ 381 (C.D.Cal.1973); Drackett Co. v. Davis, 176 USPQ 344 (E.D.Mich.1972). See also Dart Indus., Inc. v. E.

Lustig v. Legat

154 F.2d 680 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1946

In Bowers v. … See Payne v.

Bonneville Associates v. United States

39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,596 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1993

In Triton Group, Ltd. v. … Co., Inc. v.

In re Mavrogenis

57 F.2d 361 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 4, 1932

C. 428; Moore v. Heany, 34 App. D. C. 31, 39, and in Mattullath's Case, 38 App. D. C. 497. … Eevival of an application was considered by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in Fehete v. Robertson, 57 App. D. C. 73, 17 F. (2d 335, and in Martin v. Robertson, 59 App. D. C. 270, 39 F. (2d) 520.

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States

70 Fed. Cl. 114 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 10, 2006

See Abraham v. … See Spalding & Son, Inc. v.

Harold R. Miller v. Ronald R. House, and Yun Jen

353 F.2d 252 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 17, 1966

The board cited Paul v. Hess, 24 App.D.C. 462 , 1905 C.D. 610 and Bourn v. … See Bowers v. Valley, 149 F.2d 284 , 32 CCPA 1039; Knowles v. Tibbets, 347 F.2d 591 , 52 CCPA -.

Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United States

57 Fed. Cl. 676 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2003

On December 24, 1981, the Bank Board issued Resolution V-T-M-81-16, approving the merger of Home Federal and Second *682 Federal. … Holding Corp. v.

Bakers Franchise Corporation v. Royal Crown Cola Co.

404 F.2d 985 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 9, 1969

Suffice it to say that, although we are of the opinion that appellant’s prior pleading was properly admitted and considered by the board, we are also of the opinion that, even absent such an inference as the board may have … Bakers Franchise Corp. v. Marbert Products, Inc., opposition No. 43,665. 3 . Reg. No. 735,768, Aug. 7, 1962.

Hubert M. Biggs v. United States

287 F.2d 908 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1961

This is a suit by wage board employees •of the Department of the Navy to recover overtime pay. … United States, 121 Ct.Cl. 94, 98-99 ; Sirmon v. Cron & Gracey Drilling Corp., D.C., 44 F.Supp. 29, 31 ; Dollar v. Caddo River Lbr. Co., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 822 . Plaintiffs are not entitled to recover.

F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States

69 Cust. Ct. 30 · United States Customs Court · Jul 27, 1972

Deringer, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 66 , C.D. 3530, 287 F. Supp. 1016 (1968). To quote from his opinion in that case: * * * in United States v. C. S. … So, too, in Landay Bros. v. United States, 5 Ct. Cust.

10-29 468

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990); Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). … See Jensen v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1413, 1417 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Donald Kenneth Goodin v. Department of the Army

2016 MSPB 18 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 2, 2016

See Gingery v. … FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________ William D. Spencer Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C. 8

Hutter v. United States

170 Ct. Cl. 517 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

These are the set boundaries within which this court will review such Board action. Thompson v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 158 (1962). … The Correction Board was under no duty to defer to the conclusion reached by the Veterans Administration if there was substantial evidence before the Board to the contrary. John M. Kearney v. United States, 140 Ct.