Case law

Clinton Detergent Company v. The Procter & Gamble Company

302 F.2d 745 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1962

Societe Anonyme Marne Et Champagne v. Myers, 250 F.2d 374 , 45 CCPA 755. … United States Time Corp. v. Tennenbaum (Tennenbaum & Co., Telix Watch, Assignee, Substituted), 267 F.2d 327 , 46 CCPA 895.

Consolidated Molded Products Corp. v. United States

600 F.2d 793 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1979

See, for example, Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142 , 405 F.2d 554 (1968) (issue of fact); Tecon Corp. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 436 , 411 F.2d 1271 (1969) (issue of fact); Stock & Grove, Inc. v. … As this court stated in Broome Construction, Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 521 , 492 F.2d 829 (1974): In this the board was clearly correct.

Almours Secur., Inc. v. Commissioner

35 B.T.A. 61 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1936

United Business Corporation of America v. Commissioner, supra; United States v. Tway Coal Sales Co. (C. C. A., 6th Cir.), 15 Fed. (2d) 336; Irvington Investments Co., 32 B. T. A. 1165. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Hedgewick v. Akers

497 F.2d 905 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 13, 1974

Egnot v. Looker, 387 F.2d 680 , 55 CCPA 782 (1967); MacMillan v. … We believe the board should have decided whether Hedgewiek possessed the necessary conception with a view to avoiding the results of a piecemeal decision in event of reversal. See Wakefield v.

National Ass'n of Blue Shield Plans v. Standard Mattress Co.

478 F.2d 1253 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 14, 1973

The board found no documentation of the first item. … As an example, one of the cases is Sleepmaster Products Co. v. American Auto-Felt Co., 241 F.2d 738 , 44 CCPA 784 (1957) wherein the mark “HEALTHMASTER” was involved. Another ease, The Spring-Air Co. v.

Tomecek v. Stimpson

513 F.2d 614 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1975

See Paivinen v. Sands, 339 F.2d 217, 226-27 , 52 CCPA 906, 918 (1964). See also Knowles v. Tibbetts, 347 F.2d 591, 594 , 52 CCPA 1800, 1804 (1965); Voisinet v. Coglianese, 455 F.2d 1064, 1068 , 59 CCPA 958, 963 (1972). … We agree with the board that this activity did not negate Stimpson’s showing of a reduction to practice because it involved only a commercialization of the invention. See Koval v.

10-43 872

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

See Thun v. Peake, 22 Vet. … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995). Further, and according to Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed.

Bielec v. United States

456 F.2d 690 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

Harris v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 425 (1961). … See Ganse v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 183, 186 , 376 F. 2d 900 (1967); Price v. United States, 112 Ct. Cl. 198, 200 , 80 F. Supp. 542, 543 (1948); Coleman, v. United States, 100 Ct. Cl. 41 (1943); Dvorkin v.

M/V SIGNEBORG

9 I. & N. Dec. 6 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1960

National Surety yo., zo Auers v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 25 F. Supp. 458; Shultz v. Morgan, 42 P.. 254. ' 4 mitter v. Robertson, 266 U.S. 243. D United States v. J. H. … Construchan Co. v.

Vandegrift v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 198 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1912

As we stated in substance in United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 332 ; T. … It is claimed by the Government that from the date of the enactment of this law until the decision of the Supreme Court in Lawder v. Stone ( 187 U.

Adamson Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Peavey Electronics Corporation

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 1, 2023

to the Board as protected. … The Board may disregard the designation as ‘confidential’ for those matters which are improperly designated….”). … Person’s v. Christman, 9 USPQ2d 1477, 1480 (TTAB 1988). The Federal Circuit opinion affirmed the Board’s decision in Person’s, and cited Wallpaper Mfrs. v.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2017

Citing McCulloch v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … June 30, 2016) (reducing overall fee award by ten percent due to excessive and duplicative billing); Ericzon v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10-103V, 2016 WL 447770 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 15, 2016); Sexton v.

Miller v. Commissioner

28 B.T.A. 229 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1933

Flutmus v. City of Newport, 175 Ky. 817 ; 194 S.W. 1039 . This distinction is generally recognized. City of Winona v. Botzet, 169 Fed. 321 . … Byers, 35 Fed. (2d) 326; City of Winona v. Botzet, supra; Woodward v. Livermore Falls Water District, 116 Me. 86 ; 100 Atl. 317 . Cf. South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 , and Burnet v.

GOOLCHARAN

23 I. & N. Dec. 5 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2001

Golub, Assistant District Counsel Before: Board Panel: HEILMAN, FILPPU, and MOSCATO, Board Members. … V 1999) (stating that an order of deportation becomes final upon either a determination by the Board affirming the order below or the expiration of the time to appeal that order, whichever is earlier); Antiterrorism and Effective

Baker v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 315 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 27, 1992

Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991); see Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 16, 21 (1991); Parker v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 522, 526 (1991); Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1991); EF v. … See Fletcher v.

Pope v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 637 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1989

When substantial evidence supports a board’s action, and when that action is reasonable in light of all the evidence presented, the court will not disturb the result. Holman v. … When reasonable minds could reach differing conclusions in the same instance, the court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the military board. Maier v.

09-03 650

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 532, 538 (1993). … Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469-71 (1994). However, lay witnesses are not competent to provide a medical diagnosis. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007).

George v. United States

166 Ct. Cl. 527 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

Myers v. Bethlehem, Corporation, 303 U.S. 41 , 50-51 (1938); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 735-737 (1944); United States v. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234, 239-240 (1946). … United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926); Slavitt v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 606, 613 (1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 938 .

210109-129240

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 26, 2021

Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. As noted above, the AOJ found that the Veteran has been diagnosed with hypertension. The Board also notes that the Veteran is service connected for diabetes. … Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(b). Once VA undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a claim, the examination must be an adequate one. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.

190314-4046

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 26, 2019

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … O'Shay Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board S. Imam, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.